Patent US4923800A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4923800A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Instrumentless quantitative analysis system
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1987-07-15
•
Granted: 1990-05-08
•
Expires: 2007-07-15
Abstract
Abstract A general and versatile method for quantitation of a variety of analytes which supplies a directly observable result not requiring instrumentation is disclosed. The method is based on competing enzymic reactions, wherein one of the reactions is capable of forming a directly observable product, which is a colored product. Direct quantitation is obtained by altering the relative amount of competing reaction catalyst with respect to control reaction catalyst. Materials capable of analysis using this method include enzyme substrates, enzymes, immunogens, and specific affinity binding partners.
Inventors
- 👤 Uy-Vu Ly
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 18:38
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N33/00; G01N33/48; G01N33/50; G01N33/53; G01N33/531; G01N33/532; G01N33/535; C; C12; C12Q; C12Q1/00; C12Q1/54; G01N33/543; G01N33/54366; G01N33/54386; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S435/00; Y10S435/805
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 34
Claim 1
Independent Claim
236 words
A method for determining the concentration of an analyte in a sample comprising: dividing a sample into a plurality of individual testing portions: combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least a first catalyst capable of reacting with said analyte in a first reaction, said second reaction components including at least a second catalyst capable of reacting with said analyte in a second reaction in competition with said first catalyst; wherein the ratio of the concentrations of said first catalyst and second catalyst are different in each one of said individual testing portions, and wherein the ratio varies systematically over the plurality of testing portions; wherein either said first reaction or second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, and the other of said first and second reaction is a nonindicator reaction which does not produce a detectable result, whereby an array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of indicator reaction catalyst to nonindicator reaction catalyst is high, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in test portions wherein said ratio is low, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of analyte in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
236 words
A method for determining the concentration of an analyte in a sample comprising: dividing a sample into a plurality of individual testing portions: combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least a first catalyst capable of reacting with said analyte in a first reaction, said second reaction components including at least a second catalyst capable of reacting with said analyte in a second reaction in competition with said first catalyst; wherein the ratio of the concentrations of said first catalyst and second catalyst are different in each one of said individual testing portions, and wherein the ratio varies systematically over the plurality of testing portions; wherein either said first reaction or second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, and the other of said first and second reaction is a nonindicator reaction which does not produce a detectable result, whereby an array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of indicator reaction catalyst to nonindicator reaction catalyst is high, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in test portions wherein said ratio is low, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of analyte in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the first reaction is the indicator reaction so that for the same concentration of analyte in testing portions where the ratio of first to second catalyst is high, said indicator reaction is detectable and in testing portions where the ratio of first to second catalyst is low, said indicator reaction is nondetectable.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the second reaction is the indicator reaction so that in testing portions where the ratio of the second to first catalyst is high, said indicator reaction is detectable and in testing portions where the ratio of second to first catalyst is low, said indicator reaction is nondetectable.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said first and second reactions are conducted on a solid support matrix.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the analyte is glucose, the first catalyst is glucose oxidase, and the second catalyst is hexokinase.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 5 wherein the first reaction is the indicator reaction and the detectable result is produced by utilizing the hydrogen peroxide produced in the first reaction to form a colored dye.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the analyte is glucose, the first reaction catalyst is hexokinase, and the second reaction catalyst is glucose oxidase.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 7 wherein the first reaction is the indicator reaction and the detectable result is produced by utilizing the glucose-6-phosphate produced in the first reaction in a coupled enzyme series to produce NADH 2 .
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 8 wherein the NADH 2 reduces an oxidized dye to obtain a visible color.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
266 words
A method for determining the concentration of an analyte in a sample comprising: (a) converting said analyte to a secondary analyte and (b) dividing the sample into a plurality of individual testing portions; wherein steps (a) and (b) can be performed in either order; followed by combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least a first catalyst capable of reacting with said secondary analyte in a first reaction, said second reaction components including at least a second catalyst capable of reacting with said secondary analyte in a second reaction in competition with said first catalyst; wherein the ratio of the concentrations of said first catalyst and second catalyst are different in each one of said individual testing portions, and wherein the ratio varies systematically over the plurality of testing portions; wherein either said first reaction or second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, and the other of said first and second reaction is a nonindicator reaction which does not produce a detectable result, whereby an array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of indicator reaction catalyst to nonindicator reaction catalyst is high, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in testing portions wherein said ratio is low, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of secondary analyte and thereby of analyte in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
266 words
A method for determining the concentration of an analyte in a sample comprising: (a) converting said analyte to a secondary analyte and (b) dividing the sample into a plurality of individual testing portions; wherein steps (a) and (b) can be performed in either order; followed by combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least a first catalyst capable of reacting with said secondary analyte in a first reaction, said second reaction components including at least a second catalyst capable of reacting with said secondary analyte in a second reaction in competition with said first catalyst; wherein the ratio of the concentrations of said first catalyst and second catalyst are different in each one of said individual testing portions, and wherein the ratio varies systematically over the plurality of testing portions; wherein either said first reaction or second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, and the other of said first and second reaction is a nonindicator reaction which does not produce a detectable result, whereby an array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of indicator reaction catalyst to nonindicator reaction catalyst is high, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in testing portions wherein said ratio is low, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of secondary analyte and thereby of analyte in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the first reaction is the indicator reaction so that in test portions where the ratio of first to second catalyst is high, said indicator reaction is detectable and in testing portions where the ratio of first to second catalyst is low, said indicator reaction is nondetectable.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the second reaction is the indicator reaction so that in testing portions where the ratio of the second to first catalyst is high, said indicator reaction is detectable and in testing portions where the ratio of second to first catalyst is low, said indicator reaction is nondetectable.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the analyte is glucose and the secondary analyte is generated by reacting the glucose with glucose oxidase and oxygen.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
25 words
THe method of claim 10 wherein the analyte is cholesterol and the secondary analyte is generated by reacting the cholesterol with cholesterol oxidase and oxygen.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the analyte is uric acid and the secondary analyte is generated by reacting the analyte with oxygen and uricase.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
66 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the analyte is one or more triglycerides and wherein the secondary analyte is generated by treating the analyte with a coupled enzyme system wherein the reactions are conducted by reacting the sample with lipase (EC 3.1.13) and water, reacting the resultant thereof with ATP and glycerol kinase (EC 2.71.30), and reacting the resultant thereof with oxygen and L-α-glycerol phosphate oxidase.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the analyte is creatinine and the secondary analyte is generated by reacting the analyte with water and creatinine amidinohydrolase (EC 3.5.3.3) and the product thereof with sarcosine oxidase.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the secondary analyte is NADH 2 , the first reaction catalyst is diaphorase, and the second reaction catalyst is lactate dehydrogenase.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 18 wherein the analyte is glucose and the secondary analyte is generated by treating the analyte with ATP and hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the secondary analyte is hydrogen peroxide, the first reaction catalyst is peroxidase, and the second reaction catalyst is catalase.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 20 wherein the first reaction is the indicator reaction and the detectable result is a dye.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 21 wherein the dye is a quinoneimine dye.
Claim 25
Independent Claim
213 words
A method for determining the concentration of lactate dehydrogenase in a sample comprising: dividing a sample into a plurality of individual testing portions; combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least an excess of pyruvate and a limiting amount of NADH 2 capable of reacting with said lactate dehydrogenase in a first reaction, said second reaction components including at least diaphorase and an oxidized dye capable of reacting with said NADH 2 in a second reaction in competition with said lactate dehydrogenase, the concentration of said diaphorase being different in each one of said individual testing portions, and wherein NADH 2 is added last to the testing portions, wherein said second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, whereby the array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of lactate dehydrogenase to diaphorase is low, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in testing portions wherein said ratio is high, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of lactate dehydrogenase in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
Claim 26
Independent Claim
213 words
A method for determining the concentration of lactate dehydrogenase in a sample comprising: dividing a sample into a plurality of individual testing portions; combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least an excess of pyruvate and a limiting amount of NADH 2 capable of reacting with said lactate dehydrogenase in a first reaction, said second reaction components including at least diaphorase and an oxidized dye capable of reacting with said NADH 2 in a second reaction in competition with said lactate dehydrogenase, the concentration of said diaphorase being different in each one of said individual testing portions, and wherein NADH 2 is added last to the testing portions, wherein said second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, whereby the array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of lactate dehydrogenase to diaphorase is low, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in testing portions wherein said ratio is high, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of lactate dehydrogenase in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
Claim 27
Independent Claim
237 words
A method for determining the concentration of alanine aminotransferase in a sample comprising: dividing a sample into a plurality of individual testing portions; combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least pyruvate in excess and a limiting amount of L-glutamate capable of reacting with said alanine aminotransferase in a first reaction, said second reaction components including at least NAD + and glutamate dehydrogenase capable of reaction with said L-glutamate in a second reaction in competition with said alanine aminotransferase, the concentration of said glutamate dehydrogenase being different in each one of said individual testing portions, and wherein L-glutamate is added last to the testing portions, wherein either said first reaction or second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, and the other of said first or second reaction is a nonindicator reaction which does not produce a detectable result, whereby the array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of indicator reaction catalyst to nonindicator reaction catalyst is high, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in testing portions wherein said ratio is low, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of alanine aminotransferase in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
Claim 28
Independent Claim
237 words
A method for determining the concentration of alanine aminotransferase in a sample comprising: dividing a sample into a plurality of individual testing portions; combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least pyruvate in excess and a limiting amount of L-glutamate capable of reacting with said alanine aminotransferase in a first reaction, said second reaction components including at least NAD + and glutamate dehydrogenase capable of reaction with said L-glutamate in a second reaction in competition with said alanine aminotransferase, the concentration of said glutamate dehydrogenase being different in each one of said individual testing portions, and wherein L-glutamate is added last to the testing portions, wherein either said first reaction or second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, and the other of said first or second reaction is a nonindicator reaction which does not produce a detectable result, whereby the array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of indicator reaction catalyst to nonindicator reaction catalyst is high, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in testing portions wherein said ratio is low, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of alanine aminotransferase in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 24 wherein the second reaction is an indicator reaction conducted by contacting the resultant of said glutamate dehydrogenase reaction with diaphorase and an oxidized dye.
Claim 30
Independent Claim
237 words
A method for determining the concentration of aspartate aminotransferase in a sample comprising: dividing a sample into a plurality of individual testing portions; combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least an excess of oxalacetate and a limiting amount of L-glutamate capable of reacting with said aspartate aminotransferase in a first reaction, said second reaction component including at least NAD+ and glutamate dehydrogenase capable of reacting with said L-glutamate in a second reaction in competition with said aspartate aminotransferase, the concentration of said glutamate dehydrogenase being different in each one of said individual testing portions, and wherein L-glutamate is added last to the testing portions, wherein either said first reaction or second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, and the other of said first or second reaction is a nonindicator reaction which does not produce a detectable result. whereby the array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of indicator reaction catalyst to nonindicator reaction catalyst is high, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in testing portions wherein said ratio is low, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of aspartate aminotransferase in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
Claim 31
Independent Claim
237 words
A method for determining the concentration of aspartate aminotransferase in a sample comprising: dividing a sample into a plurality of individual testing portions; combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least an excess of oxalacetate and a limiting amount of L-glutamate capable of reacting with said aspartate aminotransferase in a first reaction, said second reaction component including at least NAD+ and glutamate dehydrogenase capable of reacting with said L-glutamate in a second reaction in competition with said aspartate aminotransferase, the concentration of said glutamate dehydrogenase being different in each one of said individual testing portions, and wherein L-glutamate is added last to the testing portions, wherein either said first reaction or second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, and the other of said first or second reaction is a nonindicator reaction which does not produce a detectable result. whereby the array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of indicator reaction catalyst to nonindicator reaction catalyst is high, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in testing portions wherein said ratio is low, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of aspartate aminotransferase in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the second reaction is an indicator reaction conducted by contacting the resultant of said glutamate dehydrogenase reaction with diaphorase and an oxidized dye.
Claim 33
Independent Claim
255 words
A method for determining the concentration of a catalyst-analyte in a sample, which catalyst-analyte is reactive with a substrate common to a first and second reaction comprising: dividing a sample into a plurality of individual testing portions; combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least a substrate capable of reacting with said catalyst-analyte in a first reaction, said second reaction components including at least a second catalyst capable of reacting with said substrate in a second reaction in competition with said catalyst-analyte, the concentration of said second catalyst being different in each one of said individual testing portions; and wherein said substrate is combined with each testing portion at least no sooner than are the remaining first reaction components and the second reaction components; wherein either said first reaction or second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, and the other of said first and second reaction is a nonindicator reaction which does not produce a detectable result, whereby an array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of indicator reaction catalyst to nonindicator reaction catalyst is high, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in test portions wherein said ratio is low, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of catalyst-analyte in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
Claim 34
Independent Claim
255 words
A method for determining the concentration of a catalyst-analyte in a sample, which catalyst-analyte is reactive with a substrate common to a first and second reaction comprising: dividing a sample into a plurality of individual testing portions; combining each one of said plurality of testing portions with first reaction and second reaction components, said first reaction components including at least a substrate capable of reacting with said catalyst-analyte in a first reaction, said second reaction components including at least a second catalyst capable of reacting with said substrate in a second reaction in competition with said catalyst-analyte, the concentration of said second catalyst being different in each one of said individual testing portions; and wherein said substrate is combined with each testing portion at least no sooner than are the remaining first reaction components and the second reaction components; wherein either said first reaction or second reaction is an indicator reaction which produces a detectable result, and the other of said first and second reaction is a nonindicator reaction which does not produce a detectable result, whereby an array of testing portions having different results is obtained, such that in testing portions where the ratio of indicator reaction catalyst to nonindicator reaction catalyst is high, the result of the indicator reaction is detectable, and in test portions wherein said ratio is low, the result of said indicator reaction is not detectable, whereby the concentration of catalyst-analyte in said sample is determinable by observing the point at which changeover from detectable to nondetectable indicator reaction occurs.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-05-07 | 1993-11-06 | 1994-05-08 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-05-07 | 1997-11-06 | 1998-05-08 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-05-07 | 2001-11-06 | 2002-05-08 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |