US4956780A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Flight path angle command flight control system for landing flare
Assignee: Boeing Co
•
Filing: 1989-07-27
•
Granted: 1990-09-11
•
Expires: 2009-07-27
Abstract
Abstract This invention provides a flare control modification for pilot-in-the-loop aircraft maneuver command electronic flight control systems. During flare pilot pitch control inputs are interpreted as incremental flight path angle commands above a reference flight path angle (nominally a -3° glideslope). The flare control modification allows conventional piloting technique (i.e., pitch controller pull-and-hold) to be used during flare, while retaining the benefits of the maneuver command system masking effects of gusts, winds, windshear, and variations in airplane weight, balance, and aerodynamic configuration.
Inventors
- 👤 Mithra M. K. V. Sankrithi
- 👤 Scott L. Pelton
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 14:00
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05D; G05D1/00; G05D1/04; G05D1/06; G05D1/0607; G05D1/0653; G05D1/0676
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 32
Claim 1
Independent Claim
122 words
In an aircraft maneuver command electronic flight control system wherein a continuing pitch axis control signal is produced by a continuing steady input applied to a pilot-operated pitch axis control device, the improvement comprising: altimeter means for determining the height of the aircraft above the ground and producing a related altimeter signal; and command modification means responsively connected to said pilot-operated pitch axis control device and to said altimeter means for receiving said pitch axis control signal and said altimeter signal and producing an incremental flight path angle command above a reference value based on the continuing steady input applied to said pilot-operated pitch axis control device, when the aircraft descends below a predetermined height above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
122 words
In an aircraft maneuver command electronic flight control system wherein a continuing pitch axis control signal is produced by a continuing steady input applied to a pilot-operated pitch axis control device, the improvement comprising: altimeter means for determining the height of the aircraft above the ground and producing a related altimeter signal; and command modification means responsively connected to said pilot-operated pitch axis control device and to said altimeter means for receiving said pitch axis control signal and said altimeter signal and producing an incremental flight path angle command above a reference value based on the continuing steady input applied to said pilot-operated pitch axis control device, when the aircraft descends below a predetermined height above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
49 words
The improvement claimed in claim 1, wherein: (a) said maneuver command electronic flight control system includes an integrator that integrates said pitch axis control signal; (b) said command modification means includes integration cancellation means for cancelling the effect of integrating said pitch axis control signal by bypassing said integrator.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
44 words
The improvement claimed in claim 1, wherein: (a) said maneuver command electronic flight control system includes an integrator that integrates said pitch axis control signal; and (b) said command modification means includes integration cancellation means comprising a differentiator connected in series with said integrator.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
15 words
The improvement claimed in claim 3, wherein, signalwise, said differentiator is upstream of said integrator.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
30 words
The improvement claimed in claim 4, wherein said integrator is set to a predetermined value when said aircraft descends below said predetermined height above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
41 words
The improvement claimed in claim 5, wherein said integrator is initialized by a value whose magnitude is dependent upon the position of said pitch axis control when said aircraft descends below said predetermined height above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
44 words
The improvement claimed in claims 3, 4, 5, or 6, wherein said differentiator is formed by changing a type zero (0) filter to a type negative one (-1) filter when said aircraft descends below said predetermined altitude above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
14 words
The improvement claimed in claim 7, wherein said filter is a first order filter.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
14 words
The improvement claimed in claim 7, wherein said filter is a second order filter.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
17 words
The improvement claimed in claim 7, wherein said type zero (0) filter has a simple unity gain.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
33 words
The improvement claimed in claim 7, wherein said reference value is dependent upon the altitude of the aircraft after the aircraft descends below a predetermined height above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
38 words
The improvement claimed in claim 11, wherein said reference value is dependent on the value of said pitch axis control signal immediately prior to said aircraft descending below said predetermined height above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
45 words
The improvement claimed in claim 11, wherein the sensitivity of said command modification means to changes in said pitch axis control signal is dependent upon the altitude of the aircraft after the aircraft descends below a predetermined height above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
25 words
The improvement claimed in claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6, wherein said command modification means includes pilot-operated means for altering said reference value.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
39 words
The improvement claimed in claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6, wherein said reference value is dependent upon the altitude of the aircraft after the aircraft descends below a predetermined height above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
38 words
The improvement claimed in claim 15, wherein said reference value is dependent on the value of said pitch axis control signal immediately prior to said aircraft descending below said predetermined height above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
45 words
The improvement claimed in claim 15, wherein the sensitivity of said command modification means to changes in said pitch axis control signal is dependent upon the altitude of the aircraft after the aircraft descends below a predetermined height above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
44 words
The improvement claimed in claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6, wherein said command modification means stops producing said incremental flight path angle command above a reference value when said aircraft ascends above a second predetermined height after descending below said predetermined height.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
30 words
The improvement claimed in claim 1, further comprising control means for driving the aircraft's actual incremental flight path angle above the reference to match said incremental flight path angle command.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
88 words
A method of controlling, during the flare portion of a landing maneuver, the pitch axis movement of an aircraft controlled by an aircraft maneuver command electronic flight control system, said method comprising the steps of: determining the height of the aircraft above the ground during a landing maneuver; and controlling an incremental flight path angle command relative to a reference value in response to the deflection of a pilot-operated pitch axis control device when the aircraft descends below a predetermined altitude above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
88 words
A method of controlling, during the flare portion of a landing maneuver, the pitch axis movement of an aircraft controlled by an aircraft maneuver command electronic flight control system, said method comprising the steps of: determining the height of the aircraft above the ground during a landing maneuver; and controlling an incremental flight path angle command relative to a reference value in response to the deflection of a pilot-operated pitch axis control device when the aircraft descends below a predetermined altitude above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
74 words
The method claimed in claim 20, wherein pitch axis movement of said aircraft during up-and-away flight is controlled by integrating pitch axis commands that are representative of the deflection of a pilot-operated pitch axis control device and wherein said step of controlling an incremental flight path angle command above a reference value is created by not integrating said pitch axis commands that are representative of the deflection of a pilot-operated pitch axis control device.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
71 words
The method claimed in claim 20, wherein pitch axis movement of said aircraft during up-and-away flight is controlled by integrating pitch axis commands that are representative of the deflection of a pilot-operated control device and wherein said step of controlling an incremental flight path angle command above a reference value is created by differentiating said pitch axis commands that are representative of the deflection of a pilot-operated pitch axis control device.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method claimed in claim 22, wherein said pitch axis commands that are representative of the deflection of a pilot-operated pitch axis control device are differentiated prior to said pitch axis commands being integrated.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method claimed in claim 23, wherein said pitch axis commands that are representative of the deflection of a pilot-operated pitch axis control device are filtered as well as differentiated.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method claimed in claim 24, wherein said pitch axis commands that are representative of the deflection of a pilot-operated control device are filtered by a first order filter.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method claimed in claim 24, wherein said pitch axis commands that are representative of the deflection of a pilot-operated control device are filtered by a second order filter.
Claim 29
Independent Claim
40 words
The method claimed in claims 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 or 26, wherein said reference value is dependent on the altitude of said aircraft after the aircraft descends below a predetermined altitude above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method claimed in claim 27, wherein the sensitivity of said response to the deflection of a pilot-operated pitch axis control device is dependent on the altitude of said aircraft after the aircraft descends below a predetermined altitude above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 31
Independent Claim
38 words
The method claimed in claims 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 or 26, wherein said reference value is set to an initial value when said aircraft descends below a predetermined altitude above the ground during a landing maneuver.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method claimed in claim 29, wherein said initial value is dependent on the state of said pilot-operated pitch axis control device just prior to said aircraft descending below a predetermined altitude above the ground during a landing maneuver.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2830291A
Cited
US3126474A
Cited
US3280310A
Cited
US3333795A
Cited
GB1178673A
Cited
US3604908A
Cited
US3578269A
Cited
US3626163A
Cited
US3743221A
Cited
US3652835A
Cited
US3801049A
Cited
US3916688A
Cited
US4037086A
Cited
US4413320A
Cited
US4633404A
Cited
US4589616A
Cited
US4638229A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-09-10 | 1994-03-12 | 1994-09-11 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-09-10 | 1998-03-12 | 1998-09-11 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-09-10 | 2002-03-12 | 2002-09-11 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |