US4893245A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Windshear guidance for aircraft having inertial sensor
Assignee: Honeywell Inc
•
Filing: 1988-01-11
•
Granted: 1990-01-09
•
Expires: 2008-01-11
Abstract
Abstract An aircraft guidance system for flying an optimal inertial flight path in a windshear encounter. Zero inertial flight path angle command is utilized as the basis for guidance commands for either horizontal or vertical windshears; the flight path angle command is constant regardless of the actual magnitude of the shear. The effect of the guidance law described is to provide a zero inertial flight path angle to prolong excitation of the aircraft's phugoid oscillatory mode. By utilizing inertial flight path angle derived from an inertial reference system, errors introduced by vertical gyroscope systems are eliminated and thus a very accurate flight path angle guidance law is produced. The described guidance control law maximizes the aircraft's time in the air during a windshear encounter. Protection against aircraft stall is also provided by using a computed variable maximum allowable angle of attack.
Inventors
- 👤 Terry L. Zweifel
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 17:54
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05D; G05D1/00; G05D1/04; G05D1/06; G05D1/0607; G05D1/0615
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
195 words
An aircraft flight path angle control system including an inertial reference system, comprising: means responsive to said inertial reference system for sensing an inertial flight path angle for the aircraft and producing a signal representative thereof; means for providing a signal representative of a predetermined flight angle, means responsive to said signals representative of an inertial flight path angle and a predetermined flight path angle for producing an algebraic difference thereof, means responsive to said difference for deriving an error signal, means for applying said error signal to said control system, means for providing a signal representative of stick shaker angle of attack, means for sensing the actual angle of attack of the aircraft and providing a signal representative thereof, means responsive to said signals representative of stick shaker angle of attack and actual angle of attack for forming an algebraic difference thereof, means for combining said error signal with said difference of stick shaker angle of attack and actual angle of attack to form a further difference thereof corresponding to a maximum safe angle of attack, and means for varying said error signal in accordance with a predetermined value of inertial angle of attack.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
195 words
An aircraft flight path angle control system including an inertial reference system, comprising: means responsive to said inertial reference system for sensing an inertial flight path angle for the aircraft and producing a signal representative thereof; means for providing a signal representative of a predetermined flight angle, means responsive to said signals representative of an inertial flight path angle and a predetermined flight path angle for producing an algebraic difference thereof, means responsive to said difference for deriving an error signal, means for applying said error signal to said control system, means for providing a signal representative of stick shaker angle of attack, means for sensing the actual angle of attack of the aircraft and providing a signal representative thereof, means responsive to said signals representative of stick shaker angle of attack and actual angle of attack for forming an algebraic difference thereof, means for combining said error signal with said difference of stick shaker angle of attack and actual angle of attack to form a further difference thereof corresponding to a maximum safe angle of attack, and means for varying said error signal in accordance with a predetermined value of inertial angle of attack.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
31 words
An aircraft flight control system as set forth in claim 1, further comprising means for varying said error signal in accordance with a fixed value of said inertial angle of attack.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
35 words
An aircraft flight control system as set forth in claim 2, further comprising means for varying said error signal as a function of the diversion of said inertial angle of attack from said fixed value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
28 words
An aircraft control system as set forth in claim 3, further comprising means for varying said error signal as a continuous function of said inertial angle of attack.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
57 words
An aircraft control system as set forth in claim 4, said means for varying said error signal further comprising limiter means responsive to values of said inertial flight path angle in excess of said predetermined value, said limiter means having an output that diminishes toward zero as said inertial flight path angle diminishes from said predetermined value.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
23 words
An aircraft flight control system as set forth in claim 5, further comprising automatic pilot control means coupled to receive said error signal.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
23 words
An aircraft flight control system as set forth in claim 6, further comprising flight director instrument means coupled to receive said error signal.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
56 words
An aircraft flight control system as set forth in claim 7, further comprising windshear detection means for applying said error signal to at least one of said automatic pilot means or said flight director instrument means when values of a vertical or horizontal windshear in excess of a predetermined threshold in time and duration are exceeded.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
43 words
An aircraft flight control system as set forth in claim 8, further comprising switch means for selectively applying said error signal or said output of said limiter means to at least one of said automatic pilot means or said flight director instrument means.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
117 words
An aircraft flight control system as set forth in claim 9, further comprising logic means responsive to a predetermined magnitude and polarity of said output of said limiter means, for applying said error signal to at least one of said automatic pilot means or said flight director instrument means when said difference of signals representative of stick shaker angle of attack and actual angle of attack is of a positive polarity indicative of a safe flight angle and for applying said output signal of said limiter means to at least one of said automatic pilot means or said flight director instrument means when said difference of signals is of a zero value or of a negative polarity.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3791208A
Cited
US4261537A
Cited
US4373184A
Cited
US4608641A
Cited
US4536843A
Cited
US4593285A
Cited
US4728951A
Cited
US4725811A
Cited
US4797674A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-01-08 | 1993-07-10 | 1994-01-09 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-01-08 | 1997-07-10 | 1998-01-09 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-01-08 | 2001-07-10 | 2002-01-09 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |