US5948032A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Polynomial windowing algorithm for impact responsive activation
Assignee: Ford Global Technologies LLC
•
Filing: 1997-03-24
•
Granted: 1999-09-07
•
Expires: 2017-03-24
Abstract
Abstract Polynomial functions of acceleration and time are used to develop an air bag activation decision. The polynomial functions include windowing constraints, a spike detector to detect the oscillatory signal in side impacts, and an above bias delay detector to help detect low speed impacts.
Inventors
- 👤 Matthew Huang
- 👤 Parag Jitendra Parikh
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 04:07
CPC Classifications
B; B60; B60R; B60R21/00; B60R21/01; B60R21/013; B60R21/0132; B60R2021/0002; B60R2021/0006
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 5
Claim 1
Independent Claim
162 words
A method for activating an impact responsive device in a vehicle having an associated single point accelerometer and control module, comprising sensor processing cycle steps of: discriminating to provide a prediction on when to activate by using a polynomial windowing function of acceleration and time of a signal at a single point sensor location so the polynomial function for acceleration is not monotonically increasing; and using a positive spike detector defining a positive spike either to be a positive acceleration preceded by a deceleration or a positive acceleration value above some preset spike magnitude wherein the number of positive spikes is termed a positive spike count, and an above bias delay detector where the above bias delay detector counts the number of consecutive acceleration samples above a bias value and sets a delay proportional to this number where the device will not activate for this amount of time, defined as an above bias delay, for dynamic side impact and soft crash discrimination.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
162 words
A method for activating an impact responsive device in a vehicle having an associated single point accelerometer and control module, comprising sensor processing cycle steps of: discriminating to provide a prediction on when to activate by using a polynomial windowing function of acceleration and time of a signal at a single point sensor location so the polynomial function for acceleration is not monotonically increasing; and using a positive spike detector defining a positive spike either to be a positive acceleration preceded by a deceleration or a positive acceleration value above some preset spike magnitude wherein the number of positive spikes is termed a positive spike count, and an above bias delay detector where the above bias delay detector counts the number of consecutive acceleration samples above a bias value and sets a delay proportional to this number where the device will not activate for this amount of time, defined as an above bias delay, for dynamic side impact and soft crash discrimination.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
73 words
A method for activating an impact responsive device in the vehicle as recited in claim 1, further comprising the steps of: using the spike detector in order to detect an oscillatory signal in a side impact situation; and using the above bias delay detector to help detect low speed no activate situations to allow a sensor to keep processing even if the sensor knows that it should not activate in the near future.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
138 words
A method as recited in claim 2, further comprising the steps of: continuously sampling an accelerometer output, a(t), for acceleration below the bias value; setting the sensor time, t, to 0 when a value is found below the bias value where sensor time is the time since the beginning of a processing cycle; setting a stop time to a predetermined minimum sensor duration; determining whether a(t) minus the bias value is negative, then a sensor output, S(t), is computed as a function of the acceleration multiplied by a function of the sensor time t; sensing a number of consecutive samples above bias and setting the "above bias count" to 0, if a(t) is below the acceleration bias value; setting the stop time further in the future; and continuing to check for reasons to reset or to continue processing.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
91 words
A method as recited in claim 3, further comprising the steps of: setting a maximum positive spike count; checking a "positive spike count" against the maximum positive spike count to make sure that there have not been too many positive spikes; checking to see if the "above bias delay" detector has set a delay; defining a preset deployment threshold value for use in determining activation of the impact responsive device; comparing S(t) to the preset deployment threshold value; and deciding whether to activate or to continue processing the next acceleration sample.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US5068793A
Cited
US5606501A
Cited
US5495414A
Cited
US5498028A
Cited
US5394328A
Cited
US5587906A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2002-09-06 | 2003-03-08 | 2003-09-07 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2006-09-06 | 2007-03-08 | 2007-09-07 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2010-09-06 | 2011-03-08 | 2011-09-07 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |