← Back to Patent Explorer
US6002981A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Correction method and intelligent vehicle guidance system for a composite-navigation of a motor vehicle

Assignee: Robert Bosch GmbH
•
Filing: 1995-04-19
•
Granted: 1999-12-14
•
Expires: 2015-04-19
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A correction method is provided for a map-supported navigation system or for a navigation system, in which the position of a motor vehicle found by means of composite navigation is checked and corrected. To correct the fed back position, a range of error is initially established, whose magnitude is determined by the tolerances of the vehicle sensors of the measuring errors of a navigation system. Within this range of error, all paved roads are taken into consideration as a possible vehicle position. A main route on which the vehicle is travelling is selected for the most probable position of the motor vehicle. The other positions continue to be used as parallel routes. If plausibility considerations reveal that a parallel route has a greater probability for the vehicle position than the present main route, then the parallel route is defined as the new main route. With the aid of a hysteresis, the current (actual) vehicle position is prevented from continually jumping back and forth among several streets.

Inventors

  • 👤 Peter Kreft

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-01 15:34
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01C; G01C21/00; G01C21/26; G01C21/28; G01C21/30

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 31
Claim 1
Independent Claim 138 words
A method for correcting a map-supported navigation system, comprising the steps of: determining on a map stored in a map memory an estimated position of a vehicle using a composite navigation arrangement; determining a first error range for the estimated position; determining roads on the map that are substantially parallel to a vehicle direction; determining a possible position of the vehicle on each road of the roads, each possible position being within the first error range; determining concurrently a second error range for each possible position, the second error range being variable; selecting a designated road from a set including the roads, the designated road being selected by determining a likelihood that the designated road represents an actual road on which the vehicle is traveling; and selecting the possible position on the selected road as a designated position.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 138 words
A method for correcting a map-supported navigation system, comprising the steps of: determining on a map stored in a map memory an estimated position of a vehicle using a composite navigation arrangement; determining a first error range for the estimated position; determining roads on the map that are substantially parallel to a vehicle direction; determining a possible position of the vehicle on each road of the roads, each possible position being within the first error range; determining concurrently a second error range for each possible position, the second error range being variable; selecting a designated road from a set including the roads, the designated road being selected by determining a likelihood that the designated road represents an actual road on which the vehicle is traveling; and selecting the possible position on the selected road as a designated position.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of: receiving a navigation signal from at least one of a vehicle sensor and a navigation device.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method according to claim 2, further comprising the step of: forming a driving area as a function of the navigation signal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 46 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the first error range and the second error range include at least one of a one-dimensional area and a two-dimensional area for at least one of a linear error range, a transverse error range and a directional error range.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 35 words
The method according to claim 4, further comprising the step of: correcting the linear error range of the composite navigation arrangement as a function of a difference between the estimated position and the designated position.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of: extracting the map from the map memory.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 28 words
The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of: after selecting the designated position, evaluating each possible position, while plausible, as a potential subsequently designated position.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of: after selecting the designated road, evaluating each road, while plausible, of the roads as a potential subsequently designated road.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method according to claim 8, further comprising the step of: determining substantially parallel roads, where present, for each one of tho potential subsequently designated roads.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the designated position is output on a road map display.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of: extending along one of the roads, the extended road maintaining initially information about the roads.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 54 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of selecting the designated road includes the step of comparing a first set of parameters of each of the roads with a second set of parameters including parameters ascertained from a navigational signal from at least one of a vehicle sensor and a navigation device.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 72 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of selecting the designated road includes the step of comparing a first set of parameters of each of the roads with a second set of parameters including at least one of an angle of inclination of the vehicle, actual slope of a road on which the vehicle travels and a length of time interval in which one of the roads has been plausible.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 36 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of selecting the designated road includes the step of using a hysteresis characteristic through which a change in a status of a previous designated road is delayed.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 33 words
The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of: calculating a difference between the estimated position and the designated position subsequent to the vehicle rounding a curve of the designated road.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of: repositioning the estimated position of the vehicle using the data from a navigation-satellite receiver.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method according to claim 16, wherein a particular road of the roads is not plausible if the particular road is entirely outside an error range of the navigation-satellite receiver.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of: using a guidance system, wherein, when an ambiguity occurs in selecting the designated road, conformity with a target route as determined by the guidance system is considered.
Claim 20
Independent Claim 220 words
A method for correcting a map-supported navigation system, comprising the steps of: determining on a map stored in a map memory an estimated position of a vehicle using a composite navigation arrangement; determining a first error range for the estimated position; determining roads on the map that are substantially parallel to a vehicle direction; determining a possible position of the vehicle on each road of the roads, each possible position being within the first error range; determining concurrently a second error range for each possible position, the second error range being variable; selecting a designated road from a set including the roads, the designated road being selected by determining a likelihood that the designated road represents an actual road on which the vehicle is traveling; and selecting the possible position on the selected road as a designated position, wherein the second error range is predetermined for each possible position, the second error range having a magnitude determined by at least one of a measuring tolerance of a vehicle sensor and a measuring tolerance of a navigation device, the second error range including one of a one-dimensional area and a two dimensional area, at least one of the one-dimensional area and the two-dimensional area being provided for at least one of a linear error, a transverse error and a directional error.
Claim 21
Independent Claim 220 words
A method for correcting a map-supported navigation system, comprising the steps of: determining on a map stored in a map memory an estimated position of a vehicle using a composite navigation arrangement; determining a first error range for the estimated position; determining roads on the map that are substantially parallel to a vehicle direction; determining a possible position of the vehicle on each road of the roads, each possible position being within the first error range; determining concurrently a second error range for each possible position, the second error range being variable; selecting a designated road from a set including the roads, the designated road being selected by determining a likelihood that the designated road represents an actual road on which the vehicle is traveling; and selecting the possible position on the selected road as a designated position, wherein the second error range is predetermined for each possible position, the second error range having a magnitude determined by at least one of a measuring tolerance of a vehicle sensor and a measuring tolerance of a navigation device, the second error range including one of a one-dimensional area and a two dimensional area, at least one of the one-dimensional area and the two-dimensional area being provided for at least one of a linear error, a transverse error and a directional error.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 37 words
The method according to claim 19, wherein the second error range is a same size for all of the roads, the second error range being prescribed by tolerances of the sensor and tolerances of the navigation device.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method according to claim 19, wherein the second error range is calculated for each of the roads.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method according to claim 19, wherein each of the roads is associated with a respective error range, a size of the respective error range being determined by respective prescribed tolerances of the sensor.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 242 words
A map-supported navigation system, comprising: a processing unit including a selector device and at least one computer for calculating parameters for roads that are substantially parallel to a vehicle direction; sensors coupled to the processing unit and providing navigational signals, the sensors ascertaining at least one of a vehicle direction and a distance traveled by the vehicle; a map memory coupled to the processing unit, the map memory providing data with respect to the roads; an input unit coupled to the processing unit; and an output unit coupled between the processing unit and the map memory, the output unit outputting a designated position of the vehicle, wherein the selector device accesses data with respect to the roads including data concerning an error range associated with each possible position on each of the roads, the selector device selecting a designated road by determining a likelihood that the designated road represents a road on which the vehicle is actually traveling, the error range including at least one of a one-dimensional area and a two-dimensional area for at least one of a linear error range, a transverse error range and a directional error range, the error range being determined concurrently for each possible position and being variable, and wherein the processing unit corrects the linear error range of a composite navigation arrangement as a function of a difference between an estimated position and the designated position, the estimated position determined using the composite navigation arrangement.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 242 words
A map-supported navigation system, comprising: a processing unit including a selector device and at least one computer for calculating parameters for roads that are substantially parallel to a vehicle direction; sensors coupled to the processing unit and providing navigational signals, the sensors ascertaining at least one of a vehicle direction and a distance traveled by the vehicle; a map memory coupled to the processing unit, the map memory providing data with respect to the roads; an input unit coupled to the processing unit; and an output unit coupled between the processing unit and the map memory, the output unit outputting a designated position of the vehicle, wherein the selector device accesses data with respect to the roads including data concerning an error range associated with each possible position on each of the roads, the selector device selecting a designated road by determining a likelihood that the designated road represents a road on which the vehicle is actually traveling, the error range including at least one of a one-dimensional area and a two-dimensional area for at least one of a linear error range, a transverse error range and a directional error range, the error range being determined concurrently for each possible position and being variable, and wherein the processing unit corrects the linear error range of a composite navigation arrangement as a function of a difference between an estimated position and the designated position, the estimated position determined using the composite navigation arrangement.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 36 words
The map-supported navigation system according to claim 23, further comprising: a guidance unit coupled to the processing unit, to the output unit end to the input unit, the guidance unit assisting in selecting the designated road.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 19 words
The map-supported navigation system according to claim 23, wherein the designated position is visually displayed on the output unit.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 20 words
The map-supported navigation system according to claim 23, wherein the output unit displays the designated position on the designated road.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 40 words
The map-supported navigation system according to claim 23, further comprising: a guidance unit coupled to the processing unit and to the input unit, the guidance unit generating a guidance starting position after entering a target destination via an input unit.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 33 words
The map-supported navigation system according to claim 23, further comprising: a navigation-satellite receiver coupled to the processing unit, the navigation-satellite receiver using the received data to reposition the estimated position of the vehicle.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2002-12-13 2003-06-14 2003-12-14 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2006-12-13 2007-06-14 2007-12-14 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2010-12-13 2011-06-14 2011-12-14 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag