US5404305A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Control of pilot control station authority for a dual piloted flight control system
Assignee: RTX Corp
•
Filing: 1993-11-17
•
Granted: 1995-04-04
•
Expires: 2013-11-17
Abstract
Abstract In a dual station sidearm control system, a pilot control station provides pilot control signals in response to pilot activation of a pilot sidearm controller (210) and a co-pilot station provides co-pilot control signals in response to co-pilot activation of a co-pilot sidearm controller (211). The pilot control signals and the co-pilot control signals are combined (220) to provide dual station control signals for controlling aircraft attitude in the yaw, pitch, roll and lift attitude axes. A priority detector function (222) is responsive to pilot control signals in one of the attitude axes for reducing the priority of co-pilot control signals with respect to pilot control signals in the one attitude axis as the magnitude of pilot control signals increases in the one attitude axis. An attenuator function (225) is responsive to co-pilot control signals in the one attitude axis for attenuating the priority mismatch between pilot control signals and co-pilot control signals as the magnitude of co-pilot control signals increases in the one attitude axis.
Inventors
- 👤 Lorren Stiles, Jr.
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 08:01
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05D; G05D1/00; G05D1/08; G05D1/0808; G05D1/0858; B; B64; B64C; B64C13/00; B64C13/02; B64C13/04; B64C13/042; B64C13/0421
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim
185 words
A system for controlling the priority of control signals received from a pilot control station and a co-pilot control station in a dual piloted aircraft, the control signals being used to provide dual station control signals for controlling aircraft attitude in at least one attitude axis, the pilot control station providing pilot control signals in response to pilot activation of a pilot sidearm controller, the co-pilot station providing co-pilot control signals in response to co-pilot activation of a co-pilot sidearm controller, the system being characterized by: priority means responsive to said pilot control signals for providing priority signals, the magnitude of said priority signals being related to the magnitude of said pilot control signals; attenuator means responsive to said co-pilot control signals for providing attenuation signals, the magnitude of said attenuation signals being related to the magnitude of said co-pilot control signals; co-pilot priority means responsive to said co-pilot control signals, said priority signals and said attenuation signals for providing modified co-pilot control signals; and means responsive to said pilot controls signals and said modified co-pilot control signals for providing said dual station control signals.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
185 words
A system for controlling the priority of control signals received from a pilot control station and a co-pilot control station in a dual piloted aircraft, the control signals being used to provide dual station control signals for controlling aircraft attitude in at least one attitude axis, the pilot control station providing pilot control signals in response to pilot activation of a pilot sidearm controller, the co-pilot station providing co-pilot control signals in response to co-pilot activation of a co-pilot sidearm controller, the system being characterized by: priority means responsive to said pilot control signals for providing priority signals, the magnitude of said priority signals being related to the magnitude of said pilot control signals; attenuator means responsive to said co-pilot control signals for providing attenuation signals, the magnitude of said attenuation signals being related to the magnitude of said co-pilot control signals; co-pilot priority means responsive to said co-pilot control signals, said priority signals and said attenuation signals for providing modified co-pilot control signals; and means responsive to said pilot controls signals and said modified co-pilot control signals for providing said dual station control signals.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
60 words
A system for controlling the priority of control signals according to claim 1 wherein the magnitude of said priority signals increases in response to an increase in the magnitude of said pilot control signals, said co-pilot priority means being responsive to an increase in the magnitude of said priority signals for reducing the magnitude of said modified co-pilot control signals.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
31 words
A system for controlling the priority of control signals according to claim 2 wherein the magnitude of said priority signals is exponentially related to the magnitude of said pilot control signals.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
60 words
A system for controlling the priority of control signals according to claim 1 wherein the magnitude of said attenuation signals increases in response to an increase in the magnitude of said co-pilot control signals, said co-pilot priority means being responsive to an increase in the magnitude of said attenuation signals for increasing the magnitude of said modified co-pilot control signals.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
31 words
A system for controlling the priority of control signals according to claim 4 wherein the magnitude of said attenuation signals is directly related to the magnitude of said co-pilot control signals.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
57 words
A system for controlling the priority of control signals according to claim 1 wherein the magnitude of said dual station control signals is equal to the sum of said pilot control signals and said co-pilot control signals when said pilot control signals and said co-pilot control signals are in the same direction in a given attitude axis.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
43 words
A system for controlling the priority of control signals according to claim 1 wherein the magnitude of said dual station control signals is equal to said co-pilot control signals when the magnitude of said pilot control signals is less than a threshold magnitude.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
27 words
A system for controlling the priority of control signals according to claim 7 wherein said threshold magnitude corresponds to said pilot controller being in a detent position.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
22 words
A system for controlling the priority of control signals according to claim 1 wherein said pilot and co-pilot controllers are sidearm controllers.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
189 words
A dual station sidearm control system having a pilot control station for providing pilot control signals in response to pilot activation of a pilot sidearm controller and a co-pilot station for providing co-pilot control signals in response to co-pilot activation of a co-pilot sidearm controller, said pilot control signals and said co-pilot control signals being combined to provide dual station control signals for controlling aircraft attitude in the yaw, pitch, roll and lift attitude axes, said system including: priority means responsive to said pilot control signals in one of said attitude axes for reducing the priority of said co-pilot control signals with respect to said pilot control signals in said one of said attitude axes as the magnitude of said pilot control signals increases in said one of said attitude axes; characterized by the improvement comprising: attenuator means responsive to said co-pilot control signals in said one of said attitude axes for attenuating the priority mismatch between said pilot control signals and said co-pilot control signals in said one of said attitude axes as the magnitude of said co-pilot control signals increases in said one of said attitude axes.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
189 words
A dual station sidearm control system having a pilot control station for providing pilot control signals in response to pilot activation of a pilot sidearm controller and a co-pilot station for providing co-pilot control signals in response to co-pilot activation of a co-pilot sidearm controller, said pilot control signals and said co-pilot control signals being combined to provide dual station control signals for controlling aircraft attitude in the yaw, pitch, roll and lift attitude axes, said system including: priority means responsive to said pilot control signals in one of said attitude axes for reducing the priority of said co-pilot control signals with respect to said pilot control signals in said one of said attitude axes as the magnitude of said pilot control signals increases in said one of said attitude axes; characterized by the improvement comprising: attenuator means responsive to said co-pilot control signals in said one of said attitude axes for attenuating the priority mismatch between said pilot control signals and said co-pilot control signals in said one of said attitude axes as the magnitude of said co-pilot control signals increases in said one of said attitude axes.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
55 words
A dual station sidearm control system according to claim 10 wherein the magnitude of said dual station control signals in said one of said attitude axes is equal to said co-pilot control signals when the magnitude of said pilot control signals is less than a second threshold magnitude in said one of said attitude axes.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
33 words
A dual station sidearm control system according to claim 11 wherein said second threshold magnitude corresponds to said pilot sidearm controller being in a detent position in said one of said attitude axes.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
39 words
A dual station sidearm control system according to claim 11 wherein the priority of said co-pilot control signals decreases exponentially with respect to increases in the magnitude of said pilot control signals in said one of said attitude axes.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
91 words
A dual station sidearm control system according to claim 10 wherein said priority means is responsive to the magnitude of said pilot control signals being less than a first threshold magnitude for providing co-pilot input signals approximately equivalent priority as said pilot input signals in said one of said attitude axes, and responsive to the magnitude of said pilot control signals being greater than said first threshold magnitude for reducing the priority of said co-pilot input signals with respect to said pilot input signals in said one of said attitude axes.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
39 words
A dual station sidearm control system according to claim 14 wherein the priority of said co-pilot control signals decreases exponentially with respect to increases in the magnitude of said pilot control signals in said one of said attitude axes.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
78 words
A dual station sidearm control system according to claim 14 wherein the magnitude of said dual station control signals in said one of said attitude axes is equal to said co-pilot control signals when the magnitude of said pilot control signals is less than a second threshold magnitude in said one of said attitude axes, and said second threshold magnitude corresponds to said pilot sidearm controller being in a detent position in said one of said attitude axes.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
62 words
A dual station sidearm control system according to claim 10 wherein the magnitude of said dual station control signals in said one of said attitude axes is equal to the sum of said pilot control signals and said co-pilot control signals when said pilot control signals and said co-pilot control signals are in the same direction in one of said attitudes axes.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3987986A
Cited
US4114843A
Cited
US4420808A
Cited
US4716399A
Cited
US4688443A
Cited
US4865277A
Cited
US4914976A
Cited
US5002241A
Cited
US5125602A
Cited
US5076517A
Cited
US5137234A
Cited
US5190243A
Cited
US5149023A
Cited
US5291113A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-04-03 | 1998-10-03 | 1999-04-04 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-04-03 | 2002-10-03 | 2003-04-04 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-04-03 | 2006-10-03 | 2007-04-04 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |