← Back to Patent Explorer
US4467342A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Multi-chip imager

Assignee: RCA Licensing Corp
•
Filing: 1982-07-15
•
Granted: 1984-08-21
•
Expires: 2002-07-15
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Thinned, contiguous imager chips, are arranged end-to-end, and accurately positioned relative to one another, that is, are positioned so that the proper spacing period between adjacent imager pixel detectors is maintained, by using a lap joint between contiguous chips. The use of a lap joint rather than a butt joint permits operation without any significant phase difference occurring and without any pixel detector gap occurring at the lap joint seam. Further, such a lap joint permits proper operation to be obtained even with relatively coarse chip-edge tolerances.

Inventors

  • 👤 John R. Tower

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-25 13:36
CPC Classifications
H; H10; H10F; H10F39/00; H10F39/10; H10F39/12; H10F39/15; H10F39/157; H10W; H10W90/00

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 9
Claim 1
Independent Claim 250 words
In a solid-state radiant energy imager adapted to be illuminated by means of imaging optics with an image, said imager being comprised of at least two contiguous juxtaposed solid-state imager chips in which each of said two chips includes at least one corresponding line of periodically spaced pixel detectors, the respective spacing periods of said pixel detectors of said corresponding lines of said two chips being substantially the same as one another; the improvement: wherein an end portion of one of said two chips overlaps an end portion of the other of said two chips and said two chips are joined together by a lap joint in which the extent of overlap of said two chips is arranged such that the spacing distance, between a pixel detector situated within said end portion of said one of said two chips and a pixel detector situated within said end portion of said other of said two chips, is substantially equal to that of said respective spacing periods of said corresponding lines of said two chips, so that no pixel detector gap occurs at lap joint seam, and wherein each of said two chips is sufficiently thinned so that radiant energy illuminating said lap joint can pass through said chips and reach all pixel detectors within said overlapped end portions of said chips with insignificant attenuation, and so that the respective depth positions of the pixel detectors of said two overlapped chips are both within the depth of focus of said imaging optics.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 250 words
In a solid-state radiant energy imager adapted to be illuminated by means of imaging optics with an image, said imager being comprised of at least two contiguous juxtaposed solid-state imager chips in which each of said two chips includes at least one corresponding line of periodically spaced pixel detectors, the respective spacing periods of said pixel detectors of said corresponding lines of said two chips being substantially the same as one another; the improvement: wherein an end portion of one of said two chips overlaps an end portion of the other of said two chips and said two chips are joined together by a lap joint in which the extent of overlap of said two chips is arranged such that the spacing distance, between a pixel detector situated within said end portion of said one of said two chips and a pixel detector situated within said end portion of said other of said two chips, is substantially equal to that of said respective spacing periods of said corresponding lines of said two chips, so that no pixel detector gap occurs at lap joint seam, and wherein each of said two chips is sufficiently thinned so that radiant energy illuminating said lap joint can pass through said chips and reach all pixel detectors within said overlapped end portions of said chips with insignificant attenuation, and so that the respective depth positions of the pixel detectors of said two overlapped chips are both within the depth of focus of said imaging optics.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 84 words
The imager defined in claim 1, wherein said imager comprises at least three contiguous juxtaposed thinned imager chips in which a first of said three chips includes first and second end portions, and wherein one end portion of said first chip overlaps one end portion of a second of said three chips to form a first lap joint and the other end portion of said first chip overlaps one end portion of a third of said three chips to form a second lap joint.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 42 words
The imager defined in claim 2, wherein the arrangement of the overlapping relationship forming said first lap joint and the arrangement of the overlapping relationship forming said second lap joint are such as to form said three chips into a shingle pattern.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 42 words
The imager defined in claim 2, wherein the arrangement of the overlapping relationship forming said first lap joint and the arrangement of the overlapping relationship forming said second lap joint are such as to form said three chips into a step pattern.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 17 words
The imager defined in claim 1, wherein said period is in the range of 10-30 μm micrometers.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 22 words
The imager defined in claim 5, wherein the thickness of each of said thinned chips is in the range of 10-15 micrometers.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 60 words
The imager defined in claim 6, wherein said period is substantially 25 micrometers, wherein the thickness of each of said thinned chips is substantially 15 micrometers, and wherein the distance in the thickness direction between the respective positions of pixel detectors of a first of said two chips and of a second of said two chips is substantially 16 micrometers.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 16 words
The imager defined in claim 1, wherein said imager chips of said imager are silicon chips.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3939555A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1987-08-21 1988-02-20 1988-08-21 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1991-08-21 1992-02-20 1992-08-21 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1995-08-21 1996-02-20 1996-08-21 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag