US4665496A — Process and apparatus for the evaluation of the p…

Claim 1

Independent Claim 212 words

A process for evaluating the printing quality of a printed product produced on an offset printing machine having a printing plate prepared from a photographic master, in which the printed product and a reference are each divided into image elements and photoelectrically measured, in which for each image element, a respective reference reflectance value and an actual reflectance value are determined and the respective reference and actual reflectance values of corresponding image elements compared with each other, and in which a quality measure Q is determined from said comparisons, comprising the steps of: determining, for each printing ink color, the reference reflectance value R s and the actual reflectance value R i and comparing them; assigning to each image element at least one of the following associated factors: a perception weighting factor H e which forms a measure of the perception of color deviations, and a full tone weighting factor G e which forms a measure of the effect of full tone density on the reflectance as a function of surface coverage; and weighting the differences between the reference reflectance values R s and the corresponding actual reflectance values R i with said at least one of the associated perception weight factor H e and full tone weight factor G e .

Claim 2

Dependent Claim 212 words

A process for evaluating the printing quality of a printed product produced on an offset printing machine having a printing plate prepared from a photographic master, in which the printed product and a reference are each divided into image elements and photoelectrically measured, in which for each image element, a respective reference reflectance value and an actual reflectance value are determined and the respective reference and actual reflectance values of corresponding image elements compared with each other, and in which a quality measure Q is determined from said comparisons, comprising the steps of: determining, for each printing ink color, the reference reflectance value R s and the actual reflectance value R i and comparing them; assigning to each image element at least one of the following associated factors: a perception weighting factor H e which forms a measure of the perception of color deviations, and a full tone weighting factor G e which forms a measure of the effect of full tone density on the reflectance as a function of surface coverage; and weighting the differences between the reference reflectance values R s and the corresponding actual reflectance values R i with said at least one of the associated perception weight factor H e and full tone weight factor G e .

Claim 3

Dependent Claim 102 words

A process according to claim 1, wherein: at least one of the references of the printing plate and the photographic master used in its preparation are utilized as a reference for the respective ink color; and further comprising the steps of determining the surface coverage for each image element of said reference; and calculating the reference reflectance value R s for each image element E and each printing ink from the surface coverage of the image element involved, taking into consideration at least one of the parameters of the printing process including the printing characteristic and effect of the full tone density.

Claim 4

Dependent Claim 50 words

A process according to claim 2, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements of the reference is effected with a higher resolution than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values R i for the respective image elements of the printed product.

Claim 5

Dependent Claim 33 words

A process according to claim 3, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is performed by measuring reflectance by integrating over the surface area of the image elements.

Claim 6

Dependent Claim 49 words

A process according to claim 4, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is effected with a resolution ten times greater than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values R i for the respective image elements of the printed products.

Claim 7

Dependent Claim 23 words

A process according to claim 5, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements ranges from 25 to 400 mm 2 .

Claim 8

Dependent Claim 21 words

A process according to claim 6, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements is approximately 1 cm 2 .

Claim 9

Dependent Claim 27 words

A process according to claim 7, further comprising the step of dividing the image elements into subelements ranging from 0.25 to 25 mm 2 in surface area.

Claim 10

Dependent Claim 20 words

A process according to claim 8, wherein the image elements are divided into subelements of approximately 1 mm 2 .

Claim 11

Dependent Claim 60 words

A process according to claim 8, further comprising the step of: determining a subreference reflectance value RS s for each subelement of an image element, taking into consideration important parameters of the printing process; and wherein the respective reference reflectance values R s of the image elements are determined from all of the respective subreference reflectance values RS s .

Claim 12

Dependent Claim 24 words

A process according to claim 10, wherein the reference reflectance value R s is calculated by averaging the subreference reflectance values RS s .

Claim 13

Dependent Claim 85 words

A process according to claim 11, further comprising the steps of: assigning to each subelement at least one of the following factors: a sub-full tone weighting factor GS e and a sub-perception weighting factor HS e ; and calculating at least one of the following factors: a full-tone weighting factor G e and a perception weighting factor H e , respectively, said calculations being performed by taking respective averages of the assigned sub-full tone weighting factors GS e and sub-perception weighting factors HS e .

Claim 14

Dependent Claim 114 words

A process according to claim 12, wherein each of a plurality of printing zones is defined as a plurality of image elements, and further comprising the steps of: for each printing ink, determining a zone error value Δ z from differences Δ e between the actual reflectance values R i and the reference reflectance values R s of the image elements belonging to a common printing zone by integrating the differences Δ e , weighted with at least one of the full tone weighting factor G e and the perception weighting factor H e , over the common print zone; and determining the quality measure Q from the zone error values Δ z .

Claim 15

Dependent Claim 19 words

A process according to claim 1, wherein the reference further include a printed product previously determined to be satisfactory.

Claim 16

Dependent Claim 45 words

A process according to claim 14, wherein, for each printing ink the reference reflectance values R s and at least one of the corresponding full tone and perception weighting factors G e and H e of the image elements are determined from the same reference.

Claim 17

Dependent Claim 54 words

A process according to claim 14, wherein the reference reflectance values R s are determined on the basis of a printed product found to be satisfactory, and at least one of the full tone and perception weighting factors G e and H e are determined from the printing plates corresponding to respective photographic masters.

Claim 18

Dependent Claim 36 words

A process according to claim 14, wherein the step of determining the reflectance values R i from the printed products is performed by measuring the printed products densitometrically in front of and behind each printing mechanism.

Claim 19

Dependent Claim 55 words

A process according to claim 1, wherein the step of determining the reference reflectance value R s comprises determining surface coverage for the image elements of the reference with a higher resolution than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values R i for the respective image elements of the printed product.

Claim 20

Dependent Claim 33 words

A process according to claim 18, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is performed by measuring reflectance by integrating over the surface area of the image elements.

Claim 21

Dependent Claim 49 words

A process according to claim 19, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is effected with a resolution ten times greater than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values R i for the respective image elements of the printed products.

Claim 22

Dependent Claim 23 words

A process according to claim 20, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements ranges from 25 to 400 mm 2 .

Claim 23

Dependent Claim 21 words

A process according to claim 21, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements is approximately 1 cm 2 .

Claim 24

Dependent Claim 29 words

A process according to claim 18, further comprising the step of dividing the image elements into subelements having a surface area ranging from 0.25 to 25 mm 2 .

Claim 25

Dependent Claim 24 words

A process according to claim 23, wherein the image elements are divided into subelements having a surface area of approximately 1 mm 2 .

Claim 26

Dependent Claim 60 words

A process according to claim 23, further comprising the step of: determining a subreference reflectance value RS s for each subelement of an image element, taking into consideration important parameters of the printing process; and wherein the respective reference reflectance values R s of the image elements are determined from all of the respective subreference reflectance values RS s .

Claim 27

Dependent Claim 24 words

A process according to claim 25, wherein the reference reflectance value R s is calculated by averaging the subreference reflectance values RS s .

Claim 28

Dependent Claim 85 words

A process according to claim 25, further comprising the steps of: assigning to each subelement at least one of the following factors: a sub-full tone weighting factor GS e and a sub-perception weighting factor HS e ; and calculating at least one of the following factors: a full-tone weighting factor G e and a perception weighting factor H e , respectively, said calculation being performed by taking respective averages of the assigned sub-full tone weighting factors GS e and sub-perception weighting factors HS e .

Claim 29

Dependent Claim 113 words

A process according to claim 27, wherein each of a plurality of printing zones is defined by a plurality of image elements, and further comprising the steps of: for each printing ink, determining a zone error value Δ z from differences Δ e between actual reflectance values R i and the reference reflectance values R s of the image elements belonging to a common printing zone, by integrating the differences Δ e , weighted with at least one of the full tone weighting factor G e and the perception weighting factor H e , over the common print zone; and determining the quality measure Q from the zone error values Δ z .

Claim 30

Independent Claim 152 words

An apparatus for evaluating the printing quality of a printed product made on an offset printing machine having means for photoelectrically scanning printed products and a reference, by image elements, and having computing means, connected to said scanning means, for comparing the differences between printed products and the reference, by image elements, and for forming a quality measure from the results of the comparison, wherein the computing means assigns to each image element at least one of the following factors: a perception weighting factor H e , forming a measure of color deviations and a full tone weighting factor G e , describing the effect of full tone density on reflectance as a function of its surface coverage and color, and wherein the computing means further weights the differences between the printed product and the reference with at least one of the associated perception weight factor and full tone weight factor, respectively.

Claim 31

Independent Claim 152 words

An apparatus for evaluating the printing quality of a printed product made on an offset printing machine having means for photoelectrically scanning printed products and a reference, by image elements, and having computing means, connected to said scanning means, for comparing the differences between printed products and the reference, by image elements, and for forming a quality measure from the results of the comparison, wherein the computing means assigns to each image element at least one of the following factors: a perception weighting factor H e , forming a measure of color deviations and a full tone weighting factor G e , describing the effect of full tone density on reflectance as a function of its surface coverage and color, and wherein the computing means further weights the differences between the printed product and the reference with at least one of the associated perception weight factor and full tone weight factor, respectively.

Claim 32

Dependent Claim 54 words

A apparatus according to claim 29, further comprising: display means for graphically displaying at least one of the following: the measured reflectances of the reference, the reference reflectance values calculated therefrom, the actual reflectance values of the printed products, and the respective differences between the reference and actual reflectance values, and another quality measure.

Claim 33

Dependent Claim 28 words

An apparatus according to claim 29, wherein the scanning means is operable to scan the reference with a higher resolution than that obtained when scanning the printed products.

Claim 34

Dependent Claim 27 words

An apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the scanning means is operable to scan a reference in the form of a printing plate photoelectrically, by image elements.

Claim 35

Dependent Claim 54 words

An apparatus according to claim 31, further comprising: display means for graphically displaying at least one of the following: the measured reflectances of the reference, the reference reflectance values calculated therefrom, the actual reflectance values of the printed products, and the respective differences between the reference and actual reflectance values, and another quality measure.

Claim 36

Dependent Claim 157 words

An offset printing machine, comprising: an apparatus for evaluating the printing quality of a printed product made on said offset printing machine, said apparatus having means for photoelectrically scanning printed products and a reference, by image elements, and having computing means, connected to said scanning means, for comparing the differences between printed products and the reference, by image elements, and for forming a quality measure from the results of the comparison, wherein the computing means assigns to each image element at least one of the following factors: a perception weighting factor H e forming a measure of color deviations, and a full tone weighting factor G e describing the effect of full tone density on reflectance as a function of its surface coverage and color, and wherein the computing means further weights the differences between the printed product and the reference with at least one of the associated perception weight factor and full tone weight factor, respectively.

Claim 37

Dependent Claim 157 words

An offset printing machine, comprising: an apparatus for evaluating the printing quality of a printed product made on said offset printing machine, said apparatus having means for photoelectrically scanning printed products and a reference, by image elements, and having computing means, connected to said scanning means, for comparing the differences between printed products and the reference, by image elements, and for forming a quality measure from the results of the comparison, wherein the computing means assigns to each image element at least one of the following factors: a perception weighting factor H e forming a measure of color deviations, and a full tone weighting factor G e describing the effect of full tone density on reflectance as a function of its surface coverage and color, and wherein the computing means further weights the differences between the printed product and the reference with at least one of the associated perception weight factor and full tone weight factor, respectively.

Annuity Stage	Window Opens	Payment Deadline	Surcharge Period Until	Estimated Fee	Status
3.5 Years (Year 4)	1990-05-11	1990-11-10	1991-05-12	$2000.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8)	1994-05-11	1994-11-10	1995-05-12	$3760.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12)	1998-05-11	1998-11-10	1999-05-12	$7700.00	Window Closed / Lapsed

Process and apparatus for the evaluation of the printing quality of a printed product by an offset printing machine

Abstract

Inventors

Bibliographic Details

Claims Analysis

References Cited (Backward Citations)

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Assigned Categories & Tags

Assign Category Tag