US5836876A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus for determining bone density and diagnosing osteoporosis
Assignee: Washington University in St. Louis
•
Filing: 1995-03-31
•
Granted: 1998-11-17
•
Expires: 2015-03-31
Abstract
Abstract The density of a discrete piece of hard tissue such as a bone in a patient may be determined by either of two methods. In a first method, an impulse of energy is introduced into the tissue, and the resulting vibration in the hard tissue is sensed and analyzed to compute the modal damping factor of the tissue, the modal damping factor being directly related to the density of the tissue. In a second method, a continuous energy input is introduced into the hard tissue. The resulting vibration in the tissue is measured with a mechano-electrical vibration transducer and a modal damping factor is calculated. The electro-mechanical vibration transducer of the preferred embodiment measures the pressure with which the transducer is pressed against the patient's flesh and only produces the continuous energy input when a predetermined pressure is achieved which is sufficient to prevent any significant vibration of the flesh surrounding the bone. Further, the transducer signals the user if too great a pressure is applied to the patient's flesh. An algorithm is used with a microprocessor to estimate the modal damping factor of the hard tissue by varying several parameters until the difference between the measured response of the hard tissue and a theoretical response is minimized.
Inventors
- 👤 Andrew D. Dimarogonas
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 00:56
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/45; A61B5/4504; A61B5/4509; A61B5/0048; A61B5/0051; A61B9/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
100 words
A method for estimating a modal damping factor of a bone positioned within the flesh in an organism, the method comprising the steps of: dynamically isolating the bone from the flesh; vibrating the isolated bone at a plurality of frequencies and through a plurality of cycles of displacement at each of the plurality of frequencies, each of the plurality of cycles of displacement having a substantially constant amplitude at each of the plurality of frequencies; measuring the amplitude at which the bone vibrates at each of the plurality of frequencies; and calculating the modal damping factor from the measured amplitudes.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
100 words
A method for estimating a modal damping factor of a bone positioned within the flesh in an organism, the method comprising the steps of: dynamically isolating the bone from the flesh; vibrating the isolated bone at a plurality of frequencies and through a plurality of cycles of displacement at each of the plurality of frequencies, each of the plurality of cycles of displacement having a substantially constant amplitude at each of the plurality of frequencies; measuring the amplitude at which the bone vibrates at each of the plurality of frequencies; and calculating the modal damping factor from the measured amplitudes.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
106 words
The method of claim 1 wherein: the step of calculating the modal damping factor includes the steps of: assuming a modal damping factor, a damped natural frequency and a maximum amplitude; calculating a theoretical amplitude at each of the plurality of frequencies from the assumed modal damping factor, the assumed damping natural frequency and the assumed maximum amplitude; comparing the theoretical amplitudes with the measured amplitudes; adjusting the assumed modal damping factor, the assumed damped natural frequency and the assumed maximum amplitude; and repeating the steps of calculating, comparing and adjusting until the theoretical amplitudes and the measured amplitudes are within a predetermined level of agreement.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
93 words
The method of claim 2 wherein: the step of comparing the theoretical amplitudes with the measured amplitudes includes the steps of: subtracting one of the theoretical and measured amplitudes from the other of the theoretical and measured amplitudes at each of the plurality of frequencies to obtain a difference at each of the plurality of frequencies; squaring the differences at each of the plurality of frequencies to obtain a sum at each of the plurality of frequencies; and adding each of the sums together to obtain a summation over all of the frequencies.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
189 words
The method of claim 2 wherein: the step of adjusting the assumed modal damping factor, the assumed damped natural frequency and the assumed maximum amplitude includes the steps of: calculating a first representative error by comparing the theoretical amplitude obtained from the first assumed modal damping factor with the measured amplitude; incrementing the first assumed modal damping factor to obtain a second assumed modal damping factor; calculating a second theoretical amplitude from the second assumed modal damping factor; subtracting the first assumed modal damping factor from the second assumed modal damping factor to obtain a difference in assumed modal damping factor; calculating a second representative error by comparing the second theoretical amplitude obtained from the second assumed modal damping factor with the measured amplitude; subtracting the first representative error from the second representative error to obtain a difference in representative error; multiplying the difference in assumed modal damping factor by the first representative error to obtain a quantity; dividing the quantity by the difference in representative error to obtain a quotient; and calculating an adjusted assumed modal damping factor by subtracting the quotient from the assumed modal damping factor.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
76 words
A device for determining an integrity of a discrete piece of hard tissue in a human, said device including a contact element adapted to contact a portion of a patient's body, a vibrator coupled to said contact element, a displacement sensor for measuring the displacement of said contact element, an indicator, and a pressure sensor for activating said indicator when the pressure between said device and said portion of the patient's body exceeds a predetermined limit.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
76 words
A device for determining an integrity of a discrete piece of hard tissue in a human, said device including a contact element adapted to contact a portion of a patient's body, a vibrator coupled to said contact element, a displacement sensor for measuring the displacement of said contact element, an indicator, and a pressure sensor for activating said indicator when the pressure between said device and said portion of the patient's body exceeds a predetermined limit.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
The device of claim 5 further comprising a connector for coupling at least one of said vibrator and said displacement sensor to a microprocessor.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
9 words
The device of claim 6 further comprising a microprocessor.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
36 words
The device of claim 5 wherein said contact element includes a spring-mounted rod, said pressure sensor includes a limit switch actuated by said rod, and said vibrator is configured to induce reciprocating motion in said rod.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
11 words
The device of claim 5 wherein said predetermined limit is adjustable.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
19 words
The device of claim 5 further comprising a force sensor for measuring the force applied to said contact element.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3744299A
Cited
US3847141A
Cited
US4361154A
Cited
US4799498A
Cited
US5006984A
Cited
US4754763A
Cited
US4976267A
Cited
US4941474A
Cited
US4926870A
Cited
US5143069A
Cited
WO1991006245A1
Cited
US5195532A
Cited
US5210704A
Cited
US5348009A
Cited
US5402781A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-11-16 | 2002-05-18 | 2002-11-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-11-16 | 2006-05-18 | 2006-11-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-11-16 | 2010-05-18 | 2010-11-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |