Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 28
Claim 1
Independent Claim
216 words
A method for determining, with an accuracy better than 0.007%, expressed as Standard Error of Prediction, the concentration of urea in a concentration range of 0-0.1% in a milk sample containing at least 1% fat, at least 1% dissolved lactose, and at least 1% protein, by an infrared absorption measuring technique, said method comprising the steps of: (a) determining absorption in an infrared radiation waveband from 1000 cm -1 (10.0 μm) to 4000 cm -1 (2.50 μm) of the milk sample, wherein at least one determination is made in a waveband from 1000 cm -1 (10.0 μm) to 1800 cm -1 (5.56 μm) in which urea absorbs, wherein at least one determination is made in a waveband in which fat absorbs, wherein at least one determination is made in a waveband where lactose absorbs, and at least one determination is made in a waveband where protein absorbs; (b) determining, on the basis of said absorption determinations and predetermined parameters established by multivariate calibration, a contribution from fat, lactose, and protein in said waveband where urea absorbs, and (c) quantitatively assessing the concentration of urea in the milk sample on the basis of the absorption in the waveband where urea absorbs and on the basis of the determined contribution from fat, lactose, and protein in said waveband.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
216 words
A method for determining, with an accuracy better than 0.007%, expressed as Standard Error of Prediction, the concentration of urea in a concentration range of 0-0.1% in a milk sample containing at least 1% fat, at least 1% dissolved lactose, and at least 1% protein, by an infrared absorption measuring technique, said method comprising the steps of: (a) determining absorption in an infrared radiation waveband from 1000 cm -1 (10.0 μm) to 4000 cm -1 (2.50 μm) of the milk sample, wherein at least one determination is made in a waveband from 1000 cm -1 (10.0 μm) to 1800 cm -1 (5.56 μm) in which urea absorbs, wherein at least one determination is made in a waveband in which fat absorbs, wherein at least one determination is made in a waveband where lactose absorbs, and at least one determination is made in a waveband where protein absorbs; (b) determining, on the basis of said absorption determinations and predetermined parameters established by multivariate calibration, a contribution from fat, lactose, and protein in said waveband where urea absorbs, and (c) quantitatively assessing the concentration of urea in the milk sample on the basis of the absorption in the waveband where urea absorbs and on the basis of the determined contribution from fat, lactose, and protein in said waveband.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined parameters established by multivariate calibration are obtained using milk samples containing known concentrations of urea, or milk samples to which known concentrations of urea have been added.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
23 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein more than one determination is made in the wavebands where urea, fat, lactose, and protein absorb.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
35 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein concentrations of the components fat, lactose, and protein are predicted and each prediction is based on at least one measurement in a waveband in which the component absorbs.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
40 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the multivariate calibration is performed using milk samples containing known concentrations of urea, fat, lactose and/or protein, and/or milk samples to which known concentrations of urea, fat, lactose and/or protein have been added.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
27 words
A method according to claim 5, wherein the physical conditions (temperature, degree of homogenization) of the milk samples used to perform the multivariate calibration have been modified.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the multivariate calibration has been performed using at least 4 milk samples.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 7, wherein the multivariate calibration has been performed using at least 8 milk samples.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 8, wherein the multivariate calibration has been performed using at least 12 milk samples.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 9, wherein the multivariate calibration has been performed using at least 18 milk samples.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 10, wherein the multivariate calibration has been performed using at least 25 milk samples.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the Standard Error of Prediction (SEP) is better than 0.005%.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method according to claim 12, wherein the Standard Error of Prediction (SEP) is better than 0.004%.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one determination in which urea absorbs is made in the waveband from 1100 cm -1 (9.09 μm) to 1800 cm -1 (5.56 μm).
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method according to claim 14, wherein the at least one determination in which urea absorbs is made in the waveband from 1400 cm -1 (7.14 μm) to 1500 cm -1 (6.67 μm).
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method according to claim 14, wherein the at least one determination in which urea absorbs is made in the waveband from 1500 cm -1 (6.67 μm) to 1800 cm -1 (5.56 μm).
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method according to claim 14, wherein the at least one determination in which urea absorbs is made in the waveband from 1100 cm -1 (9.09 μm) to 1200 cm -1 (8.33 μm).
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
18 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the absorption determinations are performed in wavebands defined by optical filters.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the absorption determinations are performed in wavebands defined by stationary grating and movable and/or multiple detectors or by a movable grating and one or several stationary or movable detectors.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the absorption determinations are performed using a Fourier transform interferometer.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the absorption determinations are performed using an ATR technique.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the absorption determinations are made using a transmission technique.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method according to claim 22, wherein the infrared light is transmitted through a cuvette containing the milksample, a path length of the cuvette being at most 200 μm.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method according to claim 23, wherein the infrared light is transmitted through a cuvette containing the milk sample, the pathlength of the cuvette being at most 50 μm.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the multivariate calibration is performed by a method selected from the group consisting of Partial Least Squares algorithm, Principal Component Regression, Multiple Linear Regression, and Artificial Neural Network learning.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
23 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein any fat globules in the milk sample have a mean diameter of at most 3 μm.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
91 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein compensation for influence on the urea measurement is further performed for one or several of the following components: citric acid, free fatty acids, antibiotics, phosphates, somatic cells, bacteria, preservatives and casein, by performing, for each component, a determination of infrared absorption in a waveband in which the component absorbs, the compensation being performed on the basis of multivariate calibration by combining the results, for all components for which compensation is to be made, from the determinations made in the wavebands where the components absorb.