User interface system and method for browsing a hypertext database

Claim 3

The method of claim 1, wherein step (C) further includes the step of receiving a weighted relevancy ranking that is combined with a historical weighted relevancy ranking, and in which step (E) further includes the step of for the purpose of comparing the set of relevant index term values with sets of the descriptive index terms using the weighted relevancy ranking, the set of relevant index term values, and the historical weighted relevancy ranking.

Claim 4

The method recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of receiving a historical weighted average relevancy rank value for each of the descriptive index terms, and in which step (C) comprises the step of setting a weighted relevancy ranking of each descriptive index term equal to the historical weighted average relevancy rank value for that descriptive index term.

Claim 5

The method recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of linking the ranked list of electronic documents to an intermediate tree, in which the intermediate tree is linked to the user's position within the hypertext database.

Claim 6

The method recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of linking each electronic document in the hypertext database to a present position of the user in the hypertext database by an intermediate, dynamically generated tree link.

Claim 7

The method recited in claim 5, further comprising the step of generating each intermediate, dynamically generated tree link in accordance with relevance to the user of the document to which the tree link is linked and in accordance with efficiency of each index term to differentiate between relevant documents.

Claim 8

The method recited in claim 5, further including the step of computing relevance to the user of the document to which the tree link as a function of the set of index terms and the weighted relevancy ranking of the index terms.

Claim 9

The method recited in claim 5, further including the step of computing efficiency of each index term from the distribution of the index term in the documents.

Claim 10

The method of claim 5, wherein the step of indexing the hypertext database includes the step of assigning a efficiency value to each index term, in which the efficiency value is a numerical indication of how well each descriptive index term differentiates the tree links.

Claim 11

The method of claim 9, in which step (F) further includes the step of ranking the documents based on a weighted combination of the user relevancy ranking of each descriptive index term and the efficiency value of each descriptive index term.

Claim 12

The method as recited in claim 5, further including the step of receiving from the user a limit value that identifies a maximum breadth of a tree of the tree links and thereby limits browsing complexity.

Claim 13

The method of claim 11, further including the step of applying a hashing formula that uses the index terms, to minimize a depth of the tree based upon the limit value, and to thereby balance the tree.

Claim 14

A computer-readable medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions for a user of a computer system to traverse a hypertext database to retrieve an electronic document stored in the hypertext database, wherein execution of the one or more sequences of instructions by one or more processors causes the one or more processors to perform the steps of: (A) storing in the hypertext database a plurality of hypertext nodes, each of the hypertext nodes corresponding to an electronic document, wherein each of the hypertext nodes may be selectively linked to another of said hypertext nodes; (B) storing an index in association with the hypertext database, the index comprising a plurality of descriptive index terms, in which each of the descriptive index terms is assigned to one of the electronic documents; (C) receiving a weighted relevancy ranking of each descriptive index term; (D) receiving a set of relevant index term values; (E) comparing the set of relevant index term values with sets of the descriptive index terms using the weighted relevancy ranking and the set of relevant index term values; (F) producing a list of electronic documents based on the comparing step (E), in which the list is ranked in accordance with the relevancy of each document with respect to the user based on the weighted relevancy ranking and in which each document in the list contains at least one of the relevant index term values.

Claim 15

A computer-readable medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions for a user of a computer system to traverse a hypertext database to retrieve an electronic document stored in the hypertext database, wherein execution of the one or more sequences of instructions by one or more processors causes the one or more processors to perform the steps of: (A) storing in the hypertext database a plurality of hypertext nodes, each of the hypertext nodes corresponding to an electronic document, wherein each of the hypertext nodes may be selectively linked to another of said hypertext nodes; (B) storing an index in association with the hypertext database, the index comprising a plurality of descriptive index terms, in which each of the descriptive index terms is assigned to one of the electronic documents; (C) receiving a weighted relevancy ranking of each descriptive index term; (D) receiving a set of relevant index term values; (E) comparing the set of relevant index term values with sets of the descriptive index terms using the weighted relevancy ranking and the set of relevant index term values; (F) producing a list of electronic documents based on the comparing step (E), in which the list is ranked in accordance with the relevancy of each document with respect to the user based on the weighted relevancy ranking and in which each document in the list contains at least one of the relevant index term values.

Claim 16

The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein step (C) further includes the step of receiving a weighted relevancy ranking that is combined with a historical weighted relevancy ranking, and in which step (E) further includes the step of for the purpose of comparing the set of relevant index term values with sets of the descriptive index terms using the weighted relevancy ranking, the set of relevant index term values, and the historical weighted relevancy ranking.

Claim 17

The computer-readable medium recited in claim 13, further comprising the step of receiving a historical weighted average relevancy rank value for each of the descriptive index terms, and in which step (C) comprises the step of setting a weighted relevancy ranking of each descriptive index term equal to the historical weighted average relevancy rank value for that descriptive index term.

Claim 18

The computer-readable medium recited in claim 13, further comprising the step of linking the ranked list of electronic documents to an intermediate tree, in which the intermediate tree is linked to the user's position within the hypertext database.

Claim 19

The computer-readable medium recited in claim 13, further comprising the step of linking each electronic document in the hypertext database to a present position of the user in the hypertext database by an intermediate, dynamically generated tree link.

Claim 20

The computer-readable medium recited in claim 17, further comprising the step of generating each intermediate, dynamically generated tree link in accordance with relevance to the user of the document to which the tree link is linked and in accordance with efficiency of each index term to differentiate between relevant documents.

Claim 21

The method recited in claim 17, further including the step of computing relevance to the user of the document to which the tree link as a function of the set of index terms and the weighted relevancy ranking of the index terms.

Claim 22

The method recited in claim 17, further including the step of computing efficiency of each index term from the distribution of the index term in the documents.