← Back to Patent Explorer
US4874240A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Characterization of semiconductor resist material during processing

Assignee: Hoechst Celanese Chemical Co
•
Filing: 1988-03-01
•
Granted: 1989-10-17
•
Expires: 2008-03-01
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Several methods for evaluating certain changes induced in a film of semiconductor resist material after the coat process and before or at completion of the softbake process, by monitoring thickness of and absorption by a film of resist material.

Inventors

  • 👤 Michael P. C. Watts
  • 👤 Thiloma I. Perera
  • 👤 David W. Myers
  • 👤 Robert G. Ozarski
  • 👤 John F. Schipper
  • 👤 Raul V. Tan

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-30 22:34
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/16; G03F7/168

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim 312 words
A method for evaluating the quality of a semiconductor resist material produced by a softbake process, that contains a solute and a solvent and that is deposited as a substantially planar film on a substrate, the method comprising the steps of: determining the absorption a=1-e - α.sbsp.o L .sbsp.o (L o =single pass optical path length in the film of interest, if any) and absorption coefficient (αL) o of the substrate surface before the coat process begins, through a measurement of Total Reflectivity of the substrate surface for a predetermined wavelength λ, predetermined incidence angle θ 1 and known index of refraction of the substrate; depositing a resist film on the substrate at an estimated predetermined thickness; determining the thickness of the resist film through a measurement of Total Reflectivity of the resist film at each of a sequence of one or more predetermined wavelengths λ 1 , λ 2 , . . . , λ r at a sequence of one or more predetermined film incidence angles θ 1 ,1, θ 1 ,2, . . . , θ 1 ,s (with r+s≧3); determining the absorption of a=1-e - αL of the resist film after the coat process and before completion of the softbake process through a measurement of Total Reflectivity of the resist film for a predetermined wavelength λ, predetermined film incidence angle θ 1 , and predetermined film thickness h; forming the quantity Δ=αL-(αL) o for each of the sequenmce of combinations of substrate and resist film deposited thereon; comparing the value of Δ for each such combination with a predetermined target value Δ t ; performing the softbake process for each such combination; forming the quantity ρ=h/Δ for each of the sequence of combinations of substrate and resist film deposited thereon; and comparing the value of ρ for each such combination with a predetermined target value ρ t .
Claim 2
Independent Claim 312 words
A method for evaluating the quality of a semiconductor resist material produced by a softbake process, that contains a solute and a solvent and that is deposited as a substantially planar film on a substrate, the method comprising the steps of: determining the absorption a=1-e - α.sbsp.o L .sbsp.o (L o =single pass optical path length in the film of interest, if any) and absorption coefficient (αL) o of the substrate surface before the coat process begins, through a measurement of Total Reflectivity of the substrate surface for a predetermined wavelength λ, predetermined incidence angle θ 1 and known index of refraction of the substrate; depositing a resist film on the substrate at an estimated predetermined thickness; determining the thickness of the resist film through a measurement of Total Reflectivity of the resist film at each of a sequence of one or more predetermined wavelengths λ 1 , λ 2 , . . . , λ r at a sequence of one or more predetermined film incidence angles θ 1 ,1, θ 1 ,2, . . . , θ 1 ,s (with r+s≧3); determining the absorption of a=1-e - αL of the resist film after the coat process and before completion of the softbake process through a measurement of Total Reflectivity of the resist film for a predetermined wavelength λ, predetermined film incidence angle θ 1 , and predetermined film thickness h; forming the quantity Δ=αL-(αL) o for each of the sequenmce of combinations of substrate and resist film deposited thereon; comparing the value of Δ for each such combination with a predetermined target value Δ t ; performing the softbake process for each such combination; forming the quantity ρ=h/Δ for each of the sequence of combinations of substrate and resist film deposited thereon; and comparing the value of ρ for each such combination with a predetermined target value ρ t .
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 47 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein said step of determining said thickness of said resist film is carried out using a method drawn from the class consisting of the Reflectivity Inversion Method, the Reflectivity Versus Wavelength Variance Method, and the Reflectivity Versus Incidence Angle Variance Method.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein said step of determining said absorption of said resist film is carried out using a method drawn from the class consisting of the Simple Reflectivity Method and the Complex Reflectivity Method.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein said target value Δ t is the arithmetic mean of the values of said parameter Δ determined for said sequence of combinations of substrate and resist film.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein said target value ρ t is the arithmetic mean of the values of said parameter ρ determined for said sequence of combinations of substrate and resist film.
Claim 7
Independent Claim 310 words
A method for evaluating the quality of a semiconductor resist material, produced by a softbake process, that contains a solute and a solvent and that is deposited as a substantially planar film on a substrate, the method comprising the steps of: determining the absorption a=1-e - α.sbsp.o L .sbsp.o (L o =single pass optical path length in the film of interest, if any) and absorption coefficient (αL) o of the substrate surface before the coat process begins, through a measurement of Total Transmissivity of the substrate surface for a predetermined wavelength λ, predetermined incidence angle θ 1 and known index of refraction of the substrate; depositing a resist film on the substrate at an estimated predetermined thickness; determining the thickness of the resist film through a measurement of Total Reflectivity of the resist film at each of a sequence of one or more predetermined wavelengths λ 1 , λ 2 , . . . , λ r at a sequence of one or more predetermined film incidence angles θ 1 ,1, θ 1 ,2, . . . θ 1 ,s (with r+s≧3); determining the absorption a=1-e - αL of the resist film after the coat process and before completion of the softbake process through a measurement of Total Transmissivity of the resist film for a predetermined wavelength λ, predetermined film incidence angle θ 1 , and predetermined film thickness h; forming the quantity Δ=αL-(αL) o for each of the sequence of combinations of substrate and resist film deposited thereon; comparing the value of Δ for each such combination with a predetermined target value Δ t ; performing the softbake process for each such combination; forming the quantity ρ=h/Δ for each of the sequence of combinations of substrate and resist film deposited thereon; and comparing the value of ρ for each such combination with a predetermined target value ρ t .
Claim 8
Independent Claim 310 words
A method for evaluating the quality of a semiconductor resist material, produced by a softbake process, that contains a solute and a solvent and that is deposited as a substantially planar film on a substrate, the method comprising the steps of: determining the absorption a=1-e - α.sbsp.o L .sbsp.o (L o =single pass optical path length in the film of interest, if any) and absorption coefficient (αL) o of the substrate surface before the coat process begins, through a measurement of Total Transmissivity of the substrate surface for a predetermined wavelength λ, predetermined incidence angle θ 1 and known index of refraction of the substrate; depositing a resist film on the substrate at an estimated predetermined thickness; determining the thickness of the resist film through a measurement of Total Reflectivity of the resist film at each of a sequence of one or more predetermined wavelengths λ 1 , λ 2 , . . . , λ r at a sequence of one or more predetermined film incidence angles θ 1 ,1, θ 1 ,2, . . . θ 1 ,s (with r+s≧3); determining the absorption a=1-e - αL of the resist film after the coat process and before completion of the softbake process through a measurement of Total Transmissivity of the resist film for a predetermined wavelength λ, predetermined film incidence angle θ 1 , and predetermined film thickness h; forming the quantity Δ=αL-(αL) o for each of the sequence of combinations of substrate and resist film deposited thereon; comparing the value of Δ for each such combination with a predetermined target value Δ t ; performing the softbake process for each such combination; forming the quantity ρ=h/Δ for each of the sequence of combinations of substrate and resist film deposited thereon; and comparing the value of ρ for each such combination with a predetermined target value ρ t .
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 47 words
The method according to claim 6, wherein said step of determining said thickness of said resist film is carried out using a method drawn from the class consisting of the Reflectivity Inversion Method, the Reflectivity Versus Wavelength Variance Method, and the Reflectivity Versus Incidence Angle Variance Method.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method according to claim 6, wherein said step of determining said absorption of said resist film is carried out using a method drawn from the class consisting of the Simple Transmissivity Method and the Complex Transmissivity Method.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method according to claim 6, wherein said target value Δ t is the arithmetic mean of the values of said parameter Δ determined for said sequence of combinations of substrate and resist film.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method according to claim 6, wherein said target value ρ t is the arithmetic mean of the values of said parameter ρ determined for said sequence of combinations of substrate and resist film.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4669873A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1992-10-16 1993-04-17 1993-10-17 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1996-10-16 1997-04-17 1997-10-17 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2000-10-16 2001-04-17 2001-10-17 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag