US4282748A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Mechanical moment sensitivity compensation in shear beam transducers
Assignee: Hottinger Baldwin Measurements Inc
•
Filing: 1979-06-27
•
Granted: 1981-08-11
•
Expires: 1999-06-27
Abstract
Abstract The moment sensitivity of shear beam transducers is mechanically compensated to make such transducers relatively insensitive to load applications which are off-center relative to an optimal point of load application. Such shear beam transducers have a free end forming a load application section, a mounting section, and a fillet located substantially where the sections merge. The compensation is made by providing the fillet initially with a larger radius than the final compensating radius. The compensation is made by gradually changing the fillet radius until the transducer output shows substantially no difference between the measurement resulting from applying a defined load in the optimal loading point and the measurement resulting from applying the same load off-center the optimal loading point whereby the transducer becomes substantially insensitive to such off-center load applications.
Inventors
- 👤 Harry E. Lockery
- 👤 Eric Laimins
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 15:34
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01L; G01L1/00; G01L1/26; G01L1/20; G01L1/22; G01L1/2206; G01L1/2218; G01L1/2225
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
228 words
A method for mechanically compensating the moment sensitivity of a shear beam transducer having a free end load application section, a mounting section and fillet means located substantially where said sections merge, comprising the following steps: providing said fillet means with an initial fillet radius which differs from a final compensating radius, establishing a load application axis extending through an optimal loading point in said load application section of said shear beam transducer, applying a defined load to the shear beam transducer in said optimal loading point, measuring the respective transducer output, applying said defined load off-center relative to said optimal loading point and again measuring the respective transducer output, comparing the two transducer outputs with each other to ascertain any difference between the two measurements, mechanically changing said initial fillet radius, applying said defined load again off-center and measuring the resulting output, comparing the outputs again to see whether the respective difference has been reduced relative to said first mentioned difference, and continuing the foregoing steps including the mechanical changing of the fillet radius until said difference is substantially zero, whereby the shear beam transducer is made substantially insensitive to off-center load applications, and whereby all shear beam transducers of the same type may be provided with the same compensating fillet radius once the foregoing steps have been performed for one shear beam transducer of that type.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
228 words
A method for mechanically compensating the moment sensitivity of a shear beam transducer having a free end load application section, a mounting section and fillet means located substantially where said sections merge, comprising the following steps: providing said fillet means with an initial fillet radius which differs from a final compensating radius, establishing a load application axis extending through an optimal loading point in said load application section of said shear beam transducer, applying a defined load to the shear beam transducer in said optimal loading point, measuring the respective transducer output, applying said defined load off-center relative to said optimal loading point and again measuring the respective transducer output, comparing the two transducer outputs with each other to ascertain any difference between the two measurements, mechanically changing said initial fillet radius, applying said defined load again off-center and measuring the resulting output, comparing the outputs again to see whether the respective difference has been reduced relative to said first mentioned difference, and continuing the foregoing steps including the mechanical changing of the fillet radius until said difference is substantially zero, whereby the shear beam transducer is made substantially insensitive to off-center load applications, and whereby all shear beam transducers of the same type may be provided with the same compensating fillet radius once the foregoing steps have been performed for one shear beam transducer of that type.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising ascertaining the optimal fillet radius for a given shear beam transducer type by employing the foregoing steps, and then machining the fillet radius of all transducers of the same type to said optimal fillet radius.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
48 words
A shear beam transducer, comprising a free end load application section, a mounting section and fillet means located in a zone substantially where said sections merge, said fillet means comprising a radius adjusted to an optimum value such that the transducer is substantially insensitive to off-center load applications.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
48 words
A shear beam transducer, comprising a free end load application section, a mounting section and fillet means located in a zone substantially where said sections merge, said fillet means comprising a radius adjusted to an optimum value such that the transducer is substantially insensitive to off-center load applications.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
23 words
The shear beam transducer of claim 3, wherein said fillet radius has a length within the range of 6 mm to 75 mm.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
29 words
The shear beam transducer of claim 3, wherein said fillet means comprise the shape substantially of a semi-circle the radius of which has been adjusted to said optimum value.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
22 words
The shear beam transducer of claim 5, wherein said semi-circle is located substantially in said mounting section adjacent to said merging zone.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
22 words
The shear beam transducer of claim 5, wherein said semi-circle is located substantially in said load application section adjacent said merging zone.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
29 words
The shear beam transducer of claim 3, wherein said fillet means comprise the shape substantially of a circle the radius of which has been adjusted to said optimum value.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
37 words
The shear beam transducer of claim 3, wherein said fillet radius extends along a line which includes an angle with the adjacent wall of said mounting section, said angle being within the range of 30° to 45°.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
57 words
The shear beam transducer of claim 3, wherein said fillet means comprise the shape substantially of a circle, said circle being located to provide a spacing between a point on the circumference of said circle and a point where walls of said transducer sections intersect, said spacing being within the range of 0 mm and 50 mm.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
44 words
The shear beam transducer of claim 3, wherein said load application section has a substantially square cross-section, and wherein said fillet means has the shape of a portion of a cylinder surface with a radius in the range of 6 mm to 75 mm.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3960228A
Cited
US3949603A
Cited
US4009608A
Cited
US3994161A
Cited
US4020686A
Cited
US4128001A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1984-08-10 | 1985-02-09 | 1985-08-11 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1988-08-10 | 1989-02-09 | 1989-08-11 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1992-08-10 | 1993-02-09 | 1993-08-11 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |