Patent US7184814B2 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US7184814B2
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Assessing the condition of a joint and assessing cartilage loss
Assignee: Leland Stanford Junior University
•
Filing: 2001-09-14
•
Granted: 2007-02-27
•
Expires: 2021-09-14
Abstract
Abstract Methods are disclosed for assessing the condition of a cartilage in a joint and assessing cartilage loss, particularly in a human knee. The methods include converting an image such as an MRI to a three dimensional map of the cartilage. The cartilage map can be correlated to a movement pattern of the joint to assess the affect of movement on cartilage wear. Changes in the thickness of cartilage over time can be determined so that therapies can be provided. The amount of cartilage tissue that has been lost, for example as a result of arthritis, can be estimated.
Inventors
- 👤 Philipp Lang
- 👤 Daniel Steines
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 12:55
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T7/00; G06T7/10; G06T7/11; A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/05; A61B5/055; A61B5/103; A61B5/1036; A61B5/1038; A61B5/107; A61B5/1075; A61B5/45; A61B5/4514; A61B5/4528; G01; G01R; G01R33/00; G01R33/20; G01R33/44; G01R33/48; G01R33/50; G01R33/54; G01R33/56; G06T7/0002; G06T7/0012; G06T7/187; A61B5/72; A61B5/7235; A61B5/7253; A61B5/7257; A61B6/00; A61B6/02; A61B6/03; A61B8/00; A61B8/08; A61B8/0875; G01R33/5608; G06T2207/00; G06T2207/10; G06T2207/10072; G06T2207/10088; G06T2207/30; G06T2207/30004; G06T2207/30008
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 48
Claim 1
Independent Claim
87 words
A method of assessing cartilage damage or disease in a point of a living subject, said joint comprising cartilage and bone on either side of the joint, which method comprises: (a) obtaining a three-dimensional volumetric representation of cartilage of said joint in which said three-dimensional volumetric representation demonstrates volume or thickness or biochemical contents or relaxation time of both normal and damaged or diseased cartilage of said joint; and (b) electronically determining at least one margin between damaged or diseased cartilage and normal cartilage in three dimensions.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
87 words
A method of assessing cartilage damage or disease in a point of a living subject, said joint comprising cartilage and bone on either side of the joint, which method comprises: (a) obtaining a three-dimensional volumetric representation of cartilage of said joint in which said three-dimensional volumetric representation demonstrates volume or thickness or biochemical contents or relaxation time of both normal and damaged or diseased cartilage of said joint; and (b) electronically determining at least one margin between damaged or diseased cartilage and normal cartilage in three dimensions.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said margin is determined by detecting a difference in said thickness, said biochemical contents or said relaxation time between said normal and said damaged or diseased cartilage.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said margin of said damaged or diseased cartilage is used to determine an area, volume, or thickness of damaged or diseased cartilage in said joint or a percentage of total cartilage surface or of articular surface area or of weight-bearing surface area represented by said damaged or diseased cartilage in said joint.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the joint is a knee joint.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said three dimensional volumetric representation is used to devise a treatment for damaged or diseased cartilage or bone.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said method is carried out at an initial time T 1 and at a later time T 2 and said method includes an analysis of degree of degeneration of the cartilage between T 1 and T 2 .
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the three-dimensional volumetric representation of cartilage is obtained by a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 7 , wherein the MRI technique first obtains a series of two-dimensional views of the joint which are then integrated to give three-dimensional images.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 7 , wherein the MRI technique employs a gradient echo, spin echo, fast-spin echo, driven equilibrium Fourier transform, or spoiled gradient echo technique.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said three-dimensional volume representation demonstrates thickness of both normal and damaged or diseased cartilage.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said three-dimensional volumetric representation demonstrates biochemical contents of both normal and damaged or diseased cartilage.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said three-dimensional volumetric representation demonstrates relaxation time of both normal and damaged or diseased cartilage.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said margin of damaged or diseased cartilage is used to determine an area, volume, or thickness of damaged or diseased cartilage in said joint.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
34 words
The meted of claim 1 , wherein said margin of damaged or diseased cartilage is used to determine a percentage of total cartilage surface represented by said damaged or diseased cartilage in said joint.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
33 words
The meted of claim 1 , wherein said margin of damaged or diseased cartilage is used to determine a percentage of articular surface represented by said damaged or diseased cartilage in said joint.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said margin of damaged or diseased cartilage is used to determine a percentage of weight bearing surface area represented by said damaged or diseased cartilage in said joint.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
87 words
A method of assessing cartilage damage or disease in a joint of a living subject, said joint comprising cartilage and accompanying bone on either side of the joint, which method comprises: (a) obtaining a three-dimensional volumetric representation of cartilage of said joint demonstrating volume or thickness or biochemical contents or relaxation time of both normal and diseased or damaged cartilage of said joint; and (b) electronically estimating thickness or area or volume of lost cartilage tissue relative to expected cartilage tissue in absence of disease or damage.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
87 words
A method of assessing cartilage damage or disease in a joint of a living subject, said joint comprising cartilage and accompanying bone on either side of the joint, which method comprises: (a) obtaining a three-dimensional volumetric representation of cartilage of said joint demonstrating volume or thickness or biochemical contents or relaxation time of both normal and diseased or damaged cartilage of said joint; and (b) electronically estimating thickness or area or volume of lost cartilage tissue relative to expected cartilage tissue in absence of disease or damage.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 17 , wherein said thickness, area or volume of said cartilage tissue that has been lost is performed by determining a margin between said diseased or damaged cartilage and said normal cartilage in said three-dimensional volumetric representation.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 18 , wherein said margin is determined by measuring changes in said thickness of said normal and said diseased cartilage, in said biochemical content of said normal and said diseased cartilage, or in said relaxation time of said normal and said diseased cartilage.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 17 , wherein said method is carried out at an initial time T 1 and at a later time T 2 and said determination includes a determination of the amount of cartilage lost between T 1 and T 2 .
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 20 , wherein said amount of cartilage tissue lost is determined as thickness or area or volume or content in one or more biochemical components of said cartilage tissue lost.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 21 , wherein said thickness, area, volume or content of said cartilage tissue lost is determined by determining a margin between diseased or damaged cartilage and normal cartilage.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 20 , wherein said change in said diseased cartilage or said cartilage tissue lost is determined without matching data obtained at T 1 and T 2 .
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 17 , wherein said three-dimensional volumetric representation demonstrates thickness of both normal and damaged or diseased cartilage.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 17 , wherein said three-dimensional volumetric representation demonstrates biochemical contents of both normal and damaged or diseased cartilage.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 17 , wherein said three-dimensional volumetric representation demonstrates relaxation time of both normal and damaged or diseased cartilage.
Claim 29
Independent Claim
91 words
A method of assessing cartilage damage or disease in a joint of a living subject, said joint comprising cartilage and bone on either side of the joint, which method comprises: (a) obtaining a three-dimensional volumetric representation of cartilage of said joint in which said volumetric representation demonstrates volume or thickness or biochemical contents or relaxation time of both normal and damaged or diseased cartilage of said joint; and (b) electronically placing a volume of interest smaller than the articular cartilage surface in or around an area of diseased or damaged cartilage.
Claim 30
Independent Claim
91 words
A method of assessing cartilage damage or disease in a joint of a living subject, said joint comprising cartilage and bone on either side of the joint, which method comprises: (a) obtaining a three-dimensional volumetric representation of cartilage of said joint in which said volumetric representation demonstrates volume or thickness or biochemical contents or relaxation time of both normal and damaged or diseased cartilage of said joint; and (b) electronically placing a volume of interest smaller than the articular cartilage surface in or around an area of diseased or damaged cartilage.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 27 , wherein said region of interest is determined by detecting a difference in said volume, said thickness, said biochemical contents or said relaxation time between said normal and said damaged or diseased cartilage.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
55 words
The method of claim 27 , wherein said region of interest is used to determine an area, volume, or thickness of damaged or diseased cartilage in said joint or a percentage of total cartilage surface or of articular surface area or of weight-bearing surface area represented by said damaged or diseased cartilage in said joint.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 27 , wherein the joint is a knee joint.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 27 , wherein said volumetric representation is used to devise a treatment for damaged or diseased cartilage or bone.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 27 , wherein said method is carried out at an initial time T 1 and at a later time T 2 and said method includes an analysis of degree of degeneration of the cartilage between T 1 and T 2 .
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 27 , wherein the three-dimensional volumetric representation of cartilage is obtained by a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 33 , wherein the MRI technique first obtains a series of two-dimensional views of the joint which are then integrated to give three-dimensional images.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 33 , wherein the MRI technique employs a gradient echo, spin echo, fast-spin echo, driven equilibrium Fourier transform, or spoiled gradient echo technique.
Claim 39
Independent Claim
93 words
A method of assessing cartilage damage or disease in a joint of a living subject said joint comprising cartilage and bone on either side of the joint which method comprises: (a) obtaining a three-dimensional dataset of the articular cartilage that includes information on volume or thickness or biochemical contents or relaxation time of said cartilage; (b) electronically selecting a subregion of the articular cartilage that is smaller than the cartilage surface; and (c) performing a quantitative measurement of volume or thickness or biochemical contents or relaxation time of said cartilage in said subregion.
Claim 40
Independent Claim
93 words
A method of assessing cartilage damage or disease in a joint of a living subject said joint comprising cartilage and bone on either side of the joint which method comprises: (a) obtaining a three-dimensional dataset of the articular cartilage that includes information on volume or thickness or biochemical contents or relaxation time of said cartilage; (b) electronically selecting a subregion of the articular cartilage that is smaller than the cartilage surface; and (c) performing a quantitative measurement of volume or thickness or biochemical contents or relaxation time of said cartilage in said subregion.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein said region of interest is determined by detecting a difference in said volume, said thickness, said biochemical contents or said relaxation time between said normal and said damaged or diseased cartilage.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
55 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein said region of interest is used to determine an area, volume, or thickness of damaged or diseased cartilage in said joint or a percentage of total cartilage surface or of articular surface area or of weight-bearing surface area represented by said damaged or diseased cartilage in said joint.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein the joint is a knee joint.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein said three-dimensional dataset is used to devise a treatment for damaged or diseased cartilage or bone.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein said method is carried out at an initial time T 1 and at a later time T 2 and said method includes an analysis of degree of degeneration of the cartilage between T 1 and T 2 .
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein the three-dimensional dataset of cartilage is obtained by a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 42 , wherein the MRI technique first obtains a series of two-dimensional views of the joint which are then integrated to give three-dimensional images.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 42 , wherein the MRI technique employs a gradient echo, spin echo, fast-spin echo, driven equilibrium Fourier transform, or spoiled gradient echo technique.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4631676A
Cited
US4655227A
Cited
US4699156A
Cited
US4813436A
Cited
US4823807A
Cited
US5099859A
Cited
US5246013A
Cited
US5154178A
Cited
US5206023A
Cited
US5853746A
Cited
US5291401A
Cited
US5503162A
Cited
US5433215A
Cited
US5749362A
Cited
US5320102A
Cited
US5445152A
Cited
US5564437A
Cited
US5899859A
Cited
US5772595A
Cited
US5810006A
Cited
US5413116A
Cited
US5961454A
Cited
US5541515A
Cited
US5427099A
Cited
US5682886A
Cited
US6175655B1
Cited
US5824085A
Cited
US5928945A
Cited
US5779651A
Cited
US6289753B1
Cited
US5880976A
Cited
US5995738A
Cited
US6002859A
Cited
US6205411B1
Cited
US6078680A
Cited
US5913821A
Cited
US6161080A
Cited
US6316153B1
Cited
US6533737B1
Cited
US6450978B1
Cited
US20020087274A1
Cited
US6310619B1
Cited
US6310477B1
Cited
US6560476B1
Cited
US6334066B1
Cited
US20020016543A1
Cited
US6249692B1
Cited
WO2002022014A1
Cited
US20020147392A1
Cited
US20030015208A1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2010-02-26 | 2010-08-28 | 2011-02-27 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2014-02-26 | 2014-08-28 | 2015-02-27 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2018-02-26 | 2018-08-28 | 2019-02-27 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |