← Back to Patent Explorer
US6006303A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Priority encoding and decoding for memory architecture

Assignee: Oki Electric Industry Co Ltd
•
Filing: 1997-08-28
•
Granted: 1999-12-21
•
Expires: 2017-08-28
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A shared resource access priority encoding/decoding and arbitration scheme takes into account varying device requirements, including latency, bandwidth and throughput. These requirements are stored and are dynamically updated based on changing access demand conditions.

Inventors

  • 👤 Michael J. Barnaby
  • 👤 Abe Mammen

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-31 20:35
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F13/00; G06F13/14; G06F13/16; G06F13/1605; G06F13/18

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim 202 words
A shared resource access method for controlling access by a plurality of devices to a shared resource, the method comprising: establishing access priority based on a determination of device resource requirements, wherein the device resource requirements include at least one of base priority, latency, bandwidth, and throughput; granting access to the shared resource based on the establishing of access priority; and establishing a priority curve for each of the plurality of devices, wherein the priority curve represents a change in priority count with respect to a change in latency time; wherein the priority curve for each device comprises a first priority region, a second priority region, and a third priority region; wherein each of the first, second, and third priority regions has a respective rate of change of the priority count with respect to latency time; and wherein: in the first priority region, a device will permit preemption by another device but will not request preemption of another device; in the second priority region, a device will permit preemption by another device and will also request preemption of another device; and in the third priority region, a device will request preemption of another device but will not permit preemption by another device.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 202 words
A shared resource access method for controlling access by a plurality of devices to a shared resource, the method comprising: establishing access priority based on a determination of device resource requirements, wherein the device resource requirements include at least one of base priority, latency, bandwidth, and throughput; granting access to the shared resource based on the establishing of access priority; and establishing a priority curve for each of the plurality of devices, wherein the priority curve represents a change in priority count with respect to a change in latency time; wherein the priority curve for each device comprises a first priority region, a second priority region, and a third priority region; wherein each of the first, second, and third priority regions has a respective rate of change of the priority count with respect to latency time; and wherein: in the first priority region, a device will permit preemption by another device but will not request preemption of another device; in the second priority region, a device will permit preemption by another device and will also request preemption of another device; and in the third priority region, a device will request preemption of another device but will not permit preemption by another device.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 110 words
The method according to claim 1, further comprising: classifying devices in performance categories; wherein the performance categories include: a point-of-failure type device category for devices for which a failure occurs if a given latency tolerance for the device is exceeded; a performance sensitive type device category for devices for which performance is adversely affected to a first extent that is less than failure, if the given latency tolerance for the device is exceeded; and a no-impact lower priority type device category for devices for which performance is adversely affected to a second extent that is less than the first extent if the given latency tolerance for the device is exceeded.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 63 words
The method according to claim 2, further comprising determining priority based on the performance categories, including calculating the priority curves first for the point-of-failure type devices, then calculating the priority curves for the performance sensitive type devices, considering an amount of bandwidth remaining, and then calculating the priority curves for the no-impact lower priority type devices, considering an amount of bandwidth still remaining.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 234 words
A shared resource access system, which controls access by a plurality of devices to a shared resource, the system comprising: a priority encoder that receives resource access requests from the plurality of devices, and encodes priority values to the resource access requests, based on stored variables, to generate respective pending resource access requests; a priority decoder that decodes and compares the priority values of the pending resource access requests and determines a highest priority resource access request to be a winning request; an arbiter that arbitrates between an active resource access request and the winning request from the priority decoder and provides an access output; a resource controller that controls access to the shared resource based on the access output from the arbiter; and an address decoder that decodes at least one address in the shared resource for use by one of the plurality of devices that corresponds to the access output; wherein the stored variables include latency values corresponding to respective ones of the resource access requests; wherein the priority values include a value located on a priority curve representing a change in priority count with respect to a change in the latency value, wherein the priority curve is divided into a plurality of regions; and wherein each of the plurality of regions of the priority curve has a respective rate of change of the priority count with respect to the latency value.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 234 words
A shared resource access system, which controls access by a plurality of devices to a shared resource, the system comprising: a priority encoder that receives resource access requests from the plurality of devices, and encodes priority values to the resource access requests, based on stored variables, to generate respective pending resource access requests; a priority decoder that decodes and compares the priority values of the pending resource access requests and determines a highest priority resource access request to be a winning request; an arbiter that arbitrates between an active resource access request and the winning request from the priority decoder and provides an access output; a resource controller that controls access to the shared resource based on the access output from the arbiter; and an address decoder that decodes at least one address in the shared resource for use by one of the plurality of devices that corresponds to the access output; wherein the stored variables include latency values corresponding to respective ones of the resource access requests; wherein the priority values include a value located on a priority curve representing a change in priority count with respect to a change in the latency value, wherein the priority curve is divided into a plurality of regions; and wherein each of the plurality of regions of the priority curve has a respective rate of change of the priority count with respect to the latency value.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 68 words
The shared resource access system of claim 4, wherein a first rate of change of the priority count in a first region of the priority curve having a first latency value is greater than a second rate of change of the priority count in a second region of the priority curve having a second latency value, where the first latency value is greater than the second latency value.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 137 words
A shared resource access method for controlling access by a plurality of devices to a shared resource, the method comprising: establishing resource access priority for each of the respective plurality of devices, based on a determination of respective device resource requirements; and granting access to the shared resource based on the established resource access priority; wherein the device resource requirements include latency values for the respective devices; wherein establishing resource access priority includes establishing a priority curve for each of the respective devices, representing a change in a priority count of the respective device with respect to a change in the latency values; and wherein the priority curve is divided into a plurality of regions, wherein each of the plurality of regions has a respective rate of change of the priority count with respect to latency value.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 137 words
A shared resource access method for controlling access by a plurality of devices to a shared resource, the method comprising: establishing resource access priority for each of the respective plurality of devices, based on a determination of respective device resource requirements; and granting access to the shared resource based on the established resource access priority; wherein the device resource requirements include latency values for the respective devices; wherein establishing resource access priority includes establishing a priority curve for each of the respective devices, representing a change in a priority count of the respective device with respect to a change in the latency values; and wherein the priority curve is divided into a plurality of regions, wherein each of the plurality of regions has a respective rate of change of the priority count with respect to latency value.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 65 words
The method of claim 6, wherein a first rate of change of the priority count in a first region of the priority curve having a first latency value is greater than a second rate of change of the priority count in a second region of the priority curve having a second latency value, where the first latency value is greater than the second latency value.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2002-12-20 2003-06-21 2003-12-21 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2006-12-20 2007-06-21 2007-12-21 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2010-12-20 2011-06-21 2011-12-21 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag