Patent US5510246A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5510246A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for rapid quantification of microorganism growth
Assignee: 3M Co
•
Filing: 1994-12-15
•
Granted: 1996-04-23
•
Expires: 2014-12-15
Abstract
Abstract Changes in specified indicia of colony growth in the early stages of incubation are monitored to provide the early detection and enumeration of colonies in the growth medium. Data from images collected at different times is processed to enhance the detection of subtle changes in the specified indicia of colony growth and provide an early indication of the number of colonies present in the growth medium.
Inventors
- 👤 Scott D. Morgan
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 21:19
CPC Classifications
C; C12; C12Q; C12Q1/00; C12Q1/02; C12Q1/04; C12Q1/06; C12M; C12M41/00; C12M41/30; C12M41/36; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S435/00; Y10S435/808
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
413 words
A method to count microbial colonies growing on an inoculated growth medium adhered to a substantially planar culturing device comprising the steps of: a) obtaining a filtered mask image of the culturing device to identify pixels in the mask image which lie outside of the inoculated growth medium in order to prevent processing of pixels which lie outside of the growth medium; b) obtaining a filtered noise image of the culturing device to identify pixels in the filtered noise image having measured intensities outside of a predetermined range of intensities and which lie inside of the growth medium in order to prevent processing of pixels having measured intensities outside of a predetermined range of intensities which lie inside of the growth medium; c) obtaining a filtered background image of the culturing device to provide background image data which excludes pixels identified in steps a) and b); d) incubating the inoculated growth medium for a selected time interval; e) obtaining a first filtered image of the culturing device to provide first image data; f) processing the background and first image data to produce a difference image wherein the difference image is obtained by taking a difference between the first filtered image data and the background image data; g) processing the difference image to identify hit pixels which are local maxima, wherein a hit pixel is determined by the steps of: 1) testing a pixel value at a center pixel for compliance with a value; 2) testing at least two neighboring pixel values directly adjacent to the center pixel to insure that the immediate neighboring pixels have values less than the center pixel value; 3) testing pixels adjacent to each of the neighboring pixels of step 2) which are neighbors once removed to the center pixel to insure that they have a value less than the value of an adjacent neighboring pixel; and 4) labeling each center pixel which satisfies the tests of steps 1), 2) and 3) as a hit pixel; and 5) clustering the hit pixels by dilating each of the hit pixels to encompass a matrix and expanding the matrix to encompass hit pixels which overlap one another wherein a number of matrices on the growth medium corresponds to a number of microbial colonies in the growth medium; h) storing a position and number of matrices which correspond to a count of the microbial colonies in the growth medium; and i) providing a count of the microbial colonies in the growth medium.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
413 words
A method to count microbial colonies growing on an inoculated growth medium adhered to a substantially planar culturing device comprising the steps of: a) obtaining a filtered mask image of the culturing device to identify pixels in the mask image which lie outside of the inoculated growth medium in order to prevent processing of pixels which lie outside of the growth medium; b) obtaining a filtered noise image of the culturing device to identify pixels in the filtered noise image having measured intensities outside of a predetermined range of intensities and which lie inside of the growth medium in order to prevent processing of pixels having measured intensities outside of a predetermined range of intensities which lie inside of the growth medium; c) obtaining a filtered background image of the culturing device to provide background image data which excludes pixels identified in steps a) and b); d) incubating the inoculated growth medium for a selected time interval; e) obtaining a first filtered image of the culturing device to provide first image data; f) processing the background and first image data to produce a difference image wherein the difference image is obtained by taking a difference between the first filtered image data and the background image data; g) processing the difference image to identify hit pixels which are local maxima, wherein a hit pixel is determined by the steps of: 1) testing a pixel value at a center pixel for compliance with a value; 2) testing at least two neighboring pixel values directly adjacent to the center pixel to insure that the immediate neighboring pixels have values less than the center pixel value; 3) testing pixels adjacent to each of the neighboring pixels of step 2) which are neighbors once removed to the center pixel to insure that they have a value less than the value of an adjacent neighboring pixel; and 4) labeling each center pixel which satisfies the tests of steps 1), 2) and 3) as a hit pixel; and 5) clustering the hit pixels by dilating each of the hit pixels to encompass a matrix and expanding the matrix to encompass hit pixels which overlap one another wherein a number of matrices on the growth medium corresponds to a number of microbial colonies in the growth medium; h) storing a position and number of matrices which correspond to a count of the microbial colonies in the growth medium; and i) providing a count of the microbial colonies in the growth medium.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
131 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising obtaining a second filtered image to provide second image data, processing the background image data of step c) and second image data to produce a second difference image, wherein the second difference image is obtained by taking a difference between the second image data and the background image data, processing the second difference image by comparing a value of inside hit pixels lying within a perimeter of previously identified matrices with a value of corresponding outside hit pixels adjacent to the inside hit pixels and to hit pixels outside the matrix; expanding matrices having at least two inside hit pixels with a value greater than the corresponding outside hit pixels to provide enlarged matrices and storing the position and number of the enlarged matrices.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 2 further comprising identifying additional hit pixels according to steps 1) to 5) and adding the position and count of additional matrices to the position and number of enlarged matrices.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 3 further comprising obtaining additional filtered images collected at successive time intervals.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the first and second filtered images are detected at light wavelengths of about 550 nm.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the filtered mask image is detected at light wavelengths of about 650 nm.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the filtered noise image is detected at light wavelengths of about 450 nm.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 1 wherein a count of the microbial colonies in the growth medium is too numerous to count if an average pixel value of the first filtered image is greater than a predetermined value of an average pixel value of the filtered background image.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 8 wherein the predetermined value is about 15% or more of an average pixel value of the filtered background image.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3493772A
Cited
US3736432A
Cited
US3764480A
Cited
US3811036A
Cited
US3972778A
Cited
DE2443410A1
Cited
US4116775A
Cited
US4118280A
Cited
US4456380A
Cited
JPS59187777A
Cited
US4536239A
Cited
US4637053A
Cited
US4700298A
Cited
JPS6260069A
Cited
US4724543A
Cited
US4896966A
Cited
FR2603074A1
Cited
US4922092A
Cited
SU1434465A1
Cited
EP0301600A2
Cited
US5003611A
Cited
DE3916804A1
Cited
US5117467A
Cited
JPH026729A
Cited
GB2227346A
Cited
WO1993014599A1
Cited
WO1994001528A1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-04-23 | 1999-10-23 | 2000-04-23 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-04-23 | 2003-10-23 | 2004-04-23 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-04-23 | 2007-10-23 | 2008-04-23 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |