← Back to Patent Explorer
US5774883A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method for selecting a seller's most profitable financing program

Assignee: AUTO DATA Inc
•
Filing: 1995-05-25
•
Granted: 1998-06-30
•
Expires: 2015-05-25
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A transaction management system and method of validating the sale of an asset. The system may be used by a vehicle dealership to evaluate a customer's credit risk, budgetary factors, and profitability of the sale during negotiations for sale of a vehicle, thereby facilitating the sale from both the customer's and dealership's point of view by properly structuring the transaction. The system enables the dealer to pool front-end and back-end profit items to maximize profits. The system performs expert functions to funnel the customer's credit information into a best fit with one of a plurality of specific finance program tiers.

Inventors

  • 👤 Lloyd R. Andersen
  • 👤 Gregory P. Smith

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-01 12:33
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q30/00; G06Q30/06; G06Q40/00; G06Q40/03; G06Q40/04

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim 133 words
In a data processing unit having a memory and capable of executing software code, a method of selecting a seller's best profit financial program from a rank ordered, plurality of financial programs, comprising the steps of: (1) providing a sales price of an asset; (2) retrieving credit information unique to a customer from the memory; (3) retrieving one or more credit questions from the memory; (4) receiving a credit answer, indicative of the customer, responsive to each of the credit questions; (5) automatically selecting one of the predetermined rank ordered financial programs based upon the credit information and the credit answers; and (6) iterating steps (3) through (5) multiple times until a seller's best profit financial program is selected, wherein the selected financial program may be different than a previously selected financial program.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 133 words
In a data processing unit having a memory and capable of executing software code, a method of selecting a seller's best profit financial program from a rank ordered, plurality of financial programs, comprising the steps of: (1) providing a sales price of an asset; (2) retrieving credit information unique to a customer from the memory; (3) retrieving one or more credit questions from the memory; (4) receiving a credit answer, indicative of the customer, responsive to each of the credit questions; (5) automatically selecting one of the predetermined rank ordered financial programs based upon the credit information and the credit answers; and (6) iterating steps (3) through (5) multiple times until a seller's best profit financial program is selected, wherein the selected financial program may be different than a previously selected financial program.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method defined in claim 1, wherein the credit information includes a number communicated from a central database external to said data processing unit.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method defined in claim 1, wherein a selected one said credit question is "More than one bankruptcy?".
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method defined in claim 3, wherein the credit answer to the selected one credit question is "No".
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 31 words
The method defined in claim 1, wherein the rank ordering of the financial programs depends on a maximum advance percentage and the seller's best profit financial program has the highest profit.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method defined in claim 1, additionally comprising the step of providing budget information about the customer.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method defined in claim 1, wherein the step of retrieving one or more credit questions from the memory is determined, in art by the credit information.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4736294A Cited
US4812628A Cited
US4774664A Cited
US4914587A Cited
US4742457A Cited
US4953085A Cited
US4876648A Cited
US5180309A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2001-06-29 2001-12-29 2002-06-30 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2005-06-29 2005-12-29 2006-06-30 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2009-06-29 2009-12-29 2010-06-30 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag