US5500689A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System for detecting a video signal image intensity gradient
Assignee: Technicolor USA Inc
•
Filing: 1994-10-26
•
Granted: 1996-03-19
•
Expires: 2014-10-26
Abstract
Abstract In a video signal processor including a motion compensated predictive coding data compression system, three adjacent image frames (1, 2, 3) are analyzed to detect a luminance gradient such as is typically associated with image fading. The frames are similarly divided into several segments (A . . . L). The sum of the absolute pixel value differences between corresponding segments from adjacent frames is obtained for each of two pairs adjacent frame segments (DIFF 1-2 ; DIFF 2-3 ). The ratio of the two frame differences (S) is obtained for each segment. Fading is indicated if the ratio remains substantially constant for all or a predetermined number of regions. If fading is detected, any motion vectors generated by the motion coder are assigned a zero value and are not coded.
Inventors
- 👤 Wai-Man Lam
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 04:39
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04N; H04N5/00; H04N5/14; H04N5/144; H04N5/145
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim
153 words
In a system for processing an image representative signal, a method for detecting an image intensity gradient among a plurality of image frames including first and second adjacent pairs of adjacent frames, said method comprising the steps of: (A) partitioning each of said plurality of frames into a predetermined similar arrangement of segments; (B) summing pixel intensity differences between similarly located pixels for a given segment of a first adjacent pair of said adjacent frames, for producing a first difference signal; (C) summing pixel intensity differences between similarly located pixels for said given segment of a second adjacent pair of said adjacent frames, for producing a second difference signal; (D) determining the ratio of the values of said first and second difference signals; (E) repeating steps (B)-(D) for remaining ones of said segments (B-L); and (F) generating an indicator signal when said ratio is substantially constant for a predetermined number of said segments.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
153 words
In a system for processing an image representative signal, a method for detecting an image intensity gradient among a plurality of image frames including first and second adjacent pairs of adjacent frames, said method comprising the steps of: (A) partitioning each of said plurality of frames into a predetermined similar arrangement of segments; (B) summing pixel intensity differences between similarly located pixels for a given segment of a first adjacent pair of said adjacent frames, for producing a first difference signal; (C) summing pixel intensity differences between similarly located pixels for said given segment of a second adjacent pair of said adjacent frames, for producing a second difference signal; (D) determining the ratio of the values of said first and second difference signals; (E) repeating steps (B)-(D) for remaining ones of said segments (B-L); and (F) generating an indicator signal when said ratio is substantially constant for a predetermined number of said segments.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
A method according to claim 1 in a system including an image motion processing network for generating motion vectors, comprising the further step of zeroing said motion vectors in response to said indicator signal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
42 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said first pair of adjacent frames is prior in time to said second pair of adjacent frames, wherein said ratio determining step determines the ratio of said second difference signal to said first difference signal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
32 words
A method according to claim 1 further including the step of obtaining the absolute value of pixel intensity differences; and wherein said summing steps sum the absolute value of pixel intensity differences.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
154 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein each of said plurality of image frames is constituted by an odd image field and an even image field, and wherein said summing step (B) sums pixel intensity differences between similarly located pixels for a given segment of both said odd and even fields of said first pair of adjacent frames, for producing a first odd field difference signal and a first even field difference signal; said summing step (C) sums pixel intensity differences between similarly located pixels for a given segment of both said odd and even fields of said second pair of adjacent frames, for producing a second odd field difference signal and a second even field difference signal; and said determining step determines a first ratio of the values of said first and second odd field difference signals, and a second ratio of the values of said first and second even field difference signals.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
66 words
A method according to claim 5, wherein said first pair of adjacent frames is prior in time to said second pair of adjacent frames; and said ratio determining step determines a first ratio of said second odd field difference signal to said first odd field difference signal, and determines a second ratio of said second even field difference signal to said first even field difference signal.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
48 words
A method according to claim 1 and further including the step of determining if a predetermined number of summed differences in steps (B) and (C) are approximately equal to zero; and performing said step (D) if said predetermined number of summed differences are not approximately equal to zero.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-03-19 | 1999-09-18 | 2000-03-19 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-03-19 | 2003-09-18 | 2004-03-19 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-03-19 | 2007-09-18 | 2008-03-19 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |