US4805114A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Economical dispatching arrangement for a boiler system having a cogenerative capability
Assignee: Emerson Process Management Power and Water Solutions Inc
•
Filing: 1987-04-20
•
Granted: 1989-02-14
•
Expires: 2007-04-20
Abstract
Abstract An economical despatching arrangement for despatching load and fuel assignments on a multi-boiler cogenerative type steam generating plant includes a logic arrangement of determining a present value of flow of each fuel to each boiler, a logic arrangement of determining a present value of the share of the steam load carried by each of the boilers, a logic arrangement for calculating an optimal next value for each of the load and fuel assignments, a logic arrangement for estimating a proportionate share value for one of the boilers and the fuel flow values for one of the fuels and a logic arrangement for implementing the optimal next values as a function of whether a manual or automatic mode of operation has been selected for the particular parameter.
Inventors
- 👤 Richard E. Putman
- 👤 Thomas Allen
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 15:32
CPC Classifications
F; F22; F22B; F22B35/00; F22B35/008; G; G06; G06Q; G06Q50/00; G06Q50/06
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
225 words
An arrangement for economically despatching fuel and load assignments on a multi-boiler cogenerative type steam generating plant, said economical despatching arrangement capable of firing each boiler with at least two fuels and of allocating shares of a total steam load among the boilers, said economical despatching arrangement comprising: means for determining a present value of the flow of each fuel to each of said boilers and storing each determined value; of means for determining present values of said shares said total steam load allocated among said boilers which store a respective said determined share associated therewith; for each means for calculating an optimal next value of said fuel and load assignments as a function of said present fuel flow values and present share values; said calculating means including a means for estimating a proportionate share value on one of said boilers and a fuel flow value for one of said at least two fuels, said calculating means, by use of said estimating means, calculates said optimal next values for each of said fuel and load assignments using a quantity of variables reduced in number relative to the quantity of said fuel and load assignments; and, means for implementing at least one of said optimal next values into said multi-boiler cogenerative type steam generating plant in one of an automatic and a manual mode of operation.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
225 words
An arrangement for economically despatching fuel and load assignments on a multi-boiler cogenerative type steam generating plant, said economical despatching arrangement capable of firing each boiler with at least two fuels and of allocating shares of a total steam load among the boilers, said economical despatching arrangement comprising: means for determining a present value of the flow of each fuel to each of said boilers and storing each determined value; of means for determining present values of said shares said total steam load allocated among said boilers which store a respective said determined share associated therewith; for each means for calculating an optimal next value of said fuel and load assignments as a function of said present fuel flow values and present share values; said calculating means including a means for estimating a proportionate share value on one of said boilers and a fuel flow value for one of said at least two fuels, said calculating means, by use of said estimating means, calculates said optimal next values for each of said fuel and load assignments using a quantity of variables reduced in number relative to the quantity of said fuel and load assignments; and, means for implementing at least one of said optimal next values into said multi-boiler cogenerative type steam generating plant in one of an automatic and a manual mode of operation.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
64 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 1 further comprising a means for displaying said optimal next values, said displaying means cooperatively engaging said implementing means such that said optimal next values can be individually presented in at least one of a form of suggestion, an indication of automatic implementation, and a combination of both of said suggestion form and implementation indication.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
86 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 1 wherein said calculating means calculates at least one of said optimal next values based on periodically updated values representing a cost efficiency of each of said fuels with respect to the steam load being generated thereby, said calculating means further calculating said optimal next values based on said cost efficiency value of each of said fuels, a known cost factor for each of said fuels, and a known heating value associated with each of said fuels.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
66 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 1 wherein said estimating means estimates an optimal next value for said steam load share for one of said boilers by subtracting a summation of the calculated optimal next values of steam load share for the remaining of said boilers from the known value for the total steam load to be supplied by said steam generating plant.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
49 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 1 wherein said estimating means estimates an optimal next value for one of said at least two fuels based on a calculated fuel ratio between said at least two fuels and said calculated optimal next values for said fuel flow.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
57 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 1 further comprising a means for detecting the availability of each of said at least two fuels and disabling the operation of said calculating means with respect to calculating an optimal next value for any of said at least two fuels that have been determined to be unavailable.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
64 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 1 further comprising a means for detecting that one of said boilers is out of service and for disabling said calculating means with respect to an optimal next value for said any of said proportionate share values associated with said boilers when it has been determined that any of said boilers is out of service.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
66 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 1 further comprising a means for indicating that said present values of fuel flow and steam load have been updated according to the latest operating conditions of said steam generating plant and for preventing operation of said calculating means if said indicating means indicates an absence of updated present values of said fuel flow and steam load.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
157 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 1 further comprising timing means for storing a first count value representative of a first count of program operations that have been executed since the last operation of said calculating means and for initiating a new operation of said calculating means if said first count exceeds a preselected value and a condition exists whereby at least one of a change in equipment status associated with said steam generating plant has occurred and a change in said total steam load has been requested; said timing means further storing a second count value representative of a second count of program operations that have been executed since the last operation of said calculating means and further effective for initiating said new operation of said calculating means if said second count exceeds a second preselected value independent of the presence of said change in equipment status and change in steam load conditions.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
192 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 1 wherein said calculating means calculates said optimal next values by first setting said present values of fuel flow and steam load share as a base set of variables and generating a plurality of test cases for said set of variables, said plurality of test cases each containing a combination of said set of variables some of which are perturbed about said base set of variables by a predetermined magnitude and in a predetermined pattern, said calculating means further determining response values for each of said test cases and identifying a worst case response and a best case response from among said plurality of test cases and for subtracting said test case associated with said worst response from twice the mean value of the remaining test cases thereby resulting in a new set of variables on which said calculating means repeats said generation of said plurality of test cases, said determination of responses, and said subtraction of said test case associated with said worst response until such time as a change in values associated with said best response falls below a preselected value.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
26 words
An, economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 10 wherein said magnitude of said perturbation value decreases for each successive operation of said calculating, means.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
63 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 1 further comprising a means for preventing implementation of at least one of said optimal next values and reusing said stored present values of a corresponding at least one of said fuel flows and shares of steam load upon sensing that said at least one of said optimal next values exceeds a predetermined limit.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
49 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 3 wherein said, preventing means s further prevents implementation of at least one of said optimal next values when said implementing means indicates that a manual operation has been selected for said at least one of said optimal next values.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
54 words
An economical despatching arrangement as set forth in claim 12 .wherein said preventing means is further effective for preventing implementation of said optimal next values unless the cost improvement associated with said optimal next values exceeds a predetermined threshold value which is substantially higher than said present values of fuel flow and steam load.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4160362A
Cited
US4417438A
Cited
US4680927A
Cited
US4403293A
Cited
US4463574A
Cited
US4459098A
Cited
US4593365A
Cited
US4591988A
Cited
US4604714A
Cited
US4628462A
Cited
US4597256A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-02-14 | 1992-08-15 | 1993-02-14 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-02-14 | 1996-08-15 | 1997-02-14 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-02-14 | 2000-08-15 | 2001-02-14 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |