US5696733A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for verifying the location of an array of sensors
Assignee: Westerngeco LLC
•
Filing: 1996-10-30
•
Granted: 1997-12-09
•
Expires: 2016-10-30
Abstract
Abstract A high-order polynomial regression curve is fitted to a global set of first arrival times as a function of the nominal ranges between a plurality of acoustic sources having known geodetic coordinates and a plurality of acoustic detectors whose coordinates are imperfectly known. The order of the polynomial is chosen to be that order that minimizes the variance of the parameters about the regression curve. The polynomial is used as a quasi-velocity function for iteratively optimizing the best estimate of the ranges between each detector and every source station. The best estimate of the detector position is derived by multi-lateration using the computed ranges.
Inventors
- 👤 Noel Donald Zinn
- 👤 Ronald Edward Chambers
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 07:46
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V1/00; G01V1/38; G01V1/3817; G01V1/3835
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
287 words
A method for defining the real locations of the members of an array of detectors, comprising: a) depositing the detectors at nominal locations, D i , the detectors being in communication with a seismic signal processing system; b) causing an acoustic source to sequentially visit each of a plurality of source stations occupying known geodetic locations S j , and to launch an acoustic wavefield therefrom; c) determining a set of nominal ranges, R n i ,j between every known source location, S j , and every nominal detector location, D i ; d) measuring, with said signal processing system, detector-signal travel times representative of the minimum wavefield travel times between every known source station and every nominal detector location to define a set of pick times, P i ,j corresponding to said set of nominal ranges R n i ,j ; e) with the aid of the signal processing system, fitting a global polynomial regression curve of the R n i ,j on the P i ,j ; f) for every pick time P i ,j, selecting a detector specific velocity trend from said polynomial regression curve to define a set of detector-specific computed ranges, R c i ,j ; g) for every pick time P j ,i, selecting a source-specific velocity trend from said polynomial regression curve to define a set of source-specific computed ranges R c j ,i. h) using the sets of computed ranges, multi-laterating the detectors to a new re-positioned detector location; i) substituting the computed ranges from step h) for the nominal ranges in step c), iteratively executing steps d) through h) until the difference between a new repositioned detector location and a previously-defined detector location converges to a predefined limit.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
287 words
A method for defining the real locations of the members of an array of detectors, comprising: a) depositing the detectors at nominal locations, D i , the detectors being in communication with a seismic signal processing system; b) causing an acoustic source to sequentially visit each of a plurality of source stations occupying known geodetic locations S j , and to launch an acoustic wavefield therefrom; c) determining a set of nominal ranges, R n i ,j between every known source location, S j , and every nominal detector location, D i ; d) measuring, with said signal processing system, detector-signal travel times representative of the minimum wavefield travel times between every known source station and every nominal detector location to define a set of pick times, P i ,j corresponding to said set of nominal ranges R n i ,j ; e) with the aid of the signal processing system, fitting a global polynomial regression curve of the R n i ,j on the P i ,j ; f) for every pick time P i ,j, selecting a detector specific velocity trend from said polynomial regression curve to define a set of detector-specific computed ranges, R c i ,j ; g) for every pick time P j ,i, selecting a source-specific velocity trend from said polynomial regression curve to define a set of source-specific computed ranges R c j ,i. h) using the sets of computed ranges, multi-laterating the detectors to a new re-positioned detector location; i) substituting the computed ranges from step h) for the nominal ranges in step c), iteratively executing steps d) through h) until the difference between a new repositioned detector location and a previously-defined detector location converges to a predefined limit.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method as defined by claim 1, comprising: filtering the sets of pick times P i ,j, P j ,i and the range sets R i ,j and R j ,i prior to executing step h).
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method as defined by claim 2, comprising: selecting for execution, the order of said polynomial which minimizes the variance of the residuals about the regression curve.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as defined by claim 1, comprising: rejecting wavefield arrivals falling inside a critical distance from the set of refracted pick times prior to executing step d).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method as defined by claim 1, wherein: the detector locations are known and the source-station-locations are imperfectly known.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method as defined by claim 1, wherein: said detectors are deposited on an earth formation beneath a body of water so that the pick times are representative of wavefield propagation along shallow refracted trajectories.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method as defined by claim 1, further comprising: truncating said polynomial between preselected range limits to minimize contamination of said pick times by undesired transients.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
313 words
A method for estimating the actual locations of the members of an array of detectors beneath a body of water, comprising: a) depositing the detectors at nominal locations, D i , on the bottom of the body of water; b) providing means for transmitting detector signals to a seismic signal processing system; c) causing an acoustic source near the surface of the water to sequentially visit each of a plurality of source stations at known geodetic locations S j , and to launch an acoustic wavefield therefrom; d) by coordinate inversion, determining a set of nominal ranges, R n i ,j between every known source location S j , and every nominal detector location, D i ; e) measuring, with said signal processing system, detector-signal travel times representative of the minimum wavefield travel times between every known source station and every nominal detector location to define a set of pick times, P i ,j corresponding to said set of nominal ranges R n i ,j ; f) with the aid of the signal processing system, fitting a high-order global polynomial regression curve of the R n i ,j on the P i ,j ; g) for every pick time P i ,j, selecting a detector specific velocity trend from the aforesaid polynomial regression curve to define a set of detector-specific computed ranges R c i ,j ; h) for every pick time P j ,i, selecting a source-specific velocity trend from said polynomial regression curve to define a set of source-specific computed ranges R c j ,i i) using the sets of computed ranges, multi-laterating the respective detectors to new re-positioned detector locations; j) substituting the computed ranges from step h) for the nominal ranges in step d), iteratively executing steps e) through i) until the difference between a new repositioned detector location and a previously-defined detector location converges to a predefined limit.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
313 words
A method for estimating the actual locations of the members of an array of detectors beneath a body of water, comprising: a) depositing the detectors at nominal locations, D i , on the bottom of the body of water; b) providing means for transmitting detector signals to a seismic signal processing system; c) causing an acoustic source near the surface of the water to sequentially visit each of a plurality of source stations at known geodetic locations S j , and to launch an acoustic wavefield therefrom; d) by coordinate inversion, determining a set of nominal ranges, R n i ,j between every known source location S j , and every nominal detector location, D i ; e) measuring, with said signal processing system, detector-signal travel times representative of the minimum wavefield travel times between every known source station and every nominal detector location to define a set of pick times, P i ,j corresponding to said set of nominal ranges R n i ,j ; f) with the aid of the signal processing system, fitting a high-order global polynomial regression curve of the R n i ,j on the P i ,j ; g) for every pick time P i ,j, selecting a detector specific velocity trend from the aforesaid polynomial regression curve to define a set of detector-specific computed ranges R c i ,j ; h) for every pick time P j ,i, selecting a source-specific velocity trend from said polynomial regression curve to define a set of source-specific computed ranges R c j ,i i) using the sets of computed ranges, multi-laterating the respective detectors to new re-positioned detector locations; j) substituting the computed ranges from step h) for the nominal ranges in step d), iteratively executing steps e) through i) until the difference between a new repositioned detector location and a previously-defined detector location converges to a predefined limit.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method as defined by claim 8, comprising: minimizing undesired transient contamination of the pick times by limiting acceptance by said polynomial of only source-specific and detector-specific ranges within preselected maximum and minimum range limits.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method as defined by claim 9, comprising: filtering the sets of pick times P i ,j, P j ,i and the sets of ranges R i ,j, R j ,i prior to executing step i).
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method as defined by claim 8, comprising: limiting the range maxima to confine acceptable pick times to those that are representative of wavefields propagating along refracted trajectories that are shallow with respect to the water bottom.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-12-08 | 2001-06-09 | 2001-12-09 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-12-08 | 2005-06-09 | 2005-12-09 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-12-08 | 2009-06-09 | 2009-12-09 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |