US6799066B2
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Technique for manipulating medical images
Assignee: Leland Stanford Junior University
•
Filing: 2001-09-14
•
Granted: 2004-09-28
•
Expires: 2021-09-14
Abstract
Abstract The invention and the embodiments described in this invention provide new techniques for manipulating digital images and is particularly useful for extracting tissues (i.e., assigning tissue boundary locations) from medical images. These techniques can be applied to diagnosing arthritis and for monitoring disease progression or response to therapeutic intervention. The invention provides for means to extract the articular cartilage from medical images for analysis purposes.
Inventors
- 👤 Daniel Steines
- 👤 Philipp Lang
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 10:52
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T7/00; G06T7/0002; G06T7/0012; A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/05; A61B5/055; A61B5/103; A61B5/1036; A61B5/1038; A61B5/45; A61B5/4514; G01; G01R; G01R33/00; G01R33/20; G01R33/44; G01R33/48; G01R33/50; G01R33/54; G01R33/56; G06T7/10; G06T7/12; A61B5/107; A61B5/1075; A61B5/4528; G01R33/5608; G06T2207/00; G06T2207/10; G06T2207/10072; G06T2207/10088; G06T2207/30; G06T2207/30004; G06T2207/30008
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
318 words
A method of assessing a digital image to determine a boundary between first and second image components, which comprises: (a) selecting a first boundary element between two pixels being evaluated for assignment to the first or second image component; (b) determining a first value of a first pixel on one side of the first boundary element; (c) determining a second value of a second pixel on the other side of the first boundary element; (d) comparing the first and second value to determine magnitude of a gradient across the first boundary element and assigning a gradient boundary value to the first boundary element; (e) determining relative locations of (1) the first boundary element and (2) a reference element selected from the group consisting of (2a) a reference boundary element previously assigned as separating a pixel assigned to the first image component from a pixel assigned to the second image component and (2b) a reference second-boundary element previously assigned as separating a pixel assigned to one of the first and second image components from a third image component, the second-boundary element having a known, statistically significant distance or angle relationship relative to an actual boundary between real components represented by the first and second image components, and assigning a location boundary value to the first boundary element based on distance or angle of the relative locations from each other; (f) mathematically combining the gradient boundary value and the location boundary value to provide a first potential boundary value for the first boundary element; repeating steps (a)-(f) for a second boundary element to obtain a second potential boundary value; and (g) assigning the first boundary element or the second boundary element as dividing the first image component from the second image component, depending on relative potential boundary values of the first and second boundary elements, wherein said method is used to locate a bone/cartilage interface or an external cartilage surface.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
318 words
A method of assessing a digital image to determine a boundary between first and second image components, which comprises: (a) selecting a first boundary element between two pixels being evaluated for assignment to the first or second image component; (b) determining a first value of a first pixel on one side of the first boundary element; (c) determining a second value of a second pixel on the other side of the first boundary element; (d) comparing the first and second value to determine magnitude of a gradient across the first boundary element and assigning a gradient boundary value to the first boundary element; (e) determining relative locations of (1) the first boundary element and (2) a reference element selected from the group consisting of (2a) a reference boundary element previously assigned as separating a pixel assigned to the first image component from a pixel assigned to the second image component and (2b) a reference second-boundary element previously assigned as separating a pixel assigned to one of the first and second image components from a third image component, the second-boundary element having a known, statistically significant distance or angle relationship relative to an actual boundary between real components represented by the first and second image components, and assigning a location boundary value to the first boundary element based on distance or angle of the relative locations from each other; (f) mathematically combining the gradient boundary value and the location boundary value to provide a first potential boundary value for the first boundary element; repeating steps (a)-(f) for a second boundary element to obtain a second potential boundary value; and (g) assigning the first boundary element or the second boundary element as dividing the first image component from the second image component, depending on relative potential boundary values of the first and second boundary elements, wherein said method is used to locate a bone/cartilage interface or an external cartilage surface.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said image is a magnetic resonance image, an ultrasound image, or an X-ray image.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 2 , wherein said cartilage is diseased or damaged.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said method assigns said boundary element to said first or second image component using existing knowledge of probable shape of said first or second image component.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 4 , wherein said digital image is of a living subject and said first and second image components comprise first and second tissues of said living subject.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 5 , wherein said knowledge is obtained from (a) information derived from same-type tissue images of other subjects or (b) information derived from a different image obtained from said living subject or from a different region of said tissue image.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 6 , wherein said other subjects are age and sex matched or weight matched with said living subject.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 6 , wherein said information is (a) cartilage thickness, cartilage curvature or cartilage shape in a contralateral joint or in a different region of a first joint whose image is being assessed or (b) curvature or shape of a bone in said first joint.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 8 , wherein said bone is subchondral bone.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 9 , wherein curvature or shape of the subchondral bone is used to estimate curvature or shape of overlying articular cartilage.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
105 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said method is used to assess condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method further comprises: (a) electronically transferring an electronically generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device; (b) receiving the transferred image at the distant location; (c) extracting said cartilage from said transferred image using the method of claim 1 ; (d) converting the transferred image to a normal or degeneration pattern of the cartilage; and (e) transmitting said normal or said degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 11 , wherein said normal or said degeneration pattern is stored in a database.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein all steps are carried out at an initial time T1 and are carried out again at a later time T2.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 13 , wherein the assessment includes an analysis of the degree of degeneration of the cartilage between T1 and T2.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said digital image of a cartilage is obtained by a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4655227A
Cited
US4699156A
Cited
US4813436A
Cited
US4823807A
Cited
US5099859A
Cited
US5246013A
Cited
US5154178A
Cited
US5853746A
Cited
US5433215A
Cited
US5503162A
Cited
US5749362A
Cited
US5320102A
Cited
US5445152A
Cited
US5564437A
Cited
US5899859A
Cited
US5772595A
Cited
US5810006A
Cited
US5413116A
Cited
US5541515A
Cited
US5682886A
Cited
US6175655B1
Cited
US5824085A
Cited
US5928945A
Cited
US5779651A
Cited
US6289753B1
Cited
US6205411B1
Cited
US6002859A
Cited
US5995738A
Cited
US5880976A
Cited
US6078680A
Cited
US5913821A
Cited
US6161080A
Cited
US6316153B1
Cited
US6533737B1
Cited
US6450978B1
Cited
US20020087274A1
Cited
US6310619B1
Cited
US6310477B1
Cited
US6560476B1
Cited
US6334066B1
Cited
US20020016543A1
Cited
US6249692B1
Cited
WO2002022014A1
Cited
US20020147392A1
Cited
US20030015208A1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2007-09-28 | 2008-03-29 | 2008-09-28 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2011-09-28 | 2012-03-29 | 2012-09-28 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2015-09-28 | 2016-03-29 | 2016-09-28 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |