Method for determining the effective water saturation in a low-resistivity hydrocarbon-bearing rock formation based upon rock matrix conductance

Claim 1

A method for determining the effective water saturation of a low-resistivity, hydrocarbon-bearing subsurface rock formation, comprising the steps of: (a) determining the free-fluid pore network conductance of said low-resistivity rock formation, (b) determining the rock matrix conductance of said low-resistivity rock formation, and (c) determining the effective water saturation of said low-resistivity rock formation from a taking of the reciprocal of the sum of said free-fluid pore network conductance and said rock matrix conductance.

Claim 2

A method for determining the effective water saturation of a low-resistivity, hydrocarbon-bearing subsurface rock formation, comprising the steps of: (a) determining the free-fluid pore network conductance of said low-resistivity rock formation, (b) determining the rock matrix conductance of said low-resistivity rock formation, and (c) determining the effective water saturation of said low-resistivity rock formation from a taking of the reciprocal of the sum of said free-fluid pore network conductance and said rock matrix conductance.

Claim 4

A method for determining the effective water saturation in a low-resistivity, hydrocarbon-bearing subsurface rock formation, comprising the steps of: (a) measuring the electrical resistivity, ρ tm , of the formation rock having matrix conductance with an electric log, (b) measuring the electrical resistivity, ρ w , of the formation pore water with an electric log or from formation water samples, (c) measuring formation porosity (φ) with one or more types of porosity logs, e.g., density, neutron or sonic logs, (d) measuring resistivity index (I) vs. water saturation (S w ) data from core samples for a plurality of decreasing saturation points, (e) determining a parameter (a) and a saturation exponent (n) which relate the identified resistivity index (I) and effective water saturation (S w ) by a least squares method of fitting the following relationship to said core resistivity index and water saturation: ##EQU3## (f) determining a porosity exponent (m) from the formation factor (F) and formation porosity (φ) as follows: m=-(log(F/a)/log(φ), and (g) determining the effective formation water saturation as follows: ##EQU4##

Claim 5

A method for determining the effective water saturation in a low-resistivity, hydrocarbon-bearing subsurface rock formation, comprising the steps of: (a) measuring the electrical resistivity, ρ tm , of the formation rock having matrix conductance with an electric log, (b) measuring the electrical resistivity, ρ w , of the formation pore water with an electric log or from formation water samples, (c) measuring formation porosity (φ) with one or more types of porosity logs, e.g., density, neutron or sonic logs, (d) measuring resistivity index (I) vs. water saturation (S w ) data from core samples for a plurality of decreasing saturation points, (e) determining a parameter (a) and a saturation exponent (n) which relate the identified resistivity index (I) and effective water saturation (S w ) by a least squares method of fitting the following relationship to said core resistivity index and water saturation: ##EQU3## (f) determining a porosity exponent (m) from the formation factor (F) and formation porosity (φ) as follows: m=-(log(F/a)/log(φ), and (g) determining the effective formation water saturation as follows: ##EQU4##

Claim 6

A method as in any one of claims 1, 2 or 3 further comprising the step of determining the producible hydrocarbon potential of said low resistivity, subsurface rock formation as follows: S.sub.o =1-S.sub.w, where S w =effective water saturation, and S o =oil saturation, which is representative of said producible hydrocarbon potential.