US5585277A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Screening method for identifying ligands for target proteins
Assignee: Anadys Pharmaceuticals Inc
•
Filing: 1995-03-21
•
Granted: 1996-12-17
•
Expires: 2015-03-21
Abstract
Abstract A novel method for screening chemical compounds, test ligands, for potential pharmaceutical effectiveness. The disclosed method identifies possible therapeutic test ligands by placing them in the presence of target proteins and determining the ability of test ligands to increase the ratio of folded target protein to unfolded target protein. This differs significantly from known methods of novel pharmaceutical testing in that the biochemical function of the target protein need not be known and, except for one of the five embodiments of the method, the existence of any known ligands of the target protein is unnecessary.
Inventors
- 👤 James U. Bowie
- 👤 Andrew A. Pakula
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-03 11:26
CPC Classifications
C; C40; C40B; C40B30/00; C40B30/04; G; G01; G01N; G01N33/00; G01N33/48; G01N33/50; G01N33/53; G01N33/536; G01N33/68; G01N33/6803; G01N33/6845; G01N33/94
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim
193 words
A method for rapid, large-scale screening to identify a ligand that binds to a predetermined target protein, comprising the steps (a) selecting as test ligands a plurality of compounds not known to bind to the target protein; (b) incubating each of said test ligands and the target protein to produce a test combination; (c) incubating the target protein in the absence of a test ligand to produce a control combination; (d) treating the test and control combinations to cause the target protein in the control combination to unfold to a measurable extent; (e) determining the extent to which the target protein occurs in the folded state, the unfolded state or both in the test combination and in the control combination; (f) comparing the determination made in step (e) between the test and control combinations, wherein if the target protein is present in the folded state to a greater extent in the test combination than in the control combination, the test ligand is a ligand that binds to the target protein; and (g) repeating steps (b)-(f) with a plurality of said test ligands until a ligand that binds to the target protein is identified.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
193 words
A method for rapid, large-scale screening to identify a ligand that binds to a predetermined target protein, comprising the steps (a) selecting as test ligands a plurality of compounds not known to bind to the target protein; (b) incubating each of said test ligands and the target protein to produce a test combination; (c) incubating the target protein in the absence of a test ligand to produce a control combination; (d) treating the test and control combinations to cause the target protein in the control combination to unfold to a measurable extent; (e) determining the extent to which the target protein occurs in the folded state, the unfolded state or both in the test combination and in the control combination; (f) comparing the determination made in step (e) between the test and control combinations, wherein if the target protein is present in the folded state to a greater extent in the test combination than in the control combination, the test ligand is a ligand that binds to the target protein; and (g) repeating steps (b)-(f) with a plurality of said test ligands until a ligand that binds to the target protein is identified.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
57 words
The method of claim 1, wherein in step (d), determining the extent to which target protein occurs in the folded state, the unfolded state, or both is carried out by a method selected from the group consisting of proteolysis, antibody binding, surface binding, molecular chaperone binding, differential binding to immobilized ligand and differential formation of aggregated protein.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
106 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the determining step comprises the steps of: (i) incubating the target protein, each of said test ligands and one or more proteases which preferentially degrade target protein in its unfolded state, whereby the target protein in its unfolded state is degraded preferentially; and (ii) measuring the fraction of the target protein degraded or the fraction of the target protein remaining in an intact state, wherein if the fraction of target protein remaining in the intact state in the test combination is greater than in the control combination, then the test ligand is a ligand that binds to the target protein.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
105 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the determining step comprises the steps of: (i) combining the target protein and each of said test ligands; (ii) exposing the target protein and the test ligand mixture to a surface which preferentially binds unfolded target protein, whereby unfolded target protein binds to the surface; and (iii) determining the fraction of the target protein bound to the surface or the fraction of the target protein remaining unbound, wherein if the fraction of target protein remaining unbound is greater in the test combination, than in the control combination, the test ligand is a ligand that binds to the target protein.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
94 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the determining step comprises the steps of: (i) combining the target protein and each of said test ligands on a surface to which a known ligand of the target protein has been immobilized; and (ii) determining the fraction of the target protein bound to the surface or the fraction of the target protein remaining unbound wherein the fraction of target protein bound to the surface is greater in the test combination than in the control combination, the test ligand is a ligand that binds to the target protein.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the determining step comprises using antibodies that distinguish between the folded form and the unfolded form of the target protein.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
78 words
A method as in claim 6, wherein the determining step further comprises the steps of: (i) coating a surface with the target protein in its unfolded state or with peptide fragments of the target protein; (ii) incubating an antibody directed against the unfolded state of the target protein in the presence of both the target protein and each of said test ligands; and (iii) determining the amount of the antibody bound to or remaining unbound to the surface.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
64 words
The method of claim 6, wherein the determining step comprises the steps of: (i) coating a surface with a specific antibody directed against the denatured state of the target protein; (ii) incubating the target protein in the presence of each of said test ligands on the surface; and (iii) determining the fraction of the target protein bound to or not bound to the surface.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
74 words
The method of claim 6, wherein the determining step comprises the steps of: (i) coating a surface with an antibody capable of binding only the denatured state of the target protein; (ii) incubating the target protein in the presence of each of said test ligands and an antibody directed against only the native state of the target protein; and (iii) determining the presence of the target protein bound or remaining unbound to the surface.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
72 words
The method of claim 6, wherein the determining step comprises the steps of: (i) coating a surface with an antibody capable of binding the native state of the target protein; (ii) incubating the target protein in the presence of each of said test ligands and an antibody directed against the denatured state of the target protein; and (iii) determining the presence of the target protein bound or remaining unbound to the surface.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
73 words
The method of claim 6, wherein the determining step comprises the steps of: (i) coating a surface with an antibody capable of binding the denatured state of the target protein; (ii) incubating the target protein in the presence of each of said test ligands and an antibody directed against only the folded state of the target protein; and (iii) determining the presence of the target protein bound or remaining unbound to the surface.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the determining step comprises determining the amount of target protein bound to a molecular chaperone protein or not bound to a molecular chaperone protein.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method of claim 12, wherein the determining step comprises the steps of: (i) coating a surface with a molecular chaperone protein; (ii) incubating the target protein and each of said test ligands on the coated plate; and (iii) determining the amount of the target protein bound to or remaining unbound to the surface.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
69 words
The method of claim 12, wherein the determining step comprises the steps of: (i) coating a surface with the target protein in a denatured state; (ii) incubating a purified form of the target protein in the presence of each of said test ligands and a molecular chaperone protein on the surface; and (iii) determining the amount of the molecular chaperone protein remaining unbound to or binding to the surface.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
65 words
The method of claim 12, wherein the determining step comprises the steps of: (i) coating a surface with antisera capable of binding to the folded target protein; (ii) incubating the target protein in the presence of a molecular chaperone and each of said test ligands on the surface; and (iii) determining the amount of the target protein binding to or remaining unbound to the surface.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the determining step comprises determining differential formation of aggregated protein using a method selected from the group consisting of: (i) measuring the amount of aggregated protein; (ii) measuring the amount of soluble protein and measuring the rate of formation of aggregated protein.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
188 words
A method for rapid, large-scale screening to identify a ligand that binds predetermined target protein, comprising the steps of: (a) selecting as test ligands a plurality of compounds not known to bind m the target protein; (b) incubating each of said test ligands and the target protein under conditions appropriate for the target protein to unfold to a measurable extent, thereby producing a test combination; (c) incubating the target protein as in step (b), but in the absence of a test ligand, to produce a control combination; (d) determining the extent to which the target protein occurs in the folded state, the unfolded sate or both in the test combination and in the control combination; (e) comparing the determination made in step (d) between the test and control combinations, wherein if the target protein is present in the folded state to a greater extent in the test combination than in the control combination, the test ligand is a ligand that binds to the target protein; and (f) repeating steps (b)-(e) with a plurality of said test ligands until a ligand that binds to the target protein is identified.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
188 words
A method for rapid, large-scale screening to identify a ligand that binds predetermined target protein, comprising the steps of: (a) selecting as test ligands a plurality of compounds not known to bind m the target protein; (b) incubating each of said test ligands and the target protein under conditions appropriate for the target protein to unfold to a measurable extent, thereby producing a test combination; (c) incubating the target protein as in step (b), but in the absence of a test ligand, to produce a control combination; (d) determining the extent to which the target protein occurs in the folded state, the unfolded sate or both in the test combination and in the control combination; (e) comparing the determination made in step (d) between the test and control combinations, wherein if the target protein is present in the folded state to a greater extent in the test combination than in the control combination, the test ligand is a ligand that binds to the target protein; and (f) repeating steps (b)-(e) with a plurality of said test ligands until a ligand that binds to the target protein is identified.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
No citation records indexed.
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-12-17 | 2000-06-17 | 2000-12-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-12-17 | 2004-06-17 | 2004-12-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-12-17 | 2008-06-17 | 2008-12-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |