← Back to Patent Explorer
US4987066A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Process for the detection of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in eukaryotic genomes

Assignee: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften eV
•
Filing: 1987-09-25
•
Granted: 1991-01-22
•
Expires: 2007-09-25
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract The invention is directed to a process for the analysis of eukaryotic DNA erein DNA of an individual is isolated, the DNA is subjected to restriction endonuclease digest, the cleaved DNA is separated by gel electrophoresis, the gel is dried and hybridized with a probe, and the pattern of the DNA is evaluated. The process is characterized in that the probe used is an oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple tandem repeats having a periodicity of 2 to 4 bases. The process of the invention may be employed for the in vitro diagnosis of genetic defects such as hereditary diseases or for the determination of the genetic interrelationships.

Inventors

  • 👤 Jorg T. Epplen

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-30 06:21
CPC Classifications
C; C12; C12Q; C12Q1/00; C12Q1/68; C12Q1/6876; C12Q1/6813; C12Q1/6827; C12Q1/683; C12Q2600/00; C12Q2600/156

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 27
Claim 1
Independent Claim 94 words
In a process for the determination of the genetic interrelationships of individuals comprising analysis of eukaryotic DNA wherein DNA of an individual is isolated, the DNA is subjected to restriction endonuclease digests, the cleaved DNA is separated by gel electrophoresis, the gel is dried and hybridized with a probe, and the pattern of the DNA is evaluated and compared to that of other individuals, the improvement which comprises use of a probe which comprises a chemically synthesized oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple tandem repeats having a periodicity of 2 to 4 bases.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 94 words
In a process for the determination of the genetic interrelationships of individuals comprising analysis of eukaryotic DNA wherein DNA of an individual is isolated, the DNA is subjected to restriction endonuclease digests, the cleaved DNA is separated by gel electrophoresis, the gel is dried and hybridized with a probe, and the pattern of the DNA is evaluated and compared to that of other individuals, the improvement which comprises use of a probe which comprises a chemically synthesized oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple tandem repeats having a periodicity of 2 to 4 bases.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 17 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the DNA used is human or animal DNA.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 28 words
The process according to any one of claims 1 and 2, characterized in that the restriction enzyme used is Alu I, Hae III, Hinf I, or Mbo I.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 24 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the probe used is an oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple quadruplet repeats (sqr).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 33 words
The process according to claim 4, characterized in that the simple quadruplet repeats (sqr) recognized by the oligonucleotide probe in the eukaryotic genome are GA A sequences or their complement sequences T TC.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 19 words
The process according to claim 5, characterized in that the oligonucleotide has a length of 16 to 23 nucleotides.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 22 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (GATA) 4 GA or its complement sequence TC(TATC) 4 .
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 14 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that the nucleotide is a 20-mer.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 21 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (GATA) 5 or its complement sequence (TATC) 5 .
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 27 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that t he oligo nucleotide is (GATA) 2 GACA(GATA) 2 or its complement sequence (TATC) 2 TGTC(TATC) 2 .
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 28 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (GATA) 4 , (GACA) 4 , or their complement sequences (TATC) 4 or (TGTC) 4 .
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 21 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (GGAT) 4 or its complement sequence (ATCC) 4 .
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 23 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the probe used is an oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple triplet repeats.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 30 words
The process according to claim 13, characterized in that the simple triplet repeats recognized by the oligonucleotide probe in the eukaryotic genome are TCC sequences or their complement sequences GGA.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 19 words
The process according to claim 14, characterized in that the oligonucleotide has a length of 15 to 24 nucleotides.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 21 words
The process according to claim 15, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (TCC) 5 or its complement sequence (GGA) 5 .
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 23 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the probe used is an oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple doublet repeats.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 30 words
The process according to claim 17, characterized in that the simple duplet repeats recognized by the oligonucleotide probe in the eukaryotic genome are GT sequences or their complement sequences AC.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 19 words
The process according to claim 18, characterized in that the oligonucleotide has a length of 16 to 24 nucleotides.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 21 words
The process according to claim 19, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (GT) 8 or its complement sequence (AC) 8 .
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 21 words
The process according to claim 19, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (CT) 8 or its complement sequence (AG) 8 .
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 54 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the consecutive hybridization and evaluation operation comprises hybridizing the cleaved DNA with the radioactively labeled probe, removing the unhybridized part of the probe, exposing an X-ray film to the hybridized product, removing the hybridized product from the gel and repeating the operation with another probe.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 37 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the hybridization and evaluation operation comprises transferring the cleaved DNA onto a solid support, hybridizing the DNA with the biotinylated probe and developing the hybridized product with strepdavidin.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 261 words
The process according to claim 6, wherein the oligonucleotide has one of the following sequences: ______________________________________ (a) oligonucleotide (GATA).sub.4 GA ATA(GATA).sub.3 GAG TA(GATA).sub.3 GAGA A(GATA).sub.3 GAGAT (GATA).sub.3 GA(GATA) ATA(GATA).sub.2 GA(GATA)G TA(GATA).sub.2 GA(GATA)GA A(GATA).sub.2 GA(GATA)GAT (GATA).sub.2 GA(GATA).sub.2 ATA(GATA)GA(GATA).sub.2 G TA(GATA)GA(GATA).sub.2 GA A(GATA)GA(GATA).sub.2 GAT (GATA)GA(GATA).sub.3 ATAGA(GATA).sub.3 G TAGA(GATA).sub.3 GA AGA(GATA).sub.3 GAT GA(GATA).sub.4 A(GATA).sub.4 G (GATA).sub.4 GA or its complement sequence TC(TATC).sub.4 C(TATC).sub.4 T (TATC).sub.4 TC ATC(TATC).sub.3 TCT TC(TATC).sub.3 TCTA C(TATC).sub.3 TCTAT (TATC).sub.3 TC(TATC) ATC(TATC).sub.2 TC(TATC)T TC(TATC).sub.2 TC(TATC)TA C(TATC).sub.2 TC(TATC)TAT (TATC).sub.2 TC(TATC).sub.2 ATC(TATC)TC(TATC).sub.2 T TC(TATC)TC(TATC).sub.2 TA C(TATC)TC(TATC).sub.2 TAT (TATC)TC(TATC).sub.3 ATCTC(TATC).sub.3 T TCTC(TATC).sub.3 TA CTC(TATC).sub.3 TAT TC(TATC).sub.4 b. oligonucleotide or its complement sequence (GATA).sub.5 (TATC).sub.5 ATA(GATA).sub.4 G ATC(TATC).sub.4 T TA(GATA).sub.4 GA TC(TATC).sub.4 TA A(GATA).sub.4 GAT C(TATC).sub. 4 TAT (GATA).sub.5 (TATC).sub.5 c. oligonucleotide ATA(GATA)GACA(GATA).sub.2 G TA(GATA)GACA(GATA).sub.2 GA A(GATA)GACA(GATA).sub.2 GAT (GATA)GACA(GATA).sub.3 ATAGACA(GATA).sub.3 G TAGACA(GATA).sub.3 GA AGACA(GATA).sub.3 GAT GACA(GATA).sub.4 ACA(GATA).sub.4 G CA(GATA).sub.4 GA A(GATA).sub.4 GAC (GATA).sub.4 GACA ATA(GATA).sub.3 GACAG TA(GATA).sub.3 GACAGA A(GATA).sub.3 GACAGAT (GATA).sub.3 GACA(GATA) ATA(GATA).sub.2 GACA(GATA)G TA(GATA).sub.2 GACA(GATA)GA A(GATA).sub.2 GACA(GATA)GAT (GATA)GACA(GATA).sub.2 or its complement sequence (TATC).sub.2 TGTC(TATC).sub.2 ATC(TATC)TGTC(TATC).sub.2 T TC(TATC)TGTC(TATC).sub.2 TA C(TATC)TGTC(TATC).sub.2 TAT (TATC)TAGTC(TATC).sub.3 ATCTGTC(TATC).sub.3 T TCTGTC(TATC).sub.3 TA CTGTC(TATC).sub.3 TAT TGTC(TATC).sub.4 GTC(TATC).sub.4 T TC(TATC).sub.4 TG C(TATC).sub.4 TGT (TATC).sub.4 TGTC ATC(TATC).sub.3 TGTCT TC(TATC).sub.3 TGTCTA C(TATC).sub.3 TGTCTAT (TATC).sub.3 TGTCTATC ATC(TATC).sub.2 TGTCTATCT TC(TATC).sub.2 TGTCTATCTA C(TATC).sub.2 TGTCTATCTAT (TATC).sub.4 TGTC(TATC).sub.2 (d) oligonucleotide or its complement sequence (GATA).sub.4 (TATC).sub.4 ATA(GATA).sub.3 G ATC(TATC).sub.3 T TA(GATA).sub.3 GA TC(TATC).sub.3 TA A(GATA).sub.3 GAT C(TATC).sub.3 TAT (GATA).sub.4 (TATC).sub.4 (GACA).sub.4 (TGTC).sub.4 ACA(GACA).sub.3 G GTC(TGTC).sub.3 T CA(GACA).sub.3 GA TC(TGTC).sub.3 TG A(GACA).sub.3 GAC C(TGTC).sub.3 TGT (GACA).sub.4 (TGTC).sub.4 (e) oligonucleotide or its complement sequence (GGAT).sub.4 (ATCC).sub.4 GAT(GGAT).sub.3 G TCC(ATCC).sub.3 A AT(GGAT).sub.3 GG CC(ATCC).sub.3 AT T(GGAT).sub.3 GGA C(ATCC).sub.3 ATC (GGAT).sub.4 (ATCC).sub.4 - ______________________________________
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 26 words
The process according to claim 15, wherein the oligonucleotide is (CCT) 5 or (CTC) 5 or their complement sequences (AGG) 5 or (GAG) 5 , respectively.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 30 words
The process according to claim 19, wherein the oligonucleotide is (TG) 8 or its complement sequence (CA) 8 or is (TC) 8 or its complement sequence (GA) 8 , respectively.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

GB2166445A Cited
GB2188323A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1994-01-21 1994-07-23 1995-01-22 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1998-01-21 1998-07-23 1999-01-22 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2002-01-21 2002-07-23 2003-01-22 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag