US5257402A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for effecting handoff in a multi-site communication system
Assignee: Motorola Solutions Inc
•
Filing: 1991-03-28
•
Granted: 1993-10-26
•
Expires: 2011-03-28
Abstract
Abstract A method of effecting handoff of a communicating communication unit from a first communication resource to a second communication resource. After determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made, the method makes determinations regarding relative levels of communication degradation that will likely occur when using different handoff methodologies to effect the handoff. In general, the method selects a particular handoff methodology that will provide a best level of handoff reliability while simultaneously posing at least no more than an acceptable level of communication degradation.
Inventors
- 👤 Kenneth J. Crisler
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 18:46
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04W; H04W36/00; H04W36/24; H04W36/26; H04W36/16
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim
131 words
A method of effecting handoff of a communicating communication unit from a first communication resource to a second communication resource, comprising the steps of: A) determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made; B) determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a first handoff methodology; C) determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to at least a second handoff methodology, which second handoff methodology is different than the first handoff methodology; D) selecting one of the handoff methodologies as a function of: i) likely reliability; and ii) acceptable communication degradation to provide a selected handoff methodology.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
131 words
A method of effecting handoff of a communicating communication unit from a first communication resource to a second communication resource, comprising the steps of: A) determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made; B) determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a first handoff methodology; C) determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to at least a second handoff methodology, which second handoff methodology is different than the first handoff methodology; D) selecting one of the handoff methodologies as a function of: i) likely reliability; and ii) acceptable communication degradation to provide a selected handoff methodology.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 1, and further including the step of: E) using the selected handoff methodology to handoff the communicating communication unit from the first communication resource to the second communication resource.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of selecting one of the handoff methodologies as a function of acceptable communication degradation includes the step of comparing the level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs with the handoff methodologies against at least one threshold value representing an unacceptable level of communication degradation.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second communication resources each comprise a radio frequency channel.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 4, wherein each of the radio frequency channels includes a least one predetermined frequency having a predetermined bandwidth.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 5, wherein each of the radio frequency channels are time division multiplexed to provide a plurality of time slots.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
84 words
The method of claim 6, wherein the steps of determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a first handoff methodology and determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a second handoff methodology each include the step of considering likely time slot assignments for the second communication resource with respect to time slot assignments for the first communication resource.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
100 words
The method of claim 3, wherein: the step of determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made includes the step of determining a level of current communication degradation for the first communication resource; and the step of comparing the level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs with the handoff methodologies against at least one threshold value includes the step of selecting the at least one threshold value as a function, at least in part, of the level of current communication degradation for the first communication resource.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
187 words
A method of effecting handoff of a communicating communication unit from a first communication resource to a second communication resource, comprising the steps of: A) determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made; B) determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a first handoff methodology; C) comparing the level of communication degradation with a predetermined threshold; D) when a first predetermined relationship exists between the level of communication degradation and the predetermined threshold, using the first handoff methodology to effect the handoff; E) when a second predetermined relationship exists between the level of communication degradation and the predetermined threshold: i) determining a new level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a second handoff methodology; ii) comparing the new level of communication degradation with the predetermined threshold; iii) when the first predetermined relationship exists between the new level of communication degradation and the predetermined threshold, using the second handoff methodology to effect the handoff.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
187 words
A method of effecting handoff of a communicating communication unit from a first communication resource to a second communication resource, comprising the steps of: A) determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made; B) determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a first handoff methodology; C) comparing the level of communication degradation with a predetermined threshold; D) when a first predetermined relationship exists between the level of communication degradation and the predetermined threshold, using the first handoff methodology to effect the handoff; E) when a second predetermined relationship exists between the level of communication degradation and the predetermined threshold: i) determining a new level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a second handoff methodology; ii) comparing the new level of communication degradation with the predetermined threshold; iii) when the first predetermined relationship exists between the new level of communication degradation and the predetermined threshold, using the second handoff methodology to effect the handoff.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method of claim 9, wherein: the step of determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made includes the step of determining a level of current communication degradation for the first communication resource; and the predetermined threshold is selected as a function, at least in part, of the level of current communication degradation for the first communication resource.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
197 words
A method of effecting handoff of a communicating communication unit from a first communication resource to a second communication resource, comprising the steps of: A) determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made; B) determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a first handoff methodology; C) comparing the level of communication degradation with a plurality of predetermined thresholds; D) when a first predetermined relationship exists between the level of communication degradation and the plurality of predetermined thresholds, using the first handoff methodology to effect the handoff; E) when a second predetermined relationship exists between the level of communication degradation and the plurality of predetermined thresholds: i) determining a new level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a second handoff methodology; ii) comparing the new level of communication degradation with the plurality of predetermined thresholds; iii) when the first predetermined relationship exists between the new level of communication degradation and the plurality of predetermined thresholds, using the second handoff methodology to effect the handoff.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
197 words
A method of effecting handoff of a communicating communication unit from a first communication resource to a second communication resource, comprising the steps of: A) determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made; B) determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a first handoff methodology; C) comparing the level of communication degradation with a plurality of predetermined thresholds; D) when a first predetermined relationship exists between the level of communication degradation and the plurality of predetermined thresholds, using the first handoff methodology to effect the handoff; E) when a second predetermined relationship exists between the level of communication degradation and the plurality of predetermined thresholds: i) determining a new level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource pursuant to a second handoff methodology; ii) comparing the new level of communication degradation with the plurality of predetermined thresholds; iii) when the first predetermined relationship exists between the new level of communication degradation and the plurality of predetermined thresholds, using the second handoff methodology to effect the handoff.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
74 words
The method of claim 9, wherein: the step of determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made includes the step of determining a level of current communication degradation for the first communication resource; and at least some of the plurality of predetermined thresholds are selected as a function, at least in part, of the level of current communication degradation for the first communication resource.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
178 words
A method of effecting handoff of a communicating communication unit from a first communication resource to a second communication resource, comprising the steps of: A) providing at least a first and a second handoff methodology for use in effecting the hand off, wherein the first handoff methodology comprises a more reliable handoff methodology than the second handoff methodology; B) determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made; C) determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource using the first handoff methodology; D) comparing the level of communication degradation with at least one predetermined threshold; E) when a first predetermined relationship exists between the level of communication degradation and the at least one predetermined threshold, using the first handoff methodology to effect the handoff; F) when the first predetermined relationship does not exist between the level of communication degradation and the at least one predetermined threshold, determining whether the second handoff methodology should be used to effect the handoff.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
178 words
A method of effecting handoff of a communicating communication unit from a first communication resource to a second communication resource, comprising the steps of: A) providing at least a first and a second handoff methodology for use in effecting the hand off, wherein the first handoff methodology comprises a more reliable handoff methodology than the second handoff methodology; B) determining that a handoff from the first communication resource to the second communication resource should likely be made; C) determining a level of communication degradation that will likely occur if handoff occurs to the second communication resource using the first handoff methodology; D) comparing the level of communication degradation with at least one predetermined threshold; E) when a first predetermined relationship exists between the level of communication degradation and the at least one predetermined threshold, using the first handoff methodology to effect the handoff; F) when the first predetermined relationship does not exist between the level of communication degradation and the at least one predetermined threshold, determining whether the second handoff methodology should be used to effect the handoff.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 13, wherein the first handoff methodology requires a greater exchange of control signalling than the second handoff methodology.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 14, wherein the first handoff methodology requires the communicating communication unit to test a candidate second communication resource.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-10-25 | 1997-04-26 | 1997-10-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-10-25 | 2001-04-26 | 2001-10-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-10-25 | 2005-04-26 | 2005-10-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |