US5835627A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System and method for automatically optimizing image quality and processing time
Assignee: Intellectual Ventures I LLC
•
Filing: 1997-05-20
•
Granted: 1998-11-10
•
Expires: 2017-05-20
Abstract
Abstract An image processing system and method for processing an input image provides a virtual observer for automatically selecting, ordering and implementing a sequence of image processing operations which will yield maximum customer satisfaction as measured by a customer satisfaction index (CSI) which, for example, can balance the image quality and the processing time. The CSI evaluates an effect of the sequence of image processing operations on the input image in response to upstream device characteristic data received from an input device profile, downstream device characteristic data received from an output device profile, host configuration data, user selection data, trial parameter values and data corresponding to the sequence of image processing operations. In a preferred embodiment, the effect is evaluated in accordance with predetermined psychovisual attributes of the input image as attained and codified by human observers who have subjectively selected a most pleasing test image corresponding to objective metrics of the predetermined psychovisual attributes.
Inventors
- 👤 Eric W. Higgins
- 👤 Bror O. Hultgren, III
- 👤 F. Richard Cottrell
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 22:13
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T5/00; G06T5/73; G06T5/70; G06T2207/00; G06T2207/20; G06T2207/20048; G06T2207/20052
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
178 words
A digital image processing system to transform input image data representing an input image into processed image data representing a rendered image, said digital image processing system comprising: means for automatically generating image processing parameter information corresponding to an optimized customer satisfaction index for evaluating an effect of a sequence of image processing operations on the input image data in response to image source characteristic data received from an input device profile, downstream device characteristic data received from an output device profile, host configuration data, user selection data, trial parameter values and data corresponding to said sequence of image processing operations, said effect evaluated in accordance with predetermined psychovisual attributes of the input image as attained and codified by human observers who have subjectively selected a most pleasing test image corresponding to objective metrics of said predetermined psychovisual attributes; means for generating the processed image data by applying said image processing parameter information to the input image data; and means for generating the rendered image having said optimized customer satisfaction index in response to the processed image data.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
178 words
A digital image processing system to transform input image data representing an input image into processed image data representing a rendered image, said digital image processing system comprising: means for automatically generating image processing parameter information corresponding to an optimized customer satisfaction index for evaluating an effect of a sequence of image processing operations on the input image data in response to image source characteristic data received from an input device profile, downstream device characteristic data received from an output device profile, host configuration data, user selection data, trial parameter values and data corresponding to said sequence of image processing operations, said effect evaluated in accordance with predetermined psychovisual attributes of the input image as attained and codified by human observers who have subjectively selected a most pleasing test image corresponding to objective metrics of said predetermined psychovisual attributes; means for generating the processed image data by applying said image processing parameter information to the input image data; and means for generating the rendered image having said optimized customer satisfaction index in response to the processed image data.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
43 words
The system as recited in claim 1, wherein said means for automatically generating image processing parameter information is defined as a virtual observer, and said customer satisfaction index is optimized by said virtual observer by a tradeoff between image quality and processing time.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
151 words
The system as recited in claim 2, wherein said means for automatically generating image processing parameter information further comprises: means for generating reference values in response to said image source characteristic data, said downstream device characteristic data, said trial parameter values and said data corresponding to a sequence of image processing operations; means for generating said data corresponding to a sequence of image processing operations in response to said trial parameter values; means for generating processing time data in response to image size data, said host configuration data, and said data corresponding to a sequence of image processing operations; means for generating said objective metrics in response to said reference values; means for generating customer satisfaction index data in response to said objective metrics and said processing time data; and means for generating both said trial parameters and said image processing parameter data in response to said customer satisfaction index data.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
56 words
The system of claim 3, wherein said means for generating processing time data comprises: means for generating polling data in response to said image size data, said host configuration data, and said data corresponding to a predefined sequence of image processing operations; and means for generating said processing time data in response to said polling data.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
20 words
The system of claim 1, wherein said predetermined psychovisual attributes comprise sharpness, graininess, noise, luminance, color, tone and aspect ratio.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
53 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the input image is represented by a multi-dimensional array of pixels, each pixel being associated with a corresponding point of the input image, the input image data comprising, for each said pixel, a digital data value defining an intensity of a corresponding point on the input image.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
27 words
The system of claim 6 in which the digital data value for each said pixel further defines a color of said corresponding point on the input image.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
169 words
An image processing method comprising the step of transforming input image data representing an input image into processed image data representing a rendered image comprising the steps of: automatically generating image processing parameter information corresponding to an optimized customer satisfaction index for evaluating an effect of a sequence of image processing operations on input image in response to image source characteristic data received from an input device profile, downstream device characteristic data received from an output device profile, host configuration data user selection data, trial parameter values and data corresponding to said sequence of image processing operations, said effect evaluated in accordance with predetermined psychovisual attributes of the input image attained and codified by human observers who have subjectively selected a most pleasing test image corresponding to objective metrics of said predetermined psychovisual attributes; generating the processed image data by applying said image processing parameter information to the input image data; and generating the rendered image having said optimized customer satisfaction index in response to the processed image data.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
169 words
An image processing method comprising the step of transforming input image data representing an input image into processed image data representing a rendered image comprising the steps of: automatically generating image processing parameter information corresponding to an optimized customer satisfaction index for evaluating an effect of a sequence of image processing operations on input image in response to image source characteristic data received from an input device profile, downstream device characteristic data received from an output device profile, host configuration data user selection data, trial parameter values and data corresponding to said sequence of image processing operations, said effect evaluated in accordance with predetermined psychovisual attributes of the input image attained and codified by human observers who have subjectively selected a most pleasing test image corresponding to objective metrics of said predetermined psychovisual attributes; generating the processed image data by applying said image processing parameter information to the input image data; and generating the rendered image having said optimized customer satisfaction index in response to the processed image data.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 8, wherein said customer satisfaction index is determined tradeoff between image quality and processing time during said step of automatically generating image processing parameter information.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
143 words
The method of claim 8, wherein the step of automatically generating image processing parameter information further comprises the steps of: generating reference values in response to said image source characteristic data, said downstream device characteristic data, said trial parameter values and said data corresponding to a predefined sequence of image processing operations; generating said data corresponding to a predefined sequence of image processing operations in response to said trial parameter values; generating processing time data in response to image size data, said host configuration data, and said data corresponding to a predefined sequence of image processing operations; generating said objective metrics in response to said reference values; generating customer satisfaction index data in response to said objective metrics and said processing time data; and generating both said trial parameters and said image processing parameter data in response to said customer satisfaction index data.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method of claim 10, wherein said step of generating processing time data comprises: generating polling data in response to said image size data, said host configuration data, and said data corresponding to a predefined sequence of image processing operations; and generating said processing time data in response to said polling data.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 8, wherein said predetermined psychovisual attributes include sharpness, graininess, noise, luminance, color, tone and aspect ratio.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 8, wherein the input image is represented by a multi-dimensional array of pixels, each pixel being associated with a corresponding point of the input image, the input image data comprising, for each said pixel, a digital data value defining an intensity of a corresponding point on the input image.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 13 in which the digital data value for each said pixel further defines a color of said corresponding point on the input image.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4459613A
Cited
JPS61208577A
Cited
JPS61251966A
Cited
US4831434A
Cited
JPS63303471A
Cited
JPH02292681A
Cited
EP0414415A2
Cited
US4969040A
Cited
EP0428790A1
Cited
US5218434A
Cited
US5048095A
Cited
EP0473414A2
Cited
US5181259A
Cited
EP0583055A2
Cited
US5694484A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-11-09 | 2002-05-11 | 2002-11-10 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-11-09 | 2006-05-11 | 2006-11-10 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-11-09 | 2010-05-11 | 2010-11-10 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |