US4713347A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Measurement of ligand/anti-ligand interactions using bulk conductance
Assignee: Sensor Diagnostics Inc
•
Filing: 1985-01-14
•
Granted: 1987-12-15
•
Expires: 2005-01-14
Abstract
Abstract Methods, apparatus and sensors are described for detection of specific ligands in a fluid sample by measuring ligand-specific changes in the bulk electrical conductance (or resistance) of a fixed test volume, with antiligand or ligand localized in or near that volume.
Inventors
- 👤 David H. Mitchell
- 👤 Ralph M. Mitchell
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 02:05
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N33/00; G01N33/48; G01N33/50; G01N33/53; G01N33/5302; G01N33/543; G01N33/54366; G01N33/54373; G01N33/5438; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S436/00; Y10S436/806; Y10S436/807
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 90
Claim 1
Independent Claim
89 words
A method for determining the presence of a ligand in a fluid sample comprising: (a) localizing antiligand which interacts with said ligand in at least one predetermined region, said predetermined region being at least partially contained within a test volume; (b) exposing said predetermined region to said fluid sample; and (c) measuring the bulk conductance of said test volume to determine the occurrence of ligand-antiligand interaction in said predetermined region by detecting changes in the bulk conductance of said test volume due to ligand-antiligand interaction in said predetermined region.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
89 words
A method for determining the presence of a ligand in a fluid sample comprising: (a) localizing antiligand which interacts with said ligand in at least one predetermined region, said predetermined region being at least partially contained within a test volume; (b) exposing said predetermined region to said fluid sample; and (c) measuring the bulk conductance of said test volume to determine the occurrence of ligand-antiligand interaction in said predetermined region by detecting changes in the bulk conductance of said test volume due to ligand-antiligand interaction in said predetermined region.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said localization of said antiligand in said predetermined region comprises confining said antiligand within the boundaries of a membrane, said membrane being permeable at least to said ligand.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said ligand is selected from the group consisting of antigens, cell surface antigens, antigenic determinants, haptens, antibodies, antibody fragments, monovalent antibody fragments, nucleic acid sequences, enzymes, cofactors, enzyme substrates, genetically or chemically altered proteins, receptor protein, permeases, other transport proteins, binding proteins, molecules bound by a permease, transport protein or binding protein, carbohydrates, lectins, metal ions, metal-binding proteins, and other metal-binding substances.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said antiligand has high affinity for said ligand.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said antiligand has low affinity for said ligand.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1, including the step of forming a complex between an antiligand specific for said ligand to be determined and an amplifying substance.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 6, wherein said complex is preformed and said ligand in said fluid sample binds to said antiligand component of said complex and further binds to said antiligand in said predetermined region.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the bulk conductance of said test volume is measured with electrodes which are in contact with an electrolyte.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method of claim 8, wherein four electrodes are used to measure the bulk conductance of said test volume, two of said electrodes providing a current through said test volume whose bulk conductance is being measured and two of said electrodes measuring the voltage drop across said test volume.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 9, wherein said voltage electrodes are recessed from said current.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 9, wherein said current electrodes are recessed from said test volume.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said localization of said antiligand in said predetermined region comprises immobilizing said antiligand on a matrix.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 12, wherein said matrix is selected from the group consisting of gel beads, gel layers, glass beads, polymeric beads, microporous membranes, porous paper, and mixtures thereof.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 12, wherein said matrix is contacted with a flowing stream of said fluid sample.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 14, wherein said contacting comprises causing said fluid sample to flow through said matrix.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 14, wherein said contacting comprises causing said fluid sample to flow past said matrix.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said changes in bulk conductance are determined by comparing the bulk conductance of said test volume with the bulk conductance of at least one control volume.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 17, wherein said control volume does not contain any localized substance therein.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 17, wherein said fluid sample contains a known concentration of a control ligand, and control antiligand which interacts with said control ligand is localized in at least one predetermined region of said control volume.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 17, wherein said control volume does not contain antiligand which reacts with said ligand.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 20, wherein said control volume is substantially free of specific interactions which effect changes in bulk conductance.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 21, said control volume at least partially containing therein at least one predetermined region, said predetermined region being exposed to said fluid sample and also having localized therein molecules whose physical properties are similar to the physical properties of said antiligand.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
74 words
The method of claim 21, wherein at least one of (a) the bulk conductance of said test volume, and (b) the bulk conductance of a second control volume is further compared with the bulk conductance of said control volume, and wherein said fluid sample contains a known concentration of a control ligand, and control antiligand which interacts with said control ligand is localized in at least one predetermined region of said second control volume.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method claim 1, including the step of forming a complex between a ligand which interacts with said antiligand and an amplifying substance.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 24, wherein said complex is preformed and added to said fluid sample, said ligand component of said complex being present in a known amount.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 24, wherein said complex is preformed and prebound to said antiligand in said predetermined region.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 24, wherein said complex is preformed and compartmentalized in at least one region which is adjacent said predetermined region containing said localized antiligand, said compartment being at least partially within said test volume.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 24, wherein said complex is formed in said fluid sample, said ligand component of said complex being derived from the ligand present in said fluid sample.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 28, including the step of adding a known amount of ligand which interacts with said antiligand to said fluid sample containing said complex therein.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
57 words
The method of claim 24, wherein said amplifying substance is a particle selected from the group consisting of antiligand which interacts with said ligand, antiligand which interacts with said ligand bound to a second amplifying substance, macromolecules, cells, small molecules, molecular complexes, latex beads, lipid vesicles, non-conducting polymer beads, other non-conducting particles, magnetic particles, and mixtures thereof.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 30, wherein said particle is antiligand which interacts with said ligand bound to said second amplifying substance.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 31, wherein said second amplifying substance can be further reacted to effect a change in the bulk conductance of said test volume.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 32, wherein said further reaction comprises generation of a gas.
Claim 35
Independent Claim
90 words
A method for determining the presence of a ligand in a fluid sample comprising: (a) localizing ligand in at least one predetermined region, said predetermined region being at least partially contained within a test volume; (b) exposing said predetermined region to said fluid sample and to an antiligand which interacts both with said ligand in said fluid sample and said localized ligand; and (c) measuring the bulk conductance of said test volume to determine the occurrence of ligand-antiligand interaction by detecting changes in the bulk conductance of said test volume.
Claim 36
Independent Claim
90 words
A method for determining the presence of a ligand in a fluid sample comprising: (a) localizing ligand in at least one predetermined region, said predetermined region being at least partially contained within a test volume; (b) exposing said predetermined region to said fluid sample and to an antiligand which interacts both with said ligand in said fluid sample and said localized ligand; and (c) measuring the bulk conductance of said test volume to determine the occurrence of ligand-antiligand interaction by detecting changes in the bulk conductance of said test volume.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 34, wherein said changes in bulk conductance are determined by comparing the bulk conductance of said test volume with the bulk conductance of at least one control volume.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 34, wherein said localization of said localized ligand comprises confining said ligand within the boudaries of a membrane, said membrane being permeable to at least said antiligand and said ligand present in said fluid sample.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 34, including the step of forming a complex between antiligand which interacts with said ligand and an amplifying substance.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 34, including the step of forming a complex between a ligand which interacts with said antiligand and an amplifying substance.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 34, wherein localization of said localized ligand comprises immobilization on a matrix.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 39, wherein said matrix is contacted with a flowing stream of said fluid sample.
Claim 43
Independent Claim
86 words
A method for determining the presence of a ligand in a fluid sample comprising: (a) localizing antiligand which interacts with said ligand in at least one predetermined region, said predetermined region being separate from a test volume; (b) exposing said predetermined region to said fluid sample; and (c) measuring the bulk conductance of said test volume to determine the occurrence of ligand-antiligand interaction in said predetermined region by detecting changes in the bulk conductance of said test volume due to ligand-antiligand interaction in said predetermined region.
Claim 44
Independent Claim
86 words
A method for determining the presence of a ligand in a fluid sample comprising: (a) localizing antiligand which interacts with said ligand in at least one predetermined region, said predetermined region being separate from a test volume; (b) exposing said predetermined region to said fluid sample; and (c) measuring the bulk conductance of said test volume to determine the occurrence of ligand-antiligand interaction in said predetermined region by detecting changes in the bulk conductance of said test volume due to ligand-antiligand interaction in said predetermined region.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 11, including the step of forming a complex between a ligand which interacts with said antiligand and an amplifying substance.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 42, wherein said complex is preformed and compartmentalized in at least one region which is adjacent said predetermined region containing said localized antiligand, said compartment being at least partially within said test volume.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
113 words
A sensor for determining the presence of a ligand in a fluid sample, said sensor comprising: (a) means for localizing (i) antiligand which interacts with said ligand or (ii) ligand which interacts with an antiligand, which antiligand also interacts with said ligand in said fluid sample, said localizing means selected from the group consisting of (a) a semipermeable membrane which is permeable at least to said ligand or (b) a matrix material selected from the group consisting of gel beads, gel layers, glass beads, polymeric beads, microporous membranes, porous paper, and mixtures thereof; and (b) means for measuring the bulk conductance of a test volume which at least partially includes said localizing means.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
113 words
A sensor for determining the presence of a ligand in a fluid sample, said sensor comprising: (a) means for localizing (i) antiligand which interacts with said ligand or (ii) ligand which interacts with an antiligand, which antiligand also interacts with said ligand in said fluid sample, said localizing means selected from the group consisting of (a) a semipermeable membrane which is permeable at least to said ligand or (b) a matrix material selected from the group consisting of gel beads, gel layers, glass beads, polymeric beads, microporous membranes, porous paper, and mixtures thereof; and (b) means for measuring the bulk conductance of a test volume which at least partially includes said localizing means.
Claim 49
Independent Claim
133 words
An apparatus for determining the presence of a ligand in a fluid sample, said apparatus comprising: (a) in at least one predetermined region of said apparatus, means for localizing (i) antiligand which interacts with said ligand or (ii) ligand which interacts with an antiligand, which antiligand also interacts with said ligand in said fluid sample, said localizing means selected from the group consisting of (a) a semipermeable membrane which is permeable at least to said ligand or (b) a matrix material selected from the group consisting of gel beads, gel layers, glass beads, polymeric beads, microporous membranes, porous paper, and mixtures thereof; (b) means for contacting said fluid sample with said localizing means; and (c) means for measuring the bulk conductance of a test volume which at least partially contains said predetermined region.
Claim 50
Independent Claim
133 words
An apparatus for determining the presence of a ligand in a fluid sample, said apparatus comprising: (a) in at least one predetermined region of said apparatus, means for localizing (i) antiligand which interacts with said ligand or (ii) ligand which interacts with an antiligand, which antiligand also interacts with said ligand in said fluid sample, said localizing means selected from the group consisting of (a) a semipermeable membrane which is permeable at least to said ligand or (b) a matrix material selected from the group consisting of gel beads, gel layers, glass beads, polymeric beads, microporous membranes, porous paper, and mixtures thereof; (b) means for contacting said fluid sample with said localizing means; and (c) means for measuring the bulk conductance of a test volume which at least partially contains said predetermined region.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim
36 words
The apparatus of claim 45, wherein said region comprises at least one test region for determining the presence of said ligand and at least one control region to provide a comparative basis for making said measurement.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim
15 words
The apparatus of claim 45, wherein said test volume essentially entirely includes said localizing means.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim
40 words
The apparatus of claim 45, wherein said contacting means comprise a structure having: (a) an inlet channel for bringing said fluid sample to said localizing means; and (b) an outlet channel for removing said fluid sample from said localizing means.
Claim 54
Dependent Claim
12 words
The apparatus of claim 48, wherein said structure comprises a non-conductive material.
Claim 55
Dependent Claim
23 words
The apparatus of claim 45, wherein said non-conductive material is selected from the group consisting of plastic, ceramic, glass, quartz, and mixtures thereof.
Claim 56
Dependent Claim
69 words
The apparatus of claim 48, wherein said structure comprises at least three component parts, said first component part comprising said inlet channel, said second component part comprising said outlet channel, and said third component part comprising said localizing means, said first and second component parts being fastened in a sandwiched fashion about said third component part, said third component part being insertable between said first and second component parts.
Claim 57
Dependent Claim
24 words
The apparatus of claim 51, further comprising a fluid bath, wherein at least said inlet and outlet channels are submerged in said fluid bath.
Claim 58
Dependent Claim
19 words
The apparatus of claim 45, wherein said means for measuring the bulk conductance comprises a plurality of spaced-apart electrodes.
Claim 59
Dependent Claim
18 words
The apparatus of claim 53, wherein said apparatus additionally includes a current-modulating material adjacent to said localizing means.
Claim 60
Dependent Claim
15 words
The apparatus of claim 53, wherein said localizing means additionally comprises a current modulating material.
Claim 61
Dependent Claim
16 words
The apparatus of claim 53, wherein said plurality of electrodes are in contact with an electrolyte.
Claim 62
Dependent Claim
13 words
The apparatus of claim 56, wherein said plurality of electrodes comprises two electrodes.
Claim 63
Dependent Claim
13 words
The apparatus of claim 57, wherein said plurality of electrodes includes auxiliary electrodes.
Claim 64
Dependent Claim
12 words
The apparatus of claim 58, wherein said auxiliary electrodes comprise guard electrodes.
Claim 65
Dependent Claim
15 words
The apparatus of claim 56, wherein said plurality of electrodes comprises at least four electrodes.
Claim 66
Dependent Claim
28 words
The apparatus of claim 60, wherein two of said electrodes provide a current through said test volume and two measure the drop in voltage across said test volume.
Claim 67
Dependent Claim
14 words
The apparatus of claim 61, wherein said plurality of electrodes also includes auxiliary electrodes.
Claim 68
Dependent Claim
12 words
The apparatus of claim 62, wherein said auxiliary electrodes comprise guard electrodes.
Claim 69
Dependent Claim
26 words
The apparatus of claim 61, wherein each of said current electrodes and each of said voltage electrodes is placed on opposite sides of said localizing means.
Claim 70
Dependent Claim
15 words
The apparatus of claim 64, wherein said localizing means essentially entirely includes said test volume.
Claim 71
Dependent Claim
15 words
The apparatus of claim 61, wherein said current electrodes are recessed from said test volume.
Claim 72
Dependent Claim
28 words
The apparatus of claim 66, wherein said recession comprises placing said current electrodes in chambers, said chambers being in electrical contact with said test volume via conducting channels.
Claim 73
Dependent Claim
19 words
The apparatus of claim 67, wherein said conducting channels additionally contain a matrix which retards bubble formation and convection.
Claim 74
Dependent Claim
22 words
The apparatus of claim 61, wherein said current electrodes and said voltage electrodes are on the same side of said localizing means.
Claim 75
Dependent Claim
18 words
The apparatus of claim 69, wherein said current electrodes and said voltage electrodes lie in the same plane.
Claim 76
Dependent Claim
15 words
The apparatus of claim 70, wherein said voltage electrodes are recessed from said current flow.
Claim 77
Dependent Claim
15 words
The apparatus of claim 70, wherein said current electrodes are recessed from said test volume.
Claim 78
Dependent Claim
18 words
The apparatus of claim 70, wherein said apparatus additionally includes a current-modulating material adjacent to said localizing means.
Claim 79
Dependent Claim
14 words
The apparatus of claim 61, wherein said voltage electrodes are recessed from current flow.
Claim 80
Dependent Claim
28 words
The apparatus of claim 74, wherein said recession comprises placing said voltage electrodes in chambers, said chambers being in electrical contact with said test volume via conducting channels.
Claim 81
Dependent Claim
45 words
The apparatus of claim 75, wherein the width of the opening of said conducting channels adjacent to said test volume ranges from about 25 um to 100 um, and said openings are from about 40 um to 200 um apart with respect to each other.
Claim 82
Dependent Claim
19 words
The apparatus of claim 75, wherein said conducting channels additionally contain a matrix which retards bubble formation and convection.
Claim 83
Dependent Claim
18 words
The apparatus of claim 77, wherein said localizing means also comprises said matrix contained in said conducting channels.
Claim 84
Dependent Claim
42 words
The apparatus of claim 75, wherein the width of the opening of said conducting channels ranges from about 10 um to about 1 mm, and said openings are from about 10 um to about 1 mm apart with respect to each other.
Claim 85
Dependent Claim
15 words
The apparatus of claim 79, wherein said test volume ranges up to about 1 ul.
Claim 86
Dependent Claim
15 words
The apparatus of claim 79, wherein said test volume is less than about 0.1 ul.
Claim 87
Dependent Claim
18 words
The apparatus of claim 79, wherein the thickness of said test volume ranges up to about 1 mm.
Claim 88
Dependent Claim
18 words
The apparatus of claim 79, wherein the thickness of said test volume is less than about 0.1 mm.
Claim 89
Dependent Claim
18 words
The apparatus of claim 79, wherein the volume of said predetermined region is less than about 0.1 ul.
Claim 90
Dependent Claim
18 words
The apparatus of claim 79, wherein the thickness of said predetermined region is less than about 0.1 mm.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3555143A
Cited
US3654090B1
Cited
US3654090A
Cited
US3646346A
Cited
US3850752A
Cited
US3791932A
Cited
US4053646A
Cited
US4054646A
Cited
US3963979A
Cited
US3939408A
Cited
US3975238A
Cited
US4092408A
Cited
US4151049A
Cited
US4081334A
Cited
US4238757A
Cited
US4191739A
Cited
US4242096A
Cited
US4219335A
Cited
US4236893A
Cited
US4233144A
Cited
US4321057A
Cited
US4402819A
Cited
US4350660A
Cited
US4376110A
Cited
US4444892A
Cited
US4334880A
Cited
US4473456A
Cited
US4452773A
Cited
WO1984003945A1
Cited
US4571543A
Cited
US4554257A
Cited
US4562157A
Cited
US4652830A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1990-12-14 | 1991-06-15 | 1991-12-15 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1994-12-14 | 1995-06-15 | 1995-12-15 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1998-12-14 | 1999-06-15 | 1999-12-15 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |