US4227806A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Methods for non-destructively determining parameters of an optical fiber preform
Assignee: AT&T Inc
•
Filing: 1978-10-16
•
Granted: 1980-10-14
•
Expires: 1998-10-16
Abstract
Abstract A narrow laser beam (16) scans a clad optical fiber preform (10) with a narrow, parallel scanning beam of coherent light and the deflection angle ( theta ) thereof measured as the beam exits the preform. The deflection angles ( theta ) of the scanning beam (16) are measured and compared to theoretical or empirically developed deflection angle scans of preforms having known parameters to determine the parameters of the preform. The deflection angle ( theta ) is plotted versus the incident beam position (d) and that plot is integrated to provide a curve (47) that is compared to theoretically developed plots having known parameters to determine parameters of the fiber preform such as refractive index gradient power, gamma , and the refractive index ratio, DELTA .
Inventors
- 👤 Laurence S. Watkins
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 17:00
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/17; G01N21/41; G01N21/412
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
111 words
A method of determining parameters of a cylindrical optical fiber preform having a core and a cladding, comprising the steps of: scanning at least a portion of the cylindrical surface of the preform with a narrow, parallel scanning beam of coherent light, the parallel scanning beam being located within a plane which is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the preform, said beam passing through and being refracted by said preform; detecting the angular deflections of the refracted scanning beam exiting the preform; and comparing the detected angular deflections of the scanning beam with angular deflections of beams passing through preforms having known parameters to determine the parameters of the preform.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
111 words
A method of determining parameters of a cylindrical optical fiber preform having a core and a cladding, comprising the steps of: scanning at least a portion of the cylindrical surface of the preform with a narrow, parallel scanning beam of coherent light, the parallel scanning beam being located within a plane which is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the preform, said beam passing through and being refracted by said preform; detecting the angular deflections of the refracted scanning beam exiting the preform; and comparing the detected angular deflections of the scanning beam with angular deflections of beams passing through preforms having known parameters to determine the parameters of the preform.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein: the detected angular deflections are compared with empirically developed detected angular deflections of the parallel scanning beam passing through preforms having known parameters.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein: the detected angular deflections are compared with theoretically determined angular deflections of the parallel scanning beam in preforms having known parameters.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
29 words
The method as set forth in claims 2 or 3 wherein: the parameters to be determined are the refractive index gradient power γ and the refractive index ratio Δ.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method as set forth in claim 1, characterized by: immersing the preform in oil prior to the scanning step.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
119 words
A method of determining the acceptability of the uniformity and homogeneity of deposited layers in a cylindrical optical fiber preform having a cladding about a graded index core, comprising the steps of: scanning at least a portion of the cylindrical surface of the preform with a narrow, parallel scanning beam of coherent light, the parallel scanning beam being located within a plane which is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the preform, said beam passing through and being refracted by said preform; detecting the angular deflection of the beam as the beam exits the preform; and comparing the detected angular deflections of the beam with angular deflections of the beam through preforms having acceptable ranges of uniformity and homogeneity.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
119 words
A method of determining the acceptability of the uniformity and homogeneity of deposited layers in a cylindrical optical fiber preform having a cladding about a graded index core, comprising the steps of: scanning at least a portion of the cylindrical surface of the preform with a narrow, parallel scanning beam of coherent light, the parallel scanning beam being located within a plane which is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the preform, said beam passing through and being refracted by said preform; detecting the angular deflection of the beam as the beam exits the preform; and comparing the detected angular deflections of the beam with angular deflections of the beam through preforms having acceptable ranges of uniformity and homogeneity.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method as set forth in claim 6, characterized by: immersing the preform in oil prior to the scanning step.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
157 words
A method of non-destructively determining the refractive index gradient power, γ, in a cylindrical optical fiber preform having a cladding about a graded index core, comprising the steps of: (1) scanning at least a portion of the surface of the preform with a narrow, parallel scanning beam of coherent light, the parallel scanning beam being located within a plane which is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the preform, said beam passing through and being refracted by said preform; (2) detecting the angular deflection of the light beam as the beam exits the preform; (3) plotting a curve of the detected deflection angle versus the position of the scanning light beam; (4) integrating the curve of the detected deflected angle; (5) fitting a polynomial curve to the integrated deflection angle curve; and (6) determining the refractive index gradient power, γ, by comparing the coefficients of the polynomial to theoretically developed curves of the polynomial coefficients versus γ.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
157 words
A method of non-destructively determining the refractive index gradient power, γ, in a cylindrical optical fiber preform having a cladding about a graded index core, comprising the steps of: (1) scanning at least a portion of the surface of the preform with a narrow, parallel scanning beam of coherent light, the parallel scanning beam being located within a plane which is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the preform, said beam passing through and being refracted by said preform; (2) detecting the angular deflection of the light beam as the beam exits the preform; (3) plotting a curve of the detected deflection angle versus the position of the scanning light beam; (4) integrating the curve of the detected deflected angle; (5) fitting a polynomial curve to the integrated deflection angle curve; and (6) determining the refractive index gradient power, γ, by comparing the coefficients of the polynomial to theoretically developed curves of the polynomial coefficients versus γ.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method as set forth in claim 8, wherein the refractive index ratio, Δ, is determined in accordance with the following equation: Δ=T.sub.p /Kγ.sup.0.41 T p is the peak value of the integrated deflection angle curve, K is a calibration constant, γ is the refractive index gradient power.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
111 words
Apparatus for determining parameters of a cylindrical optical fiber preform having a core and a cladding, comprising: means for scanning at least a portion of the cylindrical surface of the preform with a narrow, parallel scanning beam of coherent light, the parallel scanning beam being located within a plane which is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the preform, said beam passing through and being refracted by said preform; means for detecting the angular deflection of the beam as the beam exits the preform; and means for comparing the detected angular deflections of the beam with angular deflections passing through preforms having known parameters to determine the parameters of the preform.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
111 words
Apparatus for determining parameters of a cylindrical optical fiber preform having a core and a cladding, comprising: means for scanning at least a portion of the cylindrical surface of the preform with a narrow, parallel scanning beam of coherent light, the parallel scanning beam being located within a plane which is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the preform, said beam passing through and being refracted by said preform; means for detecting the angular deflection of the beam as the beam exits the preform; and means for comparing the detected angular deflections of the beam with angular deflections passing through preforms having known parameters to determine the parameters of the preform.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
17 words
The apparatus as set forth in claim 10, wherein: the optical fiber preform is immersed in oil.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
27 words
The apparatus as set forth in claim 10, wherein: the parameters to be determined are the refractive index gradient power γ and the refractive index ratio Δ.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3636360A
Cited
US3765774A
Cited
US3873208A
Cited
US3879128A
Cited
US4021217A
Cited
US4027977A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1983-10-14 | 1984-04-14 | 1984-10-14 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1987-10-14 | 1988-04-14 | 1988-10-14 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1991-10-14 | 1992-04-14 | 1992-10-14 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |