Patent US5510246A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5510246A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method for rapid quantification of microorganism growth

Assignee: 3M Co
•
Filing: 1994-12-15
•
Granted: 1996-04-23
•
Expires: 2014-12-15
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Changes in specified indicia of colony growth in the early stages of incubation are monitored to provide the early detection and enumeration of colonies in the growth medium. Data from images collected at different times is processed to enhance the detection of subtle changes in the specified indicia of colony growth and provide an early indication of the number of colonies present in the growth medium.

Inventors

  • 👤 Scott D. Morgan

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-06 21:19
CPC Classifications
C; C12; C12Q; C12Q1/00; C12Q1/02; C12Q1/04; C12Q1/06; C12M; C12M41/00; C12M41/30; C12M41/36; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S435/00; Y10S435/808

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim 413 words
A method to count microbial colonies growing on an inoculated growth medium adhered to a substantially planar culturing device comprising the steps of: a) obtaining a filtered mask image of the culturing device to identify pixels in the mask image which lie outside of the inoculated growth medium in order to prevent processing of pixels which lie outside of the growth medium; b) obtaining a filtered noise image of the culturing device to identify pixels in the filtered noise image having measured intensities outside of a predetermined range of intensities and which lie inside of the growth medium in order to prevent processing of pixels having measured intensities outside of a predetermined range of intensities which lie inside of the growth medium; c) obtaining a filtered background image of the culturing device to provide background image data which excludes pixels identified in steps a) and b); d) incubating the inoculated growth medium for a selected time interval; e) obtaining a first filtered image of the culturing device to provide first image data; f) processing the background and first image data to produce a difference image wherein the difference image is obtained by taking a difference between the first filtered image data and the background image data; g) processing the difference image to identify hit pixels which are local maxima, wherein a hit pixel is determined by the steps of: 1) testing a pixel value at a center pixel for compliance with a value; 2) testing at least two neighboring pixel values directly adjacent to the center pixel to insure that the immediate neighboring pixels have values less than the center pixel value; 3) testing pixels adjacent to each of the neighboring pixels of step 2) which are neighbors once removed to the center pixel to insure that they have a value less than the value of an adjacent neighboring pixel; and 4) labeling each center pixel which satisfies the tests of steps 1), 2) and 3) as a hit pixel; and 5) clustering the hit pixels by dilating each of the hit pixels to encompass a matrix and expanding the matrix to encompass hit pixels which overlap one another wherein a number of matrices on the growth medium corresponds to a number of microbial colonies in the growth medium; h) storing a position and number of matrices which correspond to a count of the microbial colonies in the growth medium; and i) providing a count of the microbial colonies in the growth medium.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 413 words
A method to count microbial colonies growing on an inoculated growth medium adhered to a substantially planar culturing device comprising the steps of: a) obtaining a filtered mask image of the culturing device to identify pixels in the mask image which lie outside of the inoculated growth medium in order to prevent processing of pixels which lie outside of the growth medium; b) obtaining a filtered noise image of the culturing device to identify pixels in the filtered noise image having measured intensities outside of a predetermined range of intensities and which lie inside of the growth medium in order to prevent processing of pixels having measured intensities outside of a predetermined range of intensities which lie inside of the growth medium; c) obtaining a filtered background image of the culturing device to provide background image data which excludes pixels identified in steps a) and b); d) incubating the inoculated growth medium for a selected time interval; e) obtaining a first filtered image of the culturing device to provide first image data; f) processing the background and first image data to produce a difference image wherein the difference image is obtained by taking a difference between the first filtered image data and the background image data; g) processing the difference image to identify hit pixels which are local maxima, wherein a hit pixel is determined by the steps of: 1) testing a pixel value at a center pixel for compliance with a value; 2) testing at least two neighboring pixel values directly adjacent to the center pixel to insure that the immediate neighboring pixels have values less than the center pixel value; 3) testing pixels adjacent to each of the neighboring pixels of step 2) which are neighbors once removed to the center pixel to insure that they have a value less than the value of an adjacent neighboring pixel; and 4) labeling each center pixel which satisfies the tests of steps 1), 2) and 3) as a hit pixel; and 5) clustering the hit pixels by dilating each of the hit pixels to encompass a matrix and expanding the matrix to encompass hit pixels which overlap one another wherein a number of matrices on the growth medium corresponds to a number of microbial colonies in the growth medium; h) storing a position and number of matrices which correspond to a count of the microbial colonies in the growth medium; and i) providing a count of the microbial colonies in the growth medium.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 131 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising obtaining a second filtered image to provide second image data, processing the background image data of step c) and second image data to produce a second difference image, wherein the second difference image is obtained by taking a difference between the second image data and the background image data, processing the second difference image by comparing a value of inside hit pixels lying within a perimeter of previously identified matrices with a value of corresponding outside hit pixels adjacent to the inside hit pixels and to hit pixels outside the matrix; expanding matrices having at least two inside hit pixels with a value greater than the corresponding outside hit pixels to provide enlarged matrices and storing the position and number of the enlarged matrices.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method of claim 2 further comprising identifying additional hit pixels according to steps 1) to 5) and adding the position and count of additional matrices to the position and number of enlarged matrices.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 16 words
The method of claim 3 further comprising obtaining additional filtered images collected at successive time intervals.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the first and second filtered images are detected at light wavelengths of about 550 nm.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the filtered mask image is detected at light wavelengths of about 650 nm.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the filtered noise image is detected at light wavelengths of about 450 nm.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 47 words
The method of claim 1 wherein a count of the microbial colonies in the growth medium is too numerous to count if an average pixel value of the first filtered image is greater than a predetermined value of an average pixel value of the filtered background image.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 8 wherein the predetermined value is about 15% or more of an average pixel value of the filtered background image.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1999-04-23 1999-10-23 2000-04-23 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2003-04-23 2003-10-23 2004-04-23 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2007-04-23 2007-10-23 2008-04-23 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag