US5279296A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus for detecting cataractogenesis
Assignee: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
•
Filing: 1991-01-04
•
Granted: 1994-01-18
•
Expires: 2011-01-04
Abstract
Abstract A method and an apparatus are disclosed for using quasielastic light scattering to determine the degree of cataractogenesis of a lens in vivo. By collecting and analyzing light scattered from the lens, it is possible, using the temporal autocorrelation function, to produce a signature of cataractogenesis, accounting for scattering due to immobile scatterers. The components of the cataractogenesis can also be detected by comparing the values of the components of the signature of cataractogenesis to frequency distribution of the components taken from populations or by detecting changes in the values of the components of the signature of cataractogenesis as a function of time.
Inventors
- 👤 George M. Thurston
- 👤 George B. Benedek
- 👤 Douglas L. Hayden
- 👤 Joyce A. Peetermans
- 👤 Victor G. Taratuta
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 22:29
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B3/00; A61B3/10; A61B3/117; A61B3/1173
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 24
Claim 1
Independent Claim
103 words
A method for in vivo detection of cataractogenesis in oscular tissue, comprising the steps of: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue, the scattered light having a fluctuating intensity; (d) performing a mathematical analysis on the intensity and the fluctuations of the intensity of the collected light, thereby determining a signature of cataractogenesis, the signature including the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; and (e) determining from the signature the degree of cataractogenesis.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
103 words
A method for in vivo detection of cataractogenesis in oscular tissue, comprising the steps of: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue, the scattered light having a fluctuating intensity; (d) performing a mathematical analysis on the intensity and the fluctuations of the intensity of the collected light, thereby determining a signature of cataractogenesis, the signature including the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; and (e) determining from the signature the degree of cataractogenesis.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 wherein step (d) comprises computing a temporal autocorrelation function of the fluctuations of the intensity of the collected light.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
116 words
A method for in vivo detection of cataractogenesis in ocular tissue, comprising the steps of: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue, the scattered light having a fluctuating intensity; (d) performing a mathematical analysis on the intensity and the fluctuations of the intensity of the collected light to determine a signature of cataractogenesis, the signature including the intensity (I mo ) of the light scattered by mobile scatterers, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; and (e) determining from the signature the degree of cataractogenesis.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
116 words
A method for in vivo detection of cataractogenesis in ocular tissue, comprising the steps of: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue, the scattered light having a fluctuating intensity; (d) performing a mathematical analysis on the intensity and the fluctuations of the intensity of the collected light to determine a signature of cataractogenesis, the signature including the intensity (I mo ) of the light scattered by mobile scatterers, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; and (e) determining from the signature the degree of cataractogenesis.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 3 wherein step (d) comprises computing a temporal autocorrelation function of the fluctuations of the intensity of the collected light.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
81 words
The method of claim 4 wherein step (d) further comprises performing a least squares analysis on the temporal autocorrelation function to determine the functional form of the function C(τ) which best fits the temporal autocorrelation function, where C(τ)=α.sub.0 [I.sub.mo f(τ)].sup.2 +[I.sub.mo +I.sub.imm ].sup.2, τ is a time delay variable, α 0 is a predetermined constant representative of scattering in the absence of immobile scatters, and f(τ) is a monotonically decreasing positive function in |τ| such that f(0)=1 and f(τ)→0 as |τ|→∞.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of: (f) determining the value of α 0 from in vitro experimentation in the absence of immobile scatterers.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 6 wherein step (f) comprises making correlation measurements on a solution of polystyrene spheres.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 6 wherein step (f) comprises making correlation measurements on a solution of material isolated from an ocular lens containing no mobile scatterers.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of: (f) making measurements of the value of α 0 on a population of individuals, the value of α 0 being selected as the maximum of the measured values.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
136 words
A method for in vivo detection of cataractogenesis in ocular tissue, comprising the steps of: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue; (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine a signature of cataractogenesis, the signature including the intensity (I mof ) of the light scattered by fast moving scatterers, the diffusion decay time (τ f ) of fast moving scatterers, the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by slow moving scatterers, the diffusion decay time (τ S ) of slow moving scatterers, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; and (e) determining from the signature the degree of cataractogenesis.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
136 words
A method for in vivo detection of cataractogenesis in ocular tissue, comprising the steps of: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue; (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine a signature of cataractogenesis, the signature including the intensity (I mof ) of the light scattered by fast moving scatterers, the diffusion decay time (τ f ) of fast moving scatterers, the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by slow moving scatterers, the diffusion decay time (τ S ) of slow moving scatterers, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; and (e) determining from the signature the degree of cataractogenesis.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 10 wherein step (d) comprises computing a temporal autocorrelation function of the collected light.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
67 words
The method of claim 11 wherein step (d) further comprises performing a least squares analysis on the temporal autocorrelation function to determine the functional form of the function C(τ) which best fits the temporal autocorrelation function, where C(τ)=α.sub.0 [I.sub.mof exp(-τ/τ.sub.f)+I.sub.mos exp(-τ/τ.sub.s)].sup.2 +[I.sub.mof +I.sub.mos +I.sub.imm ].sup.2, τ is a time delay variable, and α 0 is a predetermined constant representative of scattering in the absence of immobile scatterers.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 12, further comprising the step of: (f) determining the value of α 0 from in vitro experimentation in the absence of immobile scatterers.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 13 wherein step (f) comprises making correlation measurements on a solution of polystyrene spheres.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 13 wherein step (f) comprises making correlation measurements on a solution of material isolated from an ocular lens containing no mobile scatterers.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 12, further comprising the step of: (f) making measurements of the value of a parameter representative of light scattering from the ocular lens of each member of a population of individuals and choosing a value of α 0 to be the maximum of the measured values.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
261 words
A method for in vivo detection of cataractogenesis in ocular tissue of an individual subject, comprising the steps of: (1) For each subject in a population of subjects: (a) producing substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the subject's ocular tissue; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue; and (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine the values of variables which include the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by slow moving scatterers, the diffusion decay time (τ s ) of the slow moving scatterers, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; (2) developing a frequency distribution of at least one of the variables; (3) for the individual subject: (a) producing substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the individual subject's ocular tissue; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the individual subject's ocular tissue; and (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine the values of variables which include the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by slow moving scatterers, the diffusion decay time (τ s ) of the slow moving scatterers, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the individual subject's ocular tissue; and (4) determining a rate of cataractogenesis for the individual subject, based on the position of the value of at least one variable for the individual subject relative to the frequency distribution for that variable.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
261 words
A method for in vivo detection of cataractogenesis in ocular tissue of an individual subject, comprising the steps of: (1) For each subject in a population of subjects: (a) producing substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the subject's ocular tissue; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue; and (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine the values of variables which include the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by slow moving scatterers, the diffusion decay time (τ s ) of the slow moving scatterers, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; (2) developing a frequency distribution of at least one of the variables; (3) for the individual subject: (a) producing substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the individual subject's ocular tissue; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the individual subject's ocular tissue; and (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine the values of variables which include the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by slow moving scatterers, the diffusion decay time (τ s ) of the slow moving scatterers, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the individual subject's ocular tissue; and (4) determining a rate of cataractogenesis for the individual subject, based on the position of the value of at least one variable for the individual subject relative to the frequency distribution for that variable.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 17 wherein step (2) comprises developing a frequency distribution of exactly one of the variables.
Claim 23
Independent Claim
437 words
A method for in vivo detection of cataractogenesis in ocular tissue of an individual subject, comprising the steps of: (1) for the individual subject, at a first time: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue of the individual subject; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue of the individual subject; and (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine the values of variables, including the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by and the diffusion decay time (τ s ) of the slow moving scatterers in the individual subject's ocular tissue, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the individual subject's ocular tissue; (2) for the individual subject, at a second time following the first time: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue of the individual subject; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue of the individual subject; and (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine the values of variables, including the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by and the diffusion decay time (τ s ) of the slow moving scatterers in the subject's ocular tissue, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; (3) determining the rate of change of at least one of the variables of the individual subject's ocular tissue as a function of age; (4) for each individual in a population of individuals: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue of each individual subject; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue of each individual subject; and (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine normal values of the rate of change with individual age of the variables for the population, including the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by and the diffusion decay time (τ s ) of the slow moving scatterers in the subject's ocular tissue, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; and (5) comparing the rate of change with individual age of the at least one variable for the particular individual subject to the normal value of the rate of change with age of the at least one variable for the population of subjects to detect cataractogenesis in the ocular tissue of the individual subject.
Claim 24
Independent Claim
437 words
A method for in vivo detection of cataractogenesis in ocular tissue of an individual subject, comprising the steps of: (1) for the individual subject, at a first time: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue of the individual subject; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue of the individual subject; and (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine the values of variables, including the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by and the diffusion decay time (τ s ) of the slow moving scatterers in the individual subject's ocular tissue, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the individual subject's ocular tissue; (2) for the individual subject, at a second time following the first time: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue of the individual subject; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue of the individual subject; and (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine the values of variables, including the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by and the diffusion decay time (τ s ) of the slow moving scatterers in the subject's ocular tissue, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; (3) determining the rate of change of at least one of the variables of the individual subject's ocular tissue as a function of age; (4) for each individual in a population of individuals: (a) producing a substantially monochromatic, coherent, collimated light; (b) causing the light to impinge on the ocular tissue of each individual subject; (c) collecting light that is scattered from the ocular tissue of each individual subject; and (d) performing a correlation analysis on the collected light to determine normal values of the rate of change with individual age of the variables for the population, including the intensity (I mos ) of the light scattered by and the diffusion decay time (τ s ) of the slow moving scatterers in the subject's ocular tissue, and the intensity (I imm ) of the light scattered by immobile scatterers in the ocular tissue; and (5) comparing the rate of change with individual age of the at least one variable for the particular individual subject to the normal value of the rate of change with age of the at least one variable for the population of subjects to detect cataractogenesis in the ocular tissue of the individual subject.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4080264A
Cited
US4350163A
Cited
US4719912A
Cited
US4711542A
Cited
US4702576A
Cited
US4957113A
Cited
US5072731A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1997-01-17 | 1997-07-19 | 1998-01-18 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2001-01-17 | 2001-07-19 | 2002-01-18 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2005-01-17 | 2005-07-19 | 2006-01-18 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |