US4855253A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Test method for random defects in electronic microstructures
Assignee: HP Inc
•
Filing: 1988-01-29
•
Granted: 1989-08-08
•
Expires: 2008-01-29
Abstract
Abstract A method for testing layering processes of integrated circuit construction for random defects. A test structure is employed having a plurality of micro-patterns covering a wafer, the patterns being fabricated in accord with a unit process of an integrated circuit manufacturing operation. The patterns are fabricated either with a lower conductive level covered by an insulative layer and an upper conductive level, all having pads which may be probed at the upper level, or a single conductive layer. By repeating tests in various unit processes, random defects can be isolated to individual unit processes. Nine patterns are disclosed which form a universal test set.
Inventors
- 👤 Charles M. Weber
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 20:09
CPC Classifications
H; H10; H10P; H10P74/00; H10P74/27; H10P74/277; G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/28; G01R31/2851; G01R31/2884; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S438/00; Y10S438/942
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim
256 words
A method of testing an integrated circuit manufacturing process, which comprises a sequence of unit processes, for defects in a wafer produced by a process, the method comprising the steps of: providing a first and second reticle plates that are spaced apart and substantially parallel; providing a first electronic test pattern on the first reticle plate and a second electronic test pattern on the second reticle plate, with each electronic test pattern comprising a sequence of repeating subpatterns, with each sub-pattern comprising an array of die size patterns and with each die size pattern comprising an array of micro-patterns, where each micropattern on the first reticle plate lies closest to and directly opposite at least one corresponding micro-pattern on the second reticle plate, and where, for a micro-pattern on the first reticle plate and the corresponding micro-pattern on the second reticle plate, at least one of these micro-patterns includes an electrically conductive pattern and an electrical contact pad for activating this electrically conductive pattern; providing an electrically insulating layer of material between the first and second reticle plates; choosing each micro-pattern on the first reticle plate and the corresponding micro-pattern on the second reticle plate to test for the presence of defects in one of the unit processes that comprise the manufacturing process; activating the electrically conductive pattern or patterns for each pair of corresponding micro-patterns on the first and second reticle plates; and identifying the defects in each unit process according to the pairs of corresponding micro-patterns that are found to be inoperative when activated.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
256 words
A method of testing an integrated circuit manufacturing process, which comprises a sequence of unit processes, for defects in a wafer produced by a process, the method comprising the steps of: providing a first and second reticle plates that are spaced apart and substantially parallel; providing a first electronic test pattern on the first reticle plate and a second electronic test pattern on the second reticle plate, with each electronic test pattern comprising a sequence of repeating subpatterns, with each sub-pattern comprising an array of die size patterns and with each die size pattern comprising an array of micro-patterns, where each micropattern on the first reticle plate lies closest to and directly opposite at least one corresponding micro-pattern on the second reticle plate, and where, for a micro-pattern on the first reticle plate and the corresponding micro-pattern on the second reticle plate, at least one of these micro-patterns includes an electrically conductive pattern and an electrical contact pad for activating this electrically conductive pattern; providing an electrically insulating layer of material between the first and second reticle plates; choosing each micro-pattern on the first reticle plate and the corresponding micro-pattern on the second reticle plate to test for the presence of defects in one of the unit processes that comprise the manufacturing process; activating the electrically conductive pattern or patterns for each pair of corresponding micro-patterns on the first and second reticle plates; and identifying the defects in each unit process according to the pairs of corresponding micro-patterns that are found to be inoperative when activated.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 1 further defined by forming one of said micro-patterns from a double horizontal comb under a plate.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 1 further defined by forming one of said micro-patterns from a horizontal raster under a plate.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 1 further defined by forming one of said micro-patterns from a plate under a double horizontal comb.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 further defined by forming one of said micro-patterns from a plate under a plate.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 1 further defined by forming one of said micro-patterns from a single plate.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 1 further defined by forming one of said micro-patterns from a vertical serpentine under a plate.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 1 further defined by forming one of said micro-patterns from a double vertical comb under a double horizontal comb.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 1 further defined by forming one of said micro-patterns from a vertical raster under a horizontal raster.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 further defined by forming one of said micro-patterns from a double vertical digitated comb under a plate.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
159 words
A method of testing unit processes of an integrated circuit manufacturing series for random defects, where the unit processes are used for manufacturing wafers carrying integrated circuits, the method comprising the steps of: (a) simulating multi-level wires of an integrated circuit with electrically conductive first and second layers separated by a dielectric layer, where the conductive layers are established in first and second micro-patterns, respectively; (b) simulating other multi-level conductive first and second layers separated by a dielectric layer, where the conductive layers are established in a plurality of micro-patterns, with the plurality of micro-patterns forming die size patterns within a sub-pattern; (c) providing a test pattern on a wafer by repeating the test patterns over substantially all of the surface of the wafer; (d) fabricating the test pattern in a unit process in a similar manner as a wafer carrying integrated circuits is treated in the unit process; and (e) testing micro-structures formed by the micro-patterns for failure.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
159 words
A method of testing unit processes of an integrated circuit manufacturing series for random defects, where the unit processes are used for manufacturing wafers carrying integrated circuits, the method comprising the steps of: (a) simulating multi-level wires of an integrated circuit with electrically conductive first and second layers separated by a dielectric layer, where the conductive layers are established in first and second micro-patterns, respectively; (b) simulating other multi-level conductive first and second layers separated by a dielectric layer, where the conductive layers are established in a plurality of micro-patterns, with the plurality of micro-patterns forming die size patterns within a sub-pattern; (c) providing a test pattern on a wafer by repeating the test patterns over substantially all of the surface of the wafer; (d) fabricating the test pattern in a unit process in a similar manner as a wafer carrying integrated circuits is treated in the unit process; and (e) testing micro-structures formed by the micro-patterns for failure.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 11 further defined forming a micro-pattern with a single conductive plate.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said testing is by detecting opens and shorts in said conductive layers.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said conductive layers are formed by conductive lines having line widths which simulate the line widths of said integrated circuits.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said conductive layers are formed by conductive lines having spacings between lines which simulate the spacing between the lines of said integrated circuits.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 11 further defined by separating repeating from non-repeating defects and identifying nonrepeating defects as random defects.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 11 further defined by repeating steps (a)-(e) for other unit processes.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 11, further comprising the step of forming vias extending from said first layer to said second layer through said dielectric layer.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3810301A
Cited
US3808527A
Cited
US3983479A
Cited
US4144493A
Cited
US4347479A
Cited
US4386459A
Cited
US4538105A
Cited
US4465973A
Cited
US4475811A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-08-07 | 1993-02-06 | 1993-08-08 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-08-07 | 1997-02-06 | 1997-08-08 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-08-07 | 2001-02-06 | 2001-08-08 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |