US4344709A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus for photogoniometric analysis of surfaces
Assignee: Akzo Nobel Paints LLC
•
Filing: 1980-05-08
•
Granted: 1982-08-17
•
Expires: 2000-05-08
Abstract
Abstract A method and apparatus for photogoniometric analysis of surfaces is disclosed. A photogoniometric instrument includes a light source (12) for providing a collimated beam of light illuminating a test surface (18). A light detector (20) is mounted for rotation about the point of intersection of the illuminating beam on the test surface. A motor (44) drives the detector through a range of reflectance angles, and a microcomputer (52) digitizes the detector output periodically, storing the digitized data words in its memory (68). These stored words define a photogoniometric curve (FIG. 2A) including a specular portion (FIG. 2D) and a nonspecular, or diffuse, portion (FIG. 2C). A host computer (62) receives the photogoniometric data from the microcomputer, deconvolutes the data into spectral and diffuse portions, and analyzes the two portions separately from one another. To accomplish this deconvolution, the host computer subtracts from the photogoniometric data the actual reflectance characteristic of a standard surface whose characteristic lacks the specular peak. This diffuse standard reflectance characteristic is stored in the host computer memory in the form of a mathematical equation which has been curve fitted to the actual reflectance characteristics of the diffused standard.
Inventors
- 👤 Theodore Provder
- 👤 Richard M. Holsworth
- 👤 Mark E. Koehler
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 03:26
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/17; G01N21/47; G01N21/4738
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
106 words
A method of analyzing the specular reflectance characteristics of a test surface comprising the steps of: illuminating said test surface with a collimated beam of light incident on said surface at a known angle, measuring the reflectance characteristics of said test surface by measuring the intensity of light reflected from said surface at plural selected angles of reflectance, providing a mathematical equation relating reflectance intensity to reflectance angle for a standard surface whose reflectance characteristic substantially lacks a spectral peak, and analyzing the difference between the reflectance characteristics of said test surface and said mathematical equation, said difference representing the spectral reflectance characteristic of said surface.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
106 words
A method of analyzing the specular reflectance characteristics of a test surface comprising the steps of: illuminating said test surface with a collimated beam of light incident on said surface at a known angle, measuring the reflectance characteristics of said test surface by measuring the intensity of light reflected from said surface at plural selected angles of reflectance, providing a mathematical equation relating reflectance intensity to reflectance angle for a standard surface whose reflectance characteristic substantially lacks a spectral peak, and analyzing the difference between the reflectance characteristics of said test surface and said mathematical equation, said difference representing the spectral reflectance characteristic of said surface.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
76 words
A method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said analyzing step comprises the steps of scaling said mathematical equation so that said scaled equation defines a charcteristic which substantially corresponds to the non-spectral portion of the reflectance characteristic of said test surface, subtracting said scaled equation from said reflectance characteristic of said test surface to provide a characteristic essentially representing only the spectral reflectance characteristic of said test surface, and analyzing said spectral reflectance characteristic.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
56 words
A method as set forth in claim 2, wherein said step of scaling comprises the step of scaling the mathematical equation for said standard surface such that the scaled equation evaluated at a substantially zero reflectance angle is substantially the same as the measured reflectance intensity of said test surface at said substantially zero reflectance angle.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
71 words
A method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said step of providing said mathematical equation comprises the step of providing a mathematical equation of the form I=K[Cos θ+f(θ)] where I is reflectance intensity, θ is reflectance angle, K is a proportionality factor, and f(θ) is a function selection to match the difference between the actual reflectance characteristic of said standard surface and the theoretical characteristic of a perfect diffuse reflector.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
67 words
A method as set forth in claim 4, wherein f(θ) varies with the angle at which light was incident on said standard surface when said reflectance characteristic thereof was derived, and wherein said providing step further comprises the step of providing the f(θ) associated with the incident angle corresponding to the angle at which light was incident on said test surface when said measuring step was performed.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
94 words
A method as set forth in claim 5, wherein said step of providing the f(θ) associated with the incident angle corresponding to the angle at which light was incident on said test surface comprises the steps of providing a general mathematical function f(θ) of the form A+Bθ+Cθ 2 , where A, B, and C are coefficients whose values vary with said incident angle, and providing specific values for the coefficients A, B, and C in accordance with the angle at which light was incident on said test surface when said measuring step was performed.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
87 words
A method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said step of providing a mathematical equation comprises the steps of illuminating said standard surface with a collimated beam of light incident on said surface at a known angle, measuring the reflectance characteristics of said standard surface by measuring the intensity of light reflected from said surface at plural selected angles of reflectance, matching a mathematical equation to said reflectance characteristic, and providing said mathematical equation as an indication of the actual reflectance characteristics of said standard surface.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
51 words
A method as set forth in claim 7, wherein said step of matching a mathematical equation comprises the step of selecting values for coefficients A, B, and C such that the function I=K[Cos θ+A+Bθ+Cθ 2 ] closely matches said reflectance ch,aracteristic, where I is reflectance intensity and θ is reflectance angle.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said standard surface comprises substantially TiO 2 .
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1985-08-16 | 1986-02-15 | 1986-08-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1989-08-16 | 1990-02-15 | 1990-08-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1993-08-16 | 1994-02-15 | 1994-08-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |