← Back to Patent Explorer
US7020697B1 Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Architectures for netcentric computing systems

Assignee: Accenture Global Services Ltd
•
Filing: 2000-11-03
•
Granted: 2006-03-28
•
Expires: 2020-11-03
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An execution architecture, a development architecture and an operations architecture for a netcentric computing system. The execution architecture contains common, run-time services required when an application executes in the netcentric computing system. The development architecture is the production environment for one or several systems development projects as well as for maintenance efforts. The purpose of the development environment is to support the tasks involved in the analysis, design, construction, and maintenance of business systems, as well as the associated management processes. It is important to note that the environment should adequately support all the development tasks, not just the code/compile/test/debug cycle. The operations architecture is a combination of tools and support services required to keep a production system up and running efficiently.

Inventors

  • 👤 Marina Goodman
  • 👤 Tor Mesoy
  • 👤 Stanton J. Taylor
  • 👤 Scott R. Reiter
  • 👤 Michael T. Bowen
  • 👤 Ralph Auriemma
  • 👤 Tamara D. Alairys
  • 👤 Christopher M. Degiorgio
  • 👤 Lizbeth Johnson Coleman

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-28 18:59
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q10/00; G06Q10/06; G06Q10/10; G06F; G06F11/00; G06F11/30; G06F11/34; G06F11/3409

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim 277 words
A netcentric computing system having an operations architecture stored on a computer readable medium, comprising: a operations integration architecture component executable to provide for the integration of other operations architecture components; a network/systems management component executable to survey a status of network devices for event faults and health information, to integrate into an overall management platform and to provide monitoring redundancy; a solution availability component executable to ensure availability of information technology systems through back-up or redundancy strategies by coordination of data across a plurality of network devices and by enablement of the netcentric computer system to recover from man-made and natural disasters that result in interruptions to service; a service management component executable to assist an information technology organization in providing quality information technology service and to support and to provide a central point of contact to route all reported incidents from users to support teams; a configuration management component executable to remotely administer changes to network components and to allow network management tools to remotely install or configure firmware or software on the network; a physical site management component executable to ensure that the physical environment is managed and protected against unplanned outages; an operations data architecture executable to support an overall service level agreement by defining how operations data is stored, accessed, used and distributed, and how an operations component interfaces to data generated by a different component; an operations execution architecture executable to provide the run-time services for execution of the operations architecture; and an operations development architecture, wherein the components provide specific functionality for the operations architecture, while the architectures represent the environments in which the components are developed, deployed, and operated.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 277 words
A netcentric computing system having an operations architecture stored on a computer readable medium, comprising: a operations integration architecture component executable to provide for the integration of other operations architecture components; a network/systems management component executable to survey a status of network devices for event faults and health information, to integrate into an overall management platform and to provide monitoring redundancy; a solution availability component executable to ensure availability of information technology systems through back-up or redundancy strategies by coordination of data across a plurality of network devices and by enablement of the netcentric computer system to recover from man-made and natural disasters that result in interruptions to service; a service management component executable to assist an information technology organization in providing quality information technology service and to support and to provide a central point of contact to route all reported incidents from users to support teams; a configuration management component executable to remotely administer changes to network components and to allow network management tools to remotely install or configure firmware or software on the network; a physical site management component executable to ensure that the physical environment is managed and protected against unplanned outages; an operations data architecture executable to support an overall service level agreement by defining how operations data is stored, accessed, used and distributed, and how an operations component interfaces to data generated by a different component; an operations execution architecture executable to provide the run-time services for execution of the operations architecture; and an operations development architecture, wherein the components provide specific functionality for the operations architecture, while the architectures represent the environments in which the components are developed, deployed, and operated.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 20 words
The operations architecture of claim 1 , wherein said operations integration architecture comprises an integration framework and a monitoring component.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 22 words
The operations architecture of claim 2 , wherein said integration framework further comprises an applications program interface and an enterprise management console.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 44 words
The operations architecture of claim 1 , wherein said network/systems management component is selected from the group consisting of a network management tool, a database management tool, an application management tool, a production scheduling tool, an output/input management tool and a security management tool.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 29 words
The operations architecture of claim 4 , wherein said network management tool is selected from the group consisting of a network monitoring component and a network configuration management component.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 28 words
The operations architecture of claim 4 , wherein database management component is selected from the group consisting of a database performance monitoring service and a backup preparation service.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 30 words
The operations architecture of claim 4 , wherein said output/input management tool is selected from the group consisting of an output job and queue manager, and a physical device manager.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 28 words
The operations architecture of claim 1 , wherein said solutions availability component is selected from the group consisting of a backup/storage/recovery management component and a failover management component.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 20 words
The operations architecture of claim 8 , further comprising a monitor for viewing application performance in a client server application.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 37 words
The operations architecture of claim 1 , wherein said service management component is selected from the group consisting of a service desk component, a capacity planning component, a user administration component and a service level management component.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 32 words
The operations architecture of claim 10 , wherein said service desk component includes a workflow automation service, a service desk database, an incident querying capability service and a service desk reporting service.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 26 words
The operations architecture of claim 10 , wherein said capacity planning, component includes a data collection agent, a scenario modeling agent and a data capture agent.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 42 words
The operations architecture of claim 1 , wherein said configuration management components is selected from the group consisting of a software distribution/file transfer component, an asset management component, a change control component, a migration control component and a systems configuration management component.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 20 words
The operations architecture of claim 13 , wherein said asset management component includes inventory management tools and license management tools.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 29 words
The operations architecture of claim 13 , wherein said change control component includes a change control workflow automation application, a change control database and a change control reporting service.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 36 words
The operations architecture of claim 1 , wherein said physical site management component includes a UPS/generator component, a raised floor, a fire suppression and climate control system, a plurality of wiring/cabling and a disaster recovery component.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 25 words
The operations architecture of claim 1 , wherein the network configuration management component identifies, controls or monitors a plurality of managed objects in the network.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 17 words
The operations architecture of claim 17 , wherein the managed objects are hardware objects or software objects.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 40 words
The operations architecture of claim 1 , wherein said operations integration architecture addresses integration of operations architecture components and decides on common standards, interfaces, message formats, monitoring responsibilities, and file logging formats used by other components of the operation architecture.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 33 words
The operations architecture of claim 2 , wherein said integration framework provides a foundation for standardizing the way system events are communicated, addressed, and managed throughout an environment of the netcentric computing system.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4809170A Cited
US5495610A Cited
US5590270A Cited
WO1992020022A1 Cited
EP0520923A2 Cited
US5535388A Cited
US5619716A Cited
US5602997A Cited
US5860012A Cited
WO1995023373A1 Cited
EP0697691A2 Cited
EP0697655A2 Cited
US5859969A Cited
US5745753A Cited
US5933582A Cited
US5742829A Cited
WO1997012311A2 Cited
US5758150A Cited
EP0769739A2 Cited
US5737533A Cited
US5956479A Cited
US5799297A Cited
US5710915A Cited
US6012071A Cited
US5805785A Cited
US6029192A Cited
EP0810520A1 Cited
US5781732A Cited
GB2315891A Cited
US5956400A Cited
US5761071A Cited
US5911071A Cited
EP0829808A2 Cited
US6067577A Cited
US5835090A Cited
US5930512A Cited
US6385655B1 Cited
EP0841616A2 Cited
US6023698A Cited
US6061695A Cited
US5892905A Cited
US5877759A Cited
WO1998052121A2 Cited
WO1998053396A1 Cited
US6038560A Cited
WO1998054660A8 Cited
WO1998057260A1 Cited
US5905868A Cited
US6006171A Cited
US6112304A Cited
US6615258B1 Cited
US5924096A Cited
EP0915422A1 Cited
US6457066B1 Cited
WO1999038079A1 Cited
US6401097B1 Cited
US6366912B1 Cited
US6185573B1 Cited
US6144975A Cited
US6321263B1 Cited
US6598046B1 Cited
US6584466B1 Cited
US6721713B1 Cited
US6556659B1 Cited
US6542593B1 Cited
US6704303B1 Cited
US6707812B1 Cited
US6195697B1 Cited
US6449588B1 Cited
US6081518A Cited
US6147975A Cited
US20020133328A1 Cited
US6426948B1 Cited
US6442547B1 Cited
US6122630A Cited
US6418430B1 Cited
US6523027B1 Cited
US6289382B1 Cited
US6345239B1 Cited
US6742015B1 Cited
US6438594B1 Cited
US6434628B1 Cited
US6434568B1 Cited
US6477580B1 Cited
US6477665B1 Cited
US6496850B1 Cited
US6502213B1 Cited
US6427132B1 Cited
US6529909B1 Cited
US6529948B1 Cited
US6539396B1 Cited
US20030058277A1 Cited
US6405364B1 Cited
US6549949B1 Cited
US6550057B1 Cited
US6370573B1 Cited
US6571282B1 Cited
US6578068B1 Cited
US6442748B1 Cited
US6339832B1 Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2009-03-27 2009-09-26 2010-03-28 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2013-03-27 2013-09-26 2014-03-28 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2017-03-27 2017-09-26 2018-03-28 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag