US5670326A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Reiterative method for screening combinatorial libraries
Assignee: Genzyme Corp
•
Filing: 1995-06-07
•
Granted: 1997-09-23
•
Expires: 2015-06-07
Abstract
Abstract Libraries of compounds such as nucleic acids or peptides are contacted with a target molecule and libraries that have at least one compound that bind with at least a minimum activity are determined by a reiterative process in which a change in the rate of recovery (elimination) of compounds that bind to the target indicates that the library contains such a compound. The procedure may also be used to determine indirectly the sequence of such compound by employing sublibraries, each of which have a known entity at a known position of the compound.
Inventors
- 👤 Bruce A. Beutel
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 22:25
CPC Classifications
C; C07; C07K; C07K1/00; C07K1/04; C07K1/047; C07H; C07H21/00; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S435/00; Y10S435/962
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
221 words
A process for screening a library to determine whether or not said library contains at least one compound that binds to a target molecule with at least a predetermined binding affinity, comprising: (a) contacting a library of compounds with a target molecule said compounds being selected from the group consisting of polymers and non-polymers and when said compound is a polymer said compound is other than an oligonucleotide, said contacting being a repeated contacting without amplification and under conditions that permit binding to the target molecule those compounds in the library which bind to the target molecule with at least the predetermined binding affinity and that eliminate from the library those compounds which do not bind to the target molecule with at least the predetermined binding affinity, said repeated contacting being with compounds of the library which have not been eliminated; and (b) determining during said contacting whether there is at least one of (i) a decrease in the percentage of compounds in the library which do not bind to the target molecule, or (ii) an increase in the percentage of compounds in the library which bind to the target molecule, with a change in one of said percentages indicating that said library contains at least one compound that binds to the target molecule with at least the predetermined binding affinity.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
221 words
A process for screening a library to determine whether or not said library contains at least one compound that binds to a target molecule with at least a predetermined binding affinity, comprising: (a) contacting a library of compounds with a target molecule said compounds being selected from the group consisting of polymers and non-polymers and when said compound is a polymer said compound is other than an oligonucleotide, said contacting being a repeated contacting without amplification and under conditions that permit binding to the target molecule those compounds in the library which bind to the target molecule with at least the predetermined binding affinity and that eliminate from the library those compounds which do not bind to the target molecule with at least the predetermined binding affinity, said repeated contacting being with compounds of the library which have not been eliminated; and (b) determining during said contacting whether there is at least one of (i) a decrease in the percentage of compounds in the library which do not bind to the target molecule, or (ii) an increase in the percentage of compounds in the library which bind to the target molecule, with a change in one of said percentages indicating that said library contains at least one compound that binds to the target molecule with at least the predetermined binding affinity.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
70 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the repeated contacting is a reiterative procedure involving a plurality of rounds and the determining of step (b) is effected by determining the percentage of compounds in the library which bind to the target molecule in at least two of the rounds and comparing said percentages to determine whether there is an increase in the percentage of compounds which bind to the target molecule.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
13 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the repeated contacting is effected by dialysis.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
12 words
The process of claim 1 wherein said target molecule is a protein.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
27 words
The process of claim 1 wherein said repeated contacting comprises recovering compounds which bind to the target molecule and recontacting the recovered compounds with the target molecule.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
11 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the compound is a polymer.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
18 words
The process of claim 6 wherein the monomeric units are amino acids and the polymer is a peptide.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
10 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the compounds are labeled.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
65 words
The process of claim 1 wherein in step (b) a decrease in the percentage of compounds in the library which do not bind to the target molecule is determined by measuring the percentage of compounds present in the library which do not bind to the target molecule at least twice during said repeated contacting, and comparing said percentage to determine a decrease in said percentage.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-09-22 | 2001-03-24 | 2001-09-23 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-09-22 | 2005-03-24 | 2005-09-23 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-09-22 | 2009-03-24 | 2009-09-23 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |