US6282579B1
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for supporting address interaction between a first entity and a second entity, converter for address interaction, and computer system
Assignee: Alcatel Lucent SAS
•
Filing: 1997-08-20
•
Granted: 2001-08-28
•
Expires: 2017-08-20
Abstract
Abstract To support address interaction between a first entity and a second entity which use different addressing modes with address types in different specification languages and with address values of different semantics, an address type with an address value according to the first addressing mode is converted to a correspondent type of the other specification language. The correspondent type is so constructed that it contains both the address value according to the addressing mode of the first entity and the address value according to the addressing mode of the second entity.
Inventors
- 👤 Laurent Carre
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 14:56
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F9/00; G06F9/06; G06F9/46; G06F9/54; G06F9/541; G06F9/465
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
162 words
A method for supporting address interaction between a first entity and a second entity which use different addressing modes with address types in different specification languages and with address values of different semantics, said method comprising the steps of receiving an address type with an address value according to an addressing mode of the first entity and of converting said address type to a correspondent type of a specification language of the second entity, characterized in that the correspondent type is so constructed that it contains both a first address value according to the addressing mode of the first entity and a second address value according to an addressing mode of the second entity so that the first address value and the second address value are transported from the first entity to the second entity and are available both during the transport and at the second entity in order to reduce semantic conversion and message exchanges by and with a central service.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
162 words
A method for supporting address interaction between a first entity and a second entity which use different addressing modes with address types in different specification languages and with address values of different semantics, said method comprising the steps of receiving an address type with an address value according to an addressing mode of the first entity and of converting said address type to a correspondent type of a specification language of the second entity, characterized in that the correspondent type is so constructed that it contains both a first address value according to the addressing mode of the first entity and a second address value according to an addressing mode of the second entity so that the first address value and the second address value are transported from the first entity to the second entity and are available both during the transport and at the second entity in order to reduce semantic conversion and message exchanges by and with a central service.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the address value according to the second addressing mode is determined from the address value according to the first addressing mode and is entered in the correspondent type.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
23 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that for the interaction, the correspondent type is transferred to the second entity.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the addressing mode of one of the entities uses ASN.1 as the specification language for specifying the address type.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the addressing mode of one of the entities uses CORBA IDL as the specification language for specifying the address type.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
158 words
A converter for address interaction between a first entity and a second entity using different addressing modes with address types in different specification languages and with address values of different semantics, said converter for converting an address type with an address value according to a first addressing mode to a correspondent type of another specification language, characterized in that the converter is for constructing the correspondent type with means for containing a first address value according to the first addressing mode of the first entity and with means for containing a second address value according to an addressing mode of the second entity so that both the first address value and the second address value are transported from the first entity to the second entity and are available both during the transport and at the second entity in order to avoid semantic conversion by a central service with a resultant reduction in messages exchanged with said central service.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
158 words
A converter for address interaction between a first entity and a second entity using different addressing modes with address types in different specification languages and with address values of different semantics, said converter for converting an address type with an address value according to a first addressing mode to a correspondent type of another specification language, characterized in that the converter is for constructing the correspondent type with means for containing a first address value according to the first addressing mode of the first entity and with means for containing a second address value according to an addressing mode of the second entity so that both the first address value and the second address value are transported from the first entity to the second entity and are available both during the transport and at the second entity in order to avoid semantic conversion by a central service with a resultant reduction in messages exchanged with said central service.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
166 words
A computer system comprising at least one first entity and at least one second entity for using different addressing modes with address types in different specification languages and with address values of different semantics, and further comprising at least one converter for converting an address type with an address value according to the first addressing mode to a correspondent type of the other specification language, characterized in that the converter is for constructing the correspondent type in such a way that it contains both a first address value according to the addressing mode of the first entity and a second address value according to an addressing mode of the second entity so that both the first address value and the second address value are transported from the first entity to the second entity and are available both during the transport and at the second entity in order to avoid semantic conversion by a central service with a resultant reduction in messages exchanged with said central service.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
166 words
A computer system comprising at least one first entity and at least one second entity for using different addressing modes with address types in different specification languages and with address values of different semantics, and further comprising at least one converter for converting an address type with an address value according to the first addressing mode to a correspondent type of the other specification language, characterized in that the converter is for constructing the correspondent type in such a way that it contains both a first address value according to the addressing mode of the first entity and a second address value according to an addressing mode of the second entity so that both the first address value and the second address value are transported from the first entity to the second entity and are available both during the transport and at the second entity in order to avoid semantic conversion by a central service with a resultant reduction in messages exchanged with said central service.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
31 words
A computer system as claimed in claim 7 , characterized in that the at least one first entity and the at least one second entity are for interacting with each other.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
34 words
A computer system as claimed in claim 7 , characterized in that said system includes at least two first entities that use transport mechanisms of the second entity and interact via said transport mechanisms.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
21 words
A computer system as claimed in claim 7 , characterized in that the first entity is an open systems interconnection entity.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
23 words
A computer system as claimed in claim 7 , characterized in that the second entity is a common object request broker architecture entity.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
21 words
A computer system as claimed in claim 11 , characterized in that the first entity is an open systems interconnection entity.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US5261077A
Cited
US5283878A
Cited
US5432925A
Cited
US5726979A
Cited
US5983233A
Cited
US6052526A
Cited
US5923879A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2004-08-27 | 2005-02-26 | 2005-08-28 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2008-08-27 | 2009-02-26 | 2009-08-28 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2012-08-27 | 2013-02-26 | 2013-08-28 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |