Patent US2718435A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US3420998A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US6164975A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Interactive instructional system using adaptive cognitive profiling
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1998-12-11
•
Granted: 2000-12-26
•
Expires: 2018-12-11
Abstract
Abstract An interactive instructional system realizing an eventstream based educational methodology and enabling an interactive, adaptive learning environment. Continuously tracking and evaluating learner interaction, the system creates and updates a profile of the learner's cognitive style and achievement level. Using this cognitive profile, the system adapts its presentations to the learner's cognitive style and demonstrated ability. Presentations take the form of eventstreams, which are branching sequences of multimedia objects called events. Some of the events contain substantially similar content presented in differing ways so that, using the learner's cognitive profile, the system can select the event that results in the greatest comprehension of the presented material. This selection is accomplished using a utility function that is based on the cognitive profile and that provides a measure of the teaching utility of each of the different cognitive styles. The system can adapt to the learner by updating the utility function through the use of preference relations which are determined through testing and that indicate that of the cognitive styles results in the greatest comprehension by the learner of the content contained within the presentations. The system includes an eventstream development environment which allows the content developer to use accessible libraries of events to create new eventstreams. The eventstreams are structured to follow the paradigm of observed history so that each topic can be presented in the historical context in which it developed.
Inventors
- 👤 Marshall Weingarden
- 👤 Edward Ronald Griffor
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-28 12:32
CPC Classifications
G; G09; G09B; G09B7/00; G09B7/02; G09B7/04
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 24
Claim 1
Independent Claim
285 words
A method of computerer-based learning, comprising the steps of: providing a plurality of related event objects, each of which includes different content that is topically related to the content of the other of said event objects, and each of which has one or more attributes including at least an audio, textual, or visual component that can be presented via a computer workstation; providing a number of additional event objects, each of which includes content that is substantially the same as the content of a corresponding one of the related event objects, and each of which provides a presentation of content that is different than the presentation provided by the corresponding related event object; wherein each of said event objects has an associated cognitive index that includes data representing the attributes utilized in the presentation provided by the event object; generating a cognitive profile for a learner using a plurality of parameters, at least some of which are each associated with one or more of the attributes and are each indicative of a cognitive utility of its associated attributes(s) for the learner; creating an eventsream having the structure of a branching sequence of nodes, each of the nodes representing one of the related event objects and any of the additional event objects corresponding to that related event object; and presenting a number of the event objects to the learner starting with an event object located at a first one of the nodes, and, for any node having two or more event objects, selecting at least one of the event objects for presentation to the learner from among all of the event objects at the node using the learner's cognitive profile and the event objects' cognitive indices.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
285 words
A method of computerer-based learning, comprising the steps of: providing a plurality of related event objects, each of which includes different content that is topically related to the content of the other of said event objects, and each of which has one or more attributes including at least an audio, textual, or visual component that can be presented via a computer workstation; providing a number of additional event objects, each of which includes content that is substantially the same as the content of a corresponding one of the related event objects, and each of which provides a presentation of content that is different than the presentation provided by the corresponding related event object; wherein each of said event objects has an associated cognitive index that includes data representing the attributes utilized in the presentation provided by the event object; generating a cognitive profile for a learner using a plurality of parameters, at least some of which are each associated with one or more of the attributes and are each indicative of a cognitive utility of its associated attributes(s) for the learner; creating an eventsream having the structure of a branching sequence of nodes, each of the nodes representing one of the related event objects and any of the additional event objects corresponding to that related event object; and presenting a number of the event objects to the learner starting with an event object located at a first one of the nodes, and, for any node having two or more event objects, selecting at least one of the event objects for presentation to the learner from among all of the event objects at the node using the learner's cognitive profile and the event objects' cognitive indices.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said step of creating the eventstream comprises creating a script that identifies the event objects within the eventstream and that defines the branching sequence of event objects.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 1, wherein different event objects having substantially the same content have differing emphases on the audio, textual, and visual components used in their presentations.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
70 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the data used in the cognitive index of each event object comprises quantitative data that provides a weighted measure of the attributes of the event object and wherein at least some of the parameters of the cognitive profile that are associated with one or more of the attributes comprise numeric values indicative of the degree of cognitive utility of its associated attribute(s) for learner.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
185 words
A method of computer-based learning, comprising the steps of: providing a plurality of computer-based presentations, wherein some presentations provide different topically-related educational content and other presentations utilize different cognitive styles to present substantially similar content, and wherein the other presentations that utilize different cognitive styles each has a cognitive index associated therewith that includes quantitative data representative of attributes utilized in the presentation with the quantitative data each indicating the extent to which its associated attribute is present in the presentation; providing a cognitive profile for a learner, with the cognitive profile comprising a set of parameters, each of which can be associated with at least one of the attributes and has a numeric value indicative of the cognitive utility of its associated attribute(s) for the learner; selecting at least one of the other presentations using a mathematical function that, using the leaner's cognitive profile and at least some of the other presentations' cognitive indices, determines which of those other presentations best matches the cognitive style of the learner; and providing the learner with an ordered sequence of the presentations that includes the selected presentations.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
185 words
A method of computer-based learning, comprising the steps of: providing a plurality of computer-based presentations, wherein some presentations provide different topically-related educational content and other presentations utilize different cognitive styles to present substantially similar content, and wherein the other presentations that utilize different cognitive styles each has a cognitive index associated therewith that includes quantitative data representative of attributes utilized in the presentation with the quantitative data each indicating the extent to which its associated attribute is present in the presentation; providing a cognitive profile for a learner, with the cognitive profile comprising a set of parameters, each of which can be associated with at least one of the attributes and has a numeric value indicative of the cognitive utility of its associated attribute(s) for the learner; selecting at least one of the other presentations using a mathematical function that, using the leaner's cognitive profile and at least some of the other presentations' cognitive indices, determines which of those other presentations best matches the cognitive style of the learner; and providing the learner with an ordered sequence of the presentations that includes the selected presentations.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
110 words
The method of claim 5, further comprising the steps of: providing a utility function that utilizes the learner's cognitive profile and that provides a measure of the teaching utility of each of the cognitive styles; testing the learner to determine which of the cognitive styles results in the greatest comprehension by the learner of content contained within a presentation; determining one or more preference relations between cognitive styles based upon the testing; and updating the utility function based upon the determined preference relations; and wherein said selecting step further comprises selecting presentations to be presented to the learner using the utility function and the cognitive index associated with the presentations.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 6, wherein the utility function represents the mathematical function used in selecting presentations and wherein said step of selecting at least one of the other presentations further comprises selecting the one of those presentations whose cognitive index maximizes the utility function.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 6, further comprising the step of iteratively repeating said testing, determining, updating, and selecting steps to thereby adapt the presentation of content and increase the comprehension of the learner.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
72 words
The method of claim 5, wherein the step of providing a cognitive profile further comprises testing the learner using presentations having different cognitive styles and determining the cognitive profile using the cognitive index associated with the cognitive style that resulted in the greatest comprehension by the learner of the content presented during testing, and wherein the method further comprises the step of aggregating information about a large number of learners' cognitive profiles.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 9, further comprising the step of developing new presentations having a cognitive style that is selected based upon the aggregate information.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
192 words
A method of presenting information to a user on a computer workstation, comprising the steps of: providing a plurality of computer-displayable presentations, some of which provide different topically-related content and others of which utilize different cognitive styles to present substantially similar content, and wherein the other presentations that utilize different cognitive styles each has a cognitive index associated therewith that includes quantitative data representative of attributes utilized in the presentation with the quantitative data each indicating the extent to which its associated attribute is present in the presentation; providing a cognitive profile for the user, with the cognitive profile comprising a set of parameters, each of which can be associated with at least one of the attributes and has a numeric value indicative of the cognitive utility of its associated attribute(s) for the learner; selecting at least one of the other presentations using a mathematical function that, using the user's cognitive profile and at least some of the other presentations' cognitive indices, determines which of those other presentations best matches the cognitive style of the user; and providing the user with an ordered sequence of the presentations that includes the selected presentations.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
192 words
A method of presenting information to a user on a computer workstation, comprising the steps of: providing a plurality of computer-displayable presentations, some of which provide different topically-related content and others of which utilize different cognitive styles to present substantially similar content, and wherein the other presentations that utilize different cognitive styles each has a cognitive index associated therewith that includes quantitative data representative of attributes utilized in the presentation with the quantitative data each indicating the extent to which its associated attribute is present in the presentation; providing a cognitive profile for the user, with the cognitive profile comprising a set of parameters, each of which can be associated with at least one of the attributes and has a numeric value indicative of the cognitive utility of its associated attribute(s) for the learner; selecting at least one of the other presentations using a mathematical function that, using the user's cognitive profile and at least some of the other presentations' cognitive indices, determines which of those other presentations best matches the cognitive style of the user; and providing the user with an ordered sequence of the presentations that includes the selected presentations.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 11, wherein said computer-displayable presentations comprise web pages and wherein said providing step further comprises providing the web pages over a global computer network for display on the computer workstation.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 12, wherein said assigning step further comprises storing information on the user's computer workstation that identifies the cognitive profile associated with the user.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 13, wherein said storing step further comprises storing a cookie on the user's computer workstation, with said cookie providing information that identifies the cognitive profile associated with the user.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
154 words
A method of generating a cognitive profile for a learner for use in selecting among different presentations of educational content delivered by a computer-based learning system, wherein the different presentations each have quantitative data representing the extent to which different attributes are present in the presentation, the method comprising the steps of: (a) providing an initial set of coefficients that together form at least a portion of the cognitive profile, wherein the coefficients comprise numeric values each of which is associated with at least one of the attributes; (b) providing feedback through iterations of the following steps (b1)-(b3): (b1) presenting educational content to the learner using different presentations having varying emphasis on different ones of the attributes; (b2) determining which of the presentations given to the learner results in the greatest comprehension of the educational content presented; and (b3) updating the coefficients using the quantitative data associated with the presentation identified in step (b2).
Claim 19
Independent Claim
154 words
A method of generating a cognitive profile for a learner for use in selecting among different presentations of educational content delivered by a computer-based learning system, wherein the different presentations each have quantitative data representing the extent to which different attributes are present in the presentation, the method comprising the steps of: (a) providing an initial set of coefficients that together form at least a portion of the cognitive profile, wherein the coefficients comprise numeric values each of which is associated with at least one of the attributes; (b) providing feedback through iterations of the following steps (b1)-(b3): (b1) presenting educational content to the learner using different presentations having varying emphasis on different ones of the attributes; (b2) determining which of the presentations given to the learner results in the greatest comprehension of the educational content presented; and (b3) updating the coefficients using the quantitative data associated with the presentation identified in step (b2).
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 15, further comprising the step of generating a utility function using the cognitive profile and wherein step (b3) further comprises updating the coefficients using both the utility function and an approximation of the utility function.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 16, wherein step (b2) further comprises determining one or more preference relations and thereafter determining the approximation of the utility function using the preference relation(s).
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 15, wherein said numeric values comprise scaled settings of the cognitive profile and wherein step (a) further comprises providing at least one toggle setting that forms a portion of the cognitive profile, with said toggle setting representing at least one unweighted attribute of the learner's cognitive style.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 15, wherein step (a) further comprises providing learner-identifying data that forms a portion of the cognitive profile.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 15, wherein step (b) further comprises using the learning system to perform steps (b1)-(b3) on a continuous basis.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US5011414A
Cited
US4820167A
Cited
US5002491A
Cited
US5241671A
Cited
US5241671C1
Cited
US5176520A
Cited
US5261823A
Cited
US5316485A
Cited
US5267865A
Cited
US5441415A
Cited
US5810605A
Cited
US5813863A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2003-12-26 | 2004-06-26 | 2004-12-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2007-12-26 | 2008-06-26 | 2008-12-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2011-12-26 | 2012-06-26 | 2012-12-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |