Patent US3493773A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4777510A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4735899A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4735899A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Detection of airborne microorganisms
Assignee: BAKER COMPANY Inc SANFORD AIRPORT PO BOX E STANFORD ME A CORP OF MAINE
•
Filing: 1985-03-11
•
Granted: 1988-04-05
•
Expires: 2005-03-11
Abstract
Abstract Disclosed is a process and test kit for determining the reliability of a barrier to microorganism passage. In accordance with the process, a multiplicity of non-self replicating particles is introduced into a first gas volume, disposed on one side of a barrier to particle movement, and particle traps are placed in a second gas volume on the other side of the barrier. The particles carry a marker substance such as a toxin for a selected microorganism or a component needed for growth of a selected microorganism. The barrier is operated and the contents of the trap are assayed for the amount of the marker substance present in association with particles which crossed the barrier by adding the marker substance in the trap to a culture of the selected microorganism and detecting the effect of the marker substance on the culture. Finally, the results of the assay are compared to a standard to determine the number of trapped particles which crossed the barrier. The process is capable of detecting the presence of less than 10 and as few as a single one of the particles.
Inventors
- 👤 David G. Stuart
- 👤 John M. Eagleson, Jr.
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 13:07
CPC Classifications
C; C12; C12Q; C12Q1/00; C12Q1/02; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S435/00; Y10S435/81
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim
182 words
A process for testing the reliabiity of a barrier for prohibiting the passage of airborne microorganisms from a first gas volume to a second gas volume, the process comprising the steps of: A. introducing into a first gas volume a multiplicity of non-self replicating particles carrying a marker substance, said marker substance being selected from the group consisting of a toxin for a selected microorganism and a component needed for growth of a selected microorganism; B. placing a particle trap in a second gas volume; C. operating the barrier; D. thereafter, assaying for the amount of said marker substance present in association with particles which crossed said barrier, and which are contained in said particle trap; by adding the marker substance associated with the contents of said trap to a culture of said selected microoganism, said culture being capable of detecting the presence of less than 10 of said particles, and detecting the effect of said marker substance on said culture; and E. comparing the results of step D to a standard to determine the number of particles which crossed said barrier.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
182 words
A process for testing the reliabiity of a barrier for prohibiting the passage of airborne microorganisms from a first gas volume to a second gas volume, the process comprising the steps of: A. introducing into a first gas volume a multiplicity of non-self replicating particles carrying a marker substance, said marker substance being selected from the group consisting of a toxin for a selected microorganism and a component needed for growth of a selected microorganism; B. placing a particle trap in a second gas volume; C. operating the barrier; D. thereafter, assaying for the amount of said marker substance present in association with particles which crossed said barrier, and which are contained in said particle trap; by adding the marker substance associated with the contents of said trap to a culture of said selected microoganism, said culture being capable of detecting the presence of less than 10 of said particles, and detecting the effect of said marker substance on said culture; and E. comparing the results of step D to a standard to determine the number of particles which crossed said barrier.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
13 words
The process of claim 1 wherein said barrier comprises a biological containment hood.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
12 words
The process of claim 1 wherein said barrier comprises an air curtain.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
11 words
The process of claim 1 wherein said particles comprise killed microorganisms.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
11 words
The process of claim 1 wherein said particles comprise latex particles.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
52 words
The process of claim 1 wherein said marker substance comprises a toxin for said selected microorganism, and step D comprises the step of adding the toxin associated with the contents of said trap to a culture of said selected microorganism and detecting the extent of the death of cells in said culture.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
54 words
The process of claim 1 wheren said marker substance comprises a component needed for growth of said selected microorganism in a selected medium, and step D comprises the step of adding the component associated with the contents of said trap to a culture of said selected microorganism and detecting the extent of growth therein.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
23 words
The process of claim 7 wherein said component needed for growth is selected from the group consisting of nutrients, enzymes, vitamins, and plasmids.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
25 words
The process of claim 7 wherein said component needed for growth comprises niacin, and said culture of said selected microorganism is a static, niacin-starved culture.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
29 words
The process of claim 9 wherein said standard comprises means for correlating the extent of growth of said niacin-starved culture to the number of particles contained in said trap.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
18 words
The process of claim 1 wherein said culture is capable of detecting a single one of said particles.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
33 words
The process of claim 11 wherein said marker substance is niacin, and said step of adding in step D comprises adding niacin associated with the contents of said trap to a niacin-starved culture.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
48 words
The process of claim 12 wherein said step of adding in step D comprises the step of measuring the pH of said niacin-starved culture and said step of comparing in step E comprises comparing the measured pH to a standard correlating pH to the number of particles trapped.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
13 words
The process of claim 13 wherein said niacin-starved culture is a lactobacillus culture.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
121 words
A test kit for testing the reliability of a barrier for prohibiting the passage of airborne microorganisms from a first gas volume to a second gas volume, said kit comprising: a multiplicity of non-self replicating particles carrying a marker substance, said marker substance being selected from the group consisting of a toxin for a selected microorganism and a component needed for growth of a selected microorganism; means for assaying for said marker substance, said means being capable of detecting the presence of a collection of less than 10 of said particles and comprising a culture of said selected microorganism; means for correlating the results of an assay for said marker substance to the number of said articles associated with said marker.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
121 words
A test kit for testing the reliability of a barrier for prohibiting the passage of airborne microorganisms from a first gas volume to a second gas volume, said kit comprising: a multiplicity of non-self replicating particles carrying a marker substance, said marker substance being selected from the group consisting of a toxin for a selected microorganism and a component needed for growth of a selected microorganism; means for assaying for said marker substance, said means being capable of detecting the presence of a collection of less than 10 of said particles and comprising a culture of said selected microorganism; means for correlating the results of an assay for said marker substance to the number of said articles associated with said marker.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
23 words
The kit of claim 15 wherein said means for assaying is capable of detecting the presence of a single one of said particles.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
20 words
The kit of claim 15 wherein said particles are selected from the group consisting of killed microorganisms and latex particles.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
16 words
The kit of claim 15 wherein said marker substance comprises a toxin for said selected microorganism.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
23 words
The kit of claim 15 wherein said marker substance comprises a component needed for growth of said selected microorganism in a selected medium.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
23 words
The kit of claim 19 wherein said component needed for growth is selected from a group consisting of nutrients, enzymes, vitamins, and plasmids.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
24 words
The kit of claim 19 wherein said component needed for growth is niacin, and said culture of said selected microorganisms comprises a niacin-starved culture.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3127329A
Cited
US110A
Cited
US2672431A
Cited
US3001914A
Cited
US3234045A
Cited
US3232094A
Cited
US3129144A
Cited
US3128239A
Cited
US3902971A
Cited
US3458284A
Cited
US3551295A
Cited
US3522724A
Cited
US3576721A
Cited
US3690837A
Cited
US3751340A
Cited
US3956070A
Cited
US3980524A
Cited
US3960001A
Cited
US4092221A
Cited
US3972226A
Cited
US4014747A
Cited
US4073686A
Cited
US4381664A
Cited
US4402214A
Cited
USH110H
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-04-05 | 1991-10-05 | 1992-04-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-04-05 | 1995-10-05 | 1996-04-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-04-05 | 1999-10-05 | 2000-04-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |