← Back to Patent Explorer
US3903194A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

HF Alkylation of isoparaffin with olefin heavier than ethylene with ethyl fluoride as reaction improver

Assignee: Phillips Petroleum Co
•
Filing: 1973-04-09
•
Granted: 1975-09-02
•
Expires: 1993-04-09
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Ethyl fluoride present in the system HF catalyst improves the reaction permitting advantageous alkylation of isoparaffin with olefin higher than ethylene. The ethyl fluoride is either generated in situ, as by introducing ethylene into the alkylation zone, or added as such at a convenient place, the improver or modifier being present in amounts, say, in the general range of from about 0.5 to about 30, preferably about 5 to about 30 percent weight based on the total HF catalyst containing the same; the ethyl fluoride will yield the same octane values at considerably lower than conventional isoparaffin to olefin ratios or at such conventional ratios will increase the octane number or value of the product. Yields of desirable alkylate are improved. Thus, at comparable ratios of reactants, the yield obtained of high octane alkylate, which has an octane considerably better than that obtained without the ethyl fluoride, e.g. an increase of about three numbers, Research clear, is increased, e.g. 98 percent as compared with about 80 percent, the ratio of reactants isobutane and propylene for the specific values here given having been 11.6:1 with the ethyl fluoride and 9.8:1 without this modifier. With same reactants at a ratio of 11.6:1, octane was substantially the same as with ethyl fluoride in the system catalyst, added thereto, as it was at 34:1 without ethyl fluoride, e.g. it was 93.4 RON clear with ethyl fluoride and 92.6 RON clear without ethyl fluoride. Moreover, with ethyl fluoride at the lower ratio the yield of motor alkylate was higher than with the much higher ratio, i.e. 98 percent at 11.6:1 with the ethyl fluoride and only 93.5 at 34:1 without ethyl fluoride. When ethyl fluoride is generated in the system, ethylene can be added as required to produce and to maintain the desired production of ethyl fluoride in the catalyst. Water is now maintained below about 3 weight percent of the catalyst phase, although higher amounts can be present. Similar results, yields and alkylate qualities are obtained with mixtures of iosparaffin, e.g. isobutane and/or isopentane with an olefin, e.g. propylene and/or butylenes, and/or amylenes.

Inventors

  • 👤 Jr Thomas Hutson
  • 👤 Cecil O Carter

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 20:49
CPC Classifications
C; C07; C07C; C07C2/00; C07C2/54; C07C2/56; C07C2/58; C07C2/62; C07C2527/00; C07C2527/06; C07C2527/08; C07C2527/12; C07C2527/1206; C07C2531/00; C07C2531/02

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim 70 words
THE PROCESS FOR THE ALKYLATION OF AT LEAST ONE ISOPARAFFIN SELECTED FROM ISOBUTANE AND ISOPENTANE AND MIXTURES THEREOF IN THE PRESENCE OF HF CATALYST, WITH AT LEAST ONE OLEFIN SELECTED FROM PROPYLENE AND BUTYLENE, EMPLOYING IN THE ALKYLATION REACTION SYSTEM ETHYL FLUORIDE AS AN ACTIVATOR FOR SAID HF CATALYST IN AN AMOUNT OF ABOUT 0.5 TO ABOUT 30 PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF THE TOTAL CATALYST WHICH INCLUDES SAID ETHYL FLUORIDE.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 70 words
THE PROCESS FOR THE ALKYLATION OF AT LEAST ONE ISOPARAFFIN SELECTED FROM ISOBUTANE AND ISOPENTANE AND MIXTURES THEREOF IN THE PRESENCE OF HF CATALYST, WITH AT LEAST ONE OLEFIN SELECTED FROM PROPYLENE AND BUTYLENE, EMPLOYING IN THE ALKYLATION REACTION SYSTEM ETHYL FLUORIDE AS AN ACTIVATOR FOR SAID HF CATALYST IN AN AMOUNT OF ABOUT 0.5 TO ABOUT 30 PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF THE TOTAL CATALYST WHICH INCLUDES SAID ETHYL FLUORIDE.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 17 words
A process according to claim 1 wherein the isoparaffin to olefin ratio is in the range 2:1-100:1.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 17 words
A process according to claim 1 wherein the isoparaffin to olefin ratio is in the range 10:1-15:1.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 24 words
A procesS according to claim 1 wherein the catalyst to hydrocarbon ratio is in the range of from 1/4:1 to about 20:1, by volume.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 25 words
A process according to claim 1 wherein the ethyl fluoride is introduced into said process with at least one of said isoparaffin or said olefin.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 18 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the olefin feed also contains up to about 30 weight percent ethylene.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 18 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the olefin feed also contains up to about 25 weight percent ethylene.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 18 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the olefin feed also contains up to about 15 weight percent ethylene.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 23 words
The process of claim 6 wherein water is present in an amount up to about 3 percent by weight of said total catalyst.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 27 words
The process of claim 9 wherein the ethyl fluoride is present in the range of from about 0.5 to about 10 weight percent of said total catalyst.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 23 words
The process of claim 7 wherein water is present in an amount up to about 3 percent by weight of said total catalyst.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 23 words
The process of claim 8 wherein water is present in an amount up to about 3 percent by weight of said total catalyst.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 27 words
The process of claim 11 wherein the ethyl fluoride is present in the range of from about 0.5 to about 10 weight percent of said total catalyst.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 27 words
The process of claim 12 wherein the ethyl fluoride is present in the range of from about 0.5 to about 15 weight percent of said total catalyst.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 44 words
The process of claim 10 wherein the isoparaffin to total olefin mole ratio is in the range of from about 2:1 to about 100: 1 and wherein the catalyst to hydrocarbon volume ratio is in the range of from about one-fourth to about 20:1.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 44 words
The process of claim 13 wherein the isoparaffin to total olefin mole ratio is in the range of from about 2:1 to about 100: 1 and wherein the catalyst to hydrocarbon volume ratio is in the range of from about one-fourth to about 20:1.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 44 words
The process of claim 14 wherein the isoparaffin to total olefin mole ratio is in the range of from about 2:1 to about 100: 1 and wherein the catalyst to hydrocarbon volume ratio is in the range of from about one-quarter to about 20:1.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3253054A Cited
US3751517A Cited
US3763265A Cited
US3767726A Cited
US3842140A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1978-09-01 1979-03-03 1979-09-02 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1982-09-01 1983-03-03 1983-09-02 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1986-09-01 1987-03-03 1987-09-02 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag