Patent US593852A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4987066A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4987066A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Process for the detection of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in eukaryotic genomes
Assignee: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften eV
•
Filing: 1987-09-25
•
Granted: 1991-01-22
•
Expires: 2007-09-25
Abstract
Abstract The invention is directed to a process for the analysis of eukaryotic DNA erein DNA of an individual is isolated, the DNA is subjected to restriction endonuclease digest, the cleaved DNA is separated by gel electrophoresis, the gel is dried and hybridized with a probe, and the pattern of the DNA is evaluated. The process is characterized in that the probe used is an oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple tandem repeats having a periodicity of 2 to 4 bases. The process of the invention may be employed for the in vitro diagnosis of genetic defects such as hereditary diseases or for the determination of the genetic interrelationships.
Inventors
- 👤 Jorg T. Epplen
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 08:02
CPC Classifications
C; C12; C12Q; C12Q1/00; C12Q1/68; C12Q1/6876; C12Q1/6813; C12Q1/6827; C12Q1/683; C12Q2600/00; C12Q2600/156
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 27
Claim 1
Independent Claim
94 words
In a process for the determination of the genetic interrelationships of individuals comprising analysis of eukaryotic DNA wherein DNA of an individual is isolated, the DNA is subjected to restriction endonuclease digests, the cleaved DNA is separated by gel electrophoresis, the gel is dried and hybridized with a probe, and the pattern of the DNA is evaluated and compared to that of other individuals, the improvement which comprises use of a probe which comprises a chemically synthesized oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple tandem repeats having a periodicity of 2 to 4 bases.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
94 words
In a process for the determination of the genetic interrelationships of individuals comprising analysis of eukaryotic DNA wherein DNA of an individual is isolated, the DNA is subjected to restriction endonuclease digests, the cleaved DNA is separated by gel electrophoresis, the gel is dried and hybridized with a probe, and the pattern of the DNA is evaluated and compared to that of other individuals, the improvement which comprises use of a probe which comprises a chemically synthesized oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple tandem repeats having a periodicity of 2 to 4 bases.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
17 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the DNA used is human or animal DNA.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
28 words
The process according to any one of claims 1 and 2, characterized in that the restriction enzyme used is Alu I, Hae III, Hinf I, or Mbo I.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
24 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the probe used is an oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple quadruplet repeats (sqr).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
33 words
The process according to claim 4, characterized in that the simple quadruplet repeats (sqr) recognized by the oligonucleotide probe in the eukaryotic genome are GA A sequences or their complement sequences T TC.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
19 words
The process according to claim 5, characterized in that the oligonucleotide has a length of 16 to 23 nucleotides.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
22 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (GATA) 4 GA or its complement sequence TC(TATC) 4 .
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
14 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that the nucleotide is a 20-mer.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (GATA) 5 or its complement sequence (TATC) 5 .
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
27 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that t he oligo nucleotide is (GATA) 2 GACA(GATA) 2 or its complement sequence (TATC) 2 TGTC(TATC) 2 .
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
28 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (GATA) 4 , (GACA) 4 , or their complement sequences (TATC) 4 or (TGTC) 4 .
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process according to claim 6, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (GGAT) 4 or its complement sequence (ATCC) 4 .
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
23 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the probe used is an oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple triplet repeats.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
30 words
The process according to claim 13, characterized in that the simple triplet repeats recognized by the oligonucleotide probe in the eukaryotic genome are TCC sequences or their complement sequences GGA.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
19 words
The process according to claim 14, characterized in that the oligonucleotide has a length of 15 to 24 nucleotides.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process according to claim 15, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (TCC) 5 or its complement sequence (GGA) 5 .
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
23 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the probe used is an oligonucleotide which specifically hybridizes to eukaryotic simple doublet repeats.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
30 words
The process according to claim 17, characterized in that the simple duplet repeats recognized by the oligonucleotide probe in the eukaryotic genome are GT sequences or their complement sequences AC.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
19 words
The process according to claim 18, characterized in that the oligonucleotide has a length of 16 to 24 nucleotides.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process according to claim 19, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (GT) 8 or its complement sequence (AC) 8 .
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process according to claim 19, characterized in that the oligonucleotide is (CT) 8 or its complement sequence (AG) 8 .
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
54 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the consecutive hybridization and evaluation operation comprises hybridizing the cleaved DNA with the radioactively labeled probe, removing the unhybridized part of the probe, exposing an X-ray film to the hybridized product, removing the hybridized product from the gel and repeating the operation with another probe.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
37 words
The process according to claim 1, characterized in that the hybridization and evaluation operation comprises transferring the cleaved DNA onto a solid support, hybridizing the DNA with the biotinylated probe and developing the hybridized product with strepdavidin.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
261 words
The process according to claim 6, wherein the oligonucleotide has one of the following sequences: ______________________________________
(a) oligonucleotide
(GATA).sub.4 GA
ATA(GATA).sub.3 GAG
TA(GATA).sub.3 GAGA
A(GATA).sub.3 GAGAT
(GATA).sub.3 GA(GATA)
ATA(GATA).sub.2 GA(GATA)G
TA(GATA).sub.2 GA(GATA)GA
A(GATA).sub.2 GA(GATA)GAT
(GATA).sub.2 GA(GATA).sub.2
ATA(GATA)GA(GATA).sub.2 G
TA(GATA)GA(GATA).sub.2 GA
A(GATA)GA(GATA).sub.2 GAT
(GATA)GA(GATA).sub.3
ATAGA(GATA).sub.3 G
TAGA(GATA).sub.3 GA
AGA(GATA).sub.3 GAT
GA(GATA).sub.4
A(GATA).sub.4 G
(GATA).sub.4 GA
or its complement sequence
TC(TATC).sub.4
C(TATC).sub.4 T
(TATC).sub.4 TC
ATC(TATC).sub.3 TCT
TC(TATC).sub.3 TCTA
C(TATC).sub.3 TCTAT
(TATC).sub.3 TC(TATC)
ATC(TATC).sub.2 TC(TATC)T
TC(TATC).sub.2 TC(TATC)TA
C(TATC).sub.2 TC(TATC)TAT
(TATC).sub.2 TC(TATC).sub.2
ATC(TATC)TC(TATC).sub.2 T
TC(TATC)TC(TATC).sub.2 TA
C(TATC)TC(TATC).sub.2 TAT
(TATC)TC(TATC).sub.3
ATCTC(TATC).sub.3 T
TCTC(TATC).sub.3 TA
CTC(TATC).sub.3 TAT
TC(TATC).sub.4
b. oligonucleotide
or its complement sequence
(GATA).sub.5 (TATC).sub.5
ATA(GATA).sub.4 G
ATC(TATC).sub.4 T
TA(GATA).sub.4 GA
TC(TATC).sub.4 TA
A(GATA).sub.4 GAT
C(TATC).sub. 4 TAT
(GATA).sub.5 (TATC).sub.5
c. oligonucleotide
ATA(GATA)GACA(GATA).sub.2 G
TA(GATA)GACA(GATA).sub.2 GA
A(GATA)GACA(GATA).sub.2 GAT
(GATA)GACA(GATA).sub.3
ATAGACA(GATA).sub.3 G
TAGACA(GATA).sub.3 GA
AGACA(GATA).sub.3 GAT
GACA(GATA).sub.4
ACA(GATA).sub.4 G
CA(GATA).sub.4 GA
A(GATA).sub.4 GAC
(GATA).sub.4 GACA
ATA(GATA).sub.3 GACAG
TA(GATA).sub.3 GACAGA
A(GATA).sub.3 GACAGAT
(GATA).sub.3 GACA(GATA)
ATA(GATA).sub.2 GACA(GATA)G
TA(GATA).sub.2 GACA(GATA)GA
A(GATA).sub.2 GACA(GATA)GAT
(GATA)GACA(GATA).sub.2
or its complement sequence
(TATC).sub.2 TGTC(TATC).sub.2
ATC(TATC)TGTC(TATC).sub.2 T
TC(TATC)TGTC(TATC).sub.2 TA
C(TATC)TGTC(TATC).sub.2 TAT
(TATC)TAGTC(TATC).sub.3
ATCTGTC(TATC).sub.3 T
TCTGTC(TATC).sub.3 TA
CTGTC(TATC).sub.3 TAT
TGTC(TATC).sub.4
GTC(TATC).sub.4 T
TC(TATC).sub.4 TG
C(TATC).sub.4 TGT
(TATC).sub.4 TGTC
ATC(TATC).sub.3 TGTCT
TC(TATC).sub.3 TGTCTA
C(TATC).sub.3 TGTCTAT
(TATC).sub.3 TGTCTATC
ATC(TATC).sub.2 TGTCTATCT
TC(TATC).sub.2 TGTCTATCTA
C(TATC).sub.2 TGTCTATCTAT
(TATC).sub.4 TGTC(TATC).sub.2
(d) oligonucleotide
or its complement sequence
(GATA).sub.4 (TATC).sub.4
ATA(GATA).sub.3 G
ATC(TATC).sub.3 T
TA(GATA).sub.3 GA
TC(TATC).sub.3 TA
A(GATA).sub.3 GAT
C(TATC).sub.3 TAT
(GATA).sub.4 (TATC).sub.4
(GACA).sub.4 (TGTC).sub.4
ACA(GACA).sub.3 G
GTC(TGTC).sub.3 T
CA(GACA).sub.3 GA
TC(TGTC).sub.3 TG
A(GACA).sub.3 GAC
C(TGTC).sub.3 TGT
(GACA).sub.4 (TGTC).sub.4
(e) oligonucleotide
or its complement sequence
(GGAT).sub.4 (ATCC).sub.4
GAT(GGAT).sub.3 G
TCC(ATCC).sub.3 A
AT(GGAT).sub.3 GG
CC(ATCC).sub.3 AT
T(GGAT).sub.3 GGA
C(ATCC).sub.3 ATC
(GGAT).sub.4 (ATCC).sub.4 -
______________________________________
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
26 words
The process according to claim 15, wherein the oligonucleotide is (CCT) 5 or (CTC) 5 or their complement sequences (AGG) 5 or (GAG) 5 , respectively.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
30 words
The process according to claim 19, wherein the oligonucleotide is (TG) 8 or its complement sequence (CA) 8 or is (TC) 8 or its complement sequence (GA) 8 , respectively.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
GB2166445A
Cited
GB2188323A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1994-01-21 | 1994-07-23 | 1995-01-22 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1998-01-21 | 1998-07-23 | 1999-01-22 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2002-01-21 | 2002-07-23 | 2003-01-22 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |